⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

13 opinions for “Wimberly v. Bonilla”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-06-07 · Published · cited 105× · 650 F.3d 350; 2011 WL 2207110
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment: I am happy to concur in substantial part in Judge Keenan’s thoughtful opinion. It does a fine job explaining why donning and doffing at the beginning and end of the workday is compensable. The court rightly notes that this case presents a different question than Sepulveda v. Allen Family Foods, Inc., 591 F.3d 209 (4th Cir.2
State v. Blisspublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 17× · 423 P.3d 53; 363 Or. 426
BALMER, J. *54**428In this criminal case, defendant sought to suppress evidence discovered in a warrantless search of his car, asserting that, because he had been stopped for a traffic infraction rather than in connection with a crime, the police officer's fa
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-11-05 · Published · cited 0×
JUDGMENT Court of Appeals First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00027-CV JUAN ALANIZ, ET AL., Appellants1 1 The appellants are: Bernardino Acevedo, Juan A. Alaniz, Rafael Alaniz, Louie Albarado, Walter Albro, Haskell Andrews, Johnny Anazaldua, Jose Manuel Araujo, James D. Archer, Roberto Ovalle Armendariz, Matthew Auguste, David Bachus, Richard
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2012-03-28 · Published · cited 0× · 185 P.R. 146
La Jueza Asociada Señora Fiol Matta emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Se cuestiona en este recurso si la doctrina de la antisu-brogación, que le niega a una aseguradora el derecho a subrogarse contra su propio asegurado, tiene cabida en nuestro ordenamiento jurídico. Si resolvemos en la afirma-tiva, tenemos que precisar los contornos de dicha doctrina y su aplicación a los hechos particulares de este caso. De igu
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2011-03-28 · Published · cited 0× · 784 F. Supp. 2d 653; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34172; 2011 WL 1188698
784 F.Supp.2d 653 (2011) Brian ISREAL, et al., v. RAEFORD FARMS OF LOUISIANA, LLC, et al. Civil Action No. 06-cv-1999. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Shreveport Division. March 28, 2011. *654 Robert L. Salim, Law Office of Robert L. Salim, Natchitoches, LA, Joseph Carter *655 Me
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-11-05 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued November 5, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00027-CV ——————————— JUAN ALANIZ, ET AL., Appellants 1 1 The appellants are: Bernardino Acevedo, Juan A. Alaniz, Rafael Alaniz, Lo
People v. Clarkpublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 2024-12-19 · Published · cited 31× · 2024 IL 127838
2024 IL 127838 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 127838) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. ANGELO CLARK, Appellant. Opinion filed December 19, 2024.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998-03-06 · Published · cited 10× · 709 So. 2d 283; 1998 WL 100365
709 So.2d 283 (1998) Paula B. ANDERSON, et vir., Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. BEAUREGARD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee, Blood Systems, Inc., Third-Party Defendant—Appellee. No. 97-1222. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 6, 1998. *284 John Layne Hammons, Shreveport, for Paula B. Anderson, et vir. E
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995-07-13 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 2000 Session LAURA COFFEY, ET AL. v. CHEROKEE AVIATION, INC. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 2-361-96 Harold Wimberly, Judge No. E1999-01037-COA-R3-CV This is an appeal from a jury verdict finding Cherokee Aviation, Inc. not liable for th
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2012-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Integrand Assurance Company Peticionaria v. Codeco, Cigna Insurance Co., Jonh Doe, Richard Doe, Compañía de Seguros X, Y y Z Recurridos Marcelino Fernández Corp., Newport Cold Storage, Inc., Food Services, Inc., Frozens, Inc., Fronda, Inc. Demandantes-Interventores y Apelantes, ahora Apelada v. Integrand Assurance Co., Codeco (hoy Promoexport) y Cigna Insurance Company
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002-08-14 · Published · cited 27× · 215 F. Supp. 2d 795; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16929; 2002 WL 1869869
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams