Cases

WALLACH, Circuit Judge. The Wind Tower Trade Coalition (“Appellant” or the “Coalition”), a group of domestic manufacturers of utility scale wind towers, appeals the decision of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) denying its motions for preliminary injunctions. See Wind Tower Trade Coal. v. United States, 904 F.Supp.2d 1349 (Ct. Int’l Trade

OPINION and ORDER GORDON, Judge: These actions involve the administration of trade remedy provisional measures (cash deposits) pursuant to Sections 706(b) and 736(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671e(b) & 16736(b), 1 by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) at

OPINION Restani, Judge: This matter is before the court following a remand to the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) ordered after the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) issued its mandate in CS Wind Vietnam Co. v. United States, 832 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (“CS Wind IV”). In CS Wind IV, the Federal Circuit reversed

*1369 TARANTO, Circuit Judge. The Commerce Department determined that a Vietnamese manufacturer of wind towers was selling its products in the United States at about 51.5% below normal value, a figure that Commerce calculated using methods made applicable by statute when imported goods come from a non-

OPINION RESTANI, Judge: This action challenges the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) final results rendered in the antidumping (“AD”) 1 investigation of certain wind towers from Vietnam. See Utility Seale Wind Towers from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final

Slip Op. 25-148 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Leo M. Gordon, Judge Defendant, Court No. 24-00070 and DONGKUK S&C CO., LTD., Defendant-Intervenor. OPINION and ORDER [U.S. Department of Commerce’s final r

Slip Op. 17-53 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CS WIND VIETNAM CO., LTD., and CS WIND CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge v. Court No. 13-00102 UNITED STATES, Defendant, WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, Def

Slip Op. 15- 45 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CS WIND VIETNAM CO., LTD. and CS WIND CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge UNITED STATES, Court No. 13-00102 Defendant, WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, Defendant-Intervenor.

Slip Op. 14- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CS WIND VIETNAM CO., LTD. and CS WIND CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge UNITED STATES, Court No. 13-00102 Defendant, WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, Defendant-Intervenor.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN. , Concurring in part opinion filed by Circuit Judge WALLACH. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. Siemens Energy, Inc., an importer of utility scale wind towers, appeals the decision of the Court of International Trade, which upheld the International Trade Commission’s (ITC or Commission) final affirmative injury determination in the an-tidumpi

OPINION BARNETT, Judge: Plaintiffs, Siemens Energy, Inc. (“Siemens”), Titan Wind Energy (Suzhou), CS *1321 Wind Tech, CS Wind Vietnam, and Chengxi Shipyard (collectively, “Titan”), move, pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2, for judgment on the agency record, challenging the United

MEMORANDUM and ORDER EATON, Judge: This action concerns the five-year, or “sunset,” review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) which was initiated by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the Department”) by publication of a notice in the Federal Register on

Case: 23-1877 Document: 85 Page: 1 Filed: 04/22/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MARMEN INC., MARMEN ENERGIE INC., MARMEN ENERGY CO., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2023-1877

Slip Op. 25-149 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Court No. 24-00079 CS WIND MALAYSIA SDN. BHD. and CS WIND CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: M. Miller Baker, Judge OPINION [Su

Appellate Case: 18-1366 Document: 010110616083 Date Filed: 12/08/2021 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 8, 2021

Slip Op. 23- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE MARMEN INC., MARMEN ÉNERGIE INC., and MARMEN ENERGY CO., Plaintiffs, and WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, Consolidated Plaintiff, Before: Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge v. Consol. Court No. 20-00169 UNITED STATES, Defendant, and WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, MARMEN INC., MARMEN ÉNERGIE

Slip Op. 25- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CS WIND MALAYSIA SDN. BHD. and CS WIND CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Gary S. Katzmann, Judge Court No. 24-00150 Defendant, and WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, Defendant-Intervenor.

Case: 23-1661 Document: 65 Page: 1 Filed: 01/07/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ OMAN FASTENERS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNITED STATES, Defendant MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC., Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2023-1661

Case: 22-1807 Document: 106 Page: 1 Filed: 06/21/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ THE GOVERNMENT OF QUEBEC, MARMEN INC., MARMEN ENERGIE INC., MARMEN ENERGY CO., THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, Defendants-Appellees THE GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO,

Case: 22-1807 Document: 106 Page: 1 Filed: 06/21/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ THE GOVERNMENT OF QUEBEC, MARMEN INC., MARMEN ENERGIE INC., MARMEN ENERGY CO., THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, Defendants-Appellees THE GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO,