Cases

ORDER Honorable Roslyn O. Silver, Senior United States District Judge Plaintiffs, minors in the custody of the Arizona foster. care system, allege widespread systemic failures in state child welfare agencies “expos[e] them to ... physical and emotional harm and unreasonable risk of harm” in violation of their constitutional rights. (Doc. 37 at 2). Defendants moved the Court abstain and dismiss the seco

W. SHARP, J. Raana Naushad, who slipped and fell in a Winn Dixie store, and her husband, ap*142peal from a final summary judgment m favor of Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. The trial judge concluded, based on the pleadings and depositions of record, that there was insufficient evidence to establish actual notice or constructive notice on the part of Winn Dixie that the item c

Graham, J. The allegations in the petition are insufficient to set aside the award. Executors are authorized to submit to arbitration all contested or doubtful claims for or against the estate. Code, § 4004. They may in good faith and with proper prudence submit to arbitration the matter in controversy in connection with the estate they represent. The award may be made the judgment of the court. Code, § 5030.

Powell, J. The plaintiff in error excepts to the overruling of his motion for new trial, and also to the refusal of the trial judge to continue the motion in order to enable him to complete an extraordinary ground. At the time set for the hearing of the motion, the movant’s attorney requested that he be allowed a few days longer in which to prepare an additional amendment, on the ground of newly discovered evidence of one Connor, wh

Opinion of the Court by Chief Justice Miller Reversing. This suit was brought by the fifteen appellees, as taxpayers of Estill County, to enjoin the fiscal court of that county from levying a tax to pay the principal or the interest on fifty bonds of the aggregate face value of $50,000.00, issued by Estill County in 1888 to the Richmond, Nicholasville, Irvine & Beattyville Railroad Company, u

White, J. It appears that the indictment in this case was drawn by filling up, in writing, the blanks in a printed *623form. Above the writing was printed the words, “VanBeek, Barnard & Tinsley, printers, stationers, lithographers, and blank-book makers, St. Louis ; Class 2.”' Then followed, in writing, the caption, in these words, viz. r “ The State of Texas, ) In the

160 Ga. App. 328 (1981) ASKEA v. THE STATE. 62170. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided November 9, 1981. Gerald L. Talansky, Kenneth T. Humphries, for appellant. William A. Foster III, District Attorney, Frank Winn, Barbara V. Tinsley, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee. McMURRAY, Presiding Judge. The defendant, following

Quillian, Chief Judge. The state appeals the grant of a motion to suppress evidence obtained by the use of a search warrant. Held: The search warrant was issued by a juvenile court judge, not in the course of juvenile proceedings and when no juvenile was involved in the search. The trial judge ruled that a juvenile court judge is not authorized to sign a search warrant for an adult, unless and until

159 Ga. App. 600 (1981) 284 S.E.2d 103 MORRIS v. THE STATE. 62177. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided September 18, 1981. *602 Robert A. Kunz, Michael R. Hauptman, for appellant. William A. Foster III, District Attorney, Frank C. Winn, Barbara V. Tinsley, Assistant District Attorneys,

Gregory, Justice. In 1977 appellant was sentenced to a term of ten years for the offense of armed robbery, part to be served in confinement and the remainder on probation. After his release from prison he was employed by the City of Bremen. On June 4,1980 he was arrested on a charge of burglary of the Bremen City Hall. While in custody of the police the appellant, who is epileptic, asked to see a doctor. He then gave an incr

Underwood, Judge. The appellant, Minis, who was in the lock and safe business, was indicted for burglary involving a Pizza Hut restaurant in Douglas County. During a lengthy trial the state presented evidence that Minis planned the Pizza Hut burglary, instructed his accomplices on how to get into the building and gain entrance to a safe, provided tools and transportation to and from the Pizza Hut and shared money taken from

BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Prisoner Transportation Services, LLC's ("PTS") Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, ECF No. [71] (the "Motion"). The Court has carefully reviewed the Motion, all opposing and supporting materials, the record in this case, the applicable law,

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Carla Denise Garrison and Clint Garrison, Petitioners- Respondents, v. Target Corporation, Respondent-Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2020-000523 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Anderson County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28080 Heard May 26, 2021 – Filed January 26, 2022 AFFIRMED AS MODIFIE

380 S.C. 263 (2008) 670 S.E.2d 1 Angela YOUMANS as Personal Representative of the Estate of Deonte ELMORE, Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent. No. 4437. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard September 17, 2008. Decided September 24, 2008. Rehearing Denied December 19, 2008.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1868 Doc: 69 Filed: 07/20/2022 Pg: 1 of 45 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1868 JONATHAN R., minor, by Next Friend, Sarah Dixon; ANASTASIA M., minor, by Next Friend, Cheryl Ord; SERENA S., minor, by Next Friend, Sarah Dixon; THE

69 F.Supp.2d 842 (1999) William Eugene BOLINSKY, Plaintiff, v. CARTER MACHINERY COMPANY, INC., Defendant. No. 2:99CV00047. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Big Stone Gap Division. October 14, 1999. *843 Carl E. McAfee, McAfee Law Firm, P.C., Norton, VA, for Plaintiff. Thomas M. Winn, III, Woods, Rogers & Ha

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Carla Denise Garrison and Clint Garrison, Appellants/Respondents, v. Target Corporation, Respondent/Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-000267 Appeal From Anderson County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5711 Heard May 15, 2019 – Filed January 15, 2020 AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED Joshua Thomas Hawkins and Helena LeeAnn Jedz

961 S.W.2d 40 (1998) Jeanette Mitchell WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Margie Ann PHELPS, Appellee, Margie Ann Phelps, Appellant, Jeanette Mitchell Williams, Appellee. Nos. 96-CA-2349-MR, 97-CA-0410-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. February 6, 1998. Darryl T. Owens, Louisville, for appellant. Teddy B. Gordon, Louisville, for appellee. Before COMBS, GA

169 F.Supp.2d 539 (2001) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 7:00CV00757. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. August 2, 2001. *540 *541 Victor M. Lawrence, Richard J. Mrizek, Equal Employment Opportunity Co

851 So.2d 1090 (2003) Sonja WISE v. BOSSIER PARISH SCHOOL BOARD. No. 2002-C-1525. Supreme Court of Louisiana. June 27, 2003. Rehearing Denied September 5, 2003. *1091 Robert L. Hammonds, Hammonds & Sills, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Applicant. Jay A. Ginsberg, Charles M. Samuel, III, Rittenberg & Samu