Cases

402 B.R. 66 (2009) David L. WILSON, Jr., Debtor. David L. Wilson, Jr., Appellant, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellee. BAP No. 08-044. Bankruptcy No. 08-11154-FJB. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit. March 6, 2009. *67 David G. Baker, Esq., on brief for Appellant. Elizabeth A. Lonardo, Esq.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-2381 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 2 : ZENOBI

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Wilson (2019 NY Slip Op 07110) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Wilson 2019 NY Slip Op 07110 Decided on October 2, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bu

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-16-00051-CV JEFF HOLLINGSWORTH, SHERRY APPELLANTS HOLLINGSWORTH, AND JAMES WILSON V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL APPELLEE ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR ABFC 2006-OPT2 TRUST, ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERI

PER CURIAM: Jennie McQueen appeals, pro se,1 from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Aerotek, Inc. (Aerotek), and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (Wells Fargo), in her employment discrimination suit under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a), 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621. McQueen, a 62-year old African-American female represe

David C. Godbey, United States District Judge This Order addresses Defendant Wells Fargo Bank NA's ("Wells Fargo") motion to dismiss [16] and Karen Ann Arndt's motion to appoint an attorney ad litem for Kenneth Arndt [24]. The Court denies the motion to dismiss as to the issue of capacity but otherwise grants the motion, and denies the motion to appoint an attorney ad litem. I. ORIGINS OF THE DISPUTE

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: *1263 This pair of ambitious fair housing lawsuits brought by the City of Miami against major financial institutions returns to our Court after having been appealed to the Supreme Court and resolved there in Bank of America Corp. v. City of Miami

Mary R. Russell, Judge This case arises out of the 2008 foreclosure of the family residence of David and Crystal Holm (the Holms). The Holms filed a wrongful foreclosure action against Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., for allegedly foreclosing on their home without right. They also filed a quiet title action against the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), which took title to the house after the foreclosure sa

Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge County of Cook, Illinois, alleges in this suit that Wells Fargo & Co. and related entities (collectively, "Wells Fargo") issued predatory subprime mortgage loans to Cook County residents that over the years went into default and drove the mortgaged properties into foreclosure. According to the County, because the scheme was and remains concentrated in heavily minority neighborhoods, W

WESTBROOKS, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. This appeal is taken from the Harrison County Circuit Court. Paige Electric LLC (Paige Electric) sought recovery of a check, in the amount of $83,972.08, from Wells Fargo and Co. (Wells Fargo). Finding no error in the circuit court’s dismissal of Paige Electric’s case, we affirm.' FACTS A

ROBRENO, District Judge: Christina Felts appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of her mortgage servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), with respect to Felts' claim that Wells Fargo failed to conduct a reasonable investigation into the accuracy of its credit reporting of her mortgage loan, in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("the FCRA" or "the Act"

PER CURIAM. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2001-B, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2001-B, appeals the trial court’s order involuntarily dismissing its foreclosure action against Richard Wilson following a non-jury trial. Mr. Wilson cross-appeals, challenging the admission of certain business records, particularly, a copy of the note and allonges. We affirm, but write to address two

Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Scott Feinerman, United States District Judge County of'Cook, Illinois, alleges in this lawsuit that Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Financial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and 375 unnamed Wells Fargo entities (collectively, “Wells Fargo”) issued predatory subprime mortgage loans that over the years went into default and drove the mortgaged properties into for

Affirmed.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WALLACE CAPEL, JR., United States Magistrate Judge. Before the court is Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16) and Supplement to the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 30). Upon consideration of the Motion (Docs. 16 & 30), the briefs filed in opposition to and in support of the Motion, and the record as a whole, the court finds that the Motion for Summary Judgme

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: On December 13, 2011, the City of Miami brought three separate fair housing lawsuits against Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Citigroup. Each alleged that the bank in question had engaged in a decade-long pattern of discriminatory lending by targeting minorities for predatory loans. The complaints in each case were largely identical, each identifying the

621 F.Supp.2d 545 (2009) WELLS FARGO BANK, etc., Plaintiff, v. Steven GILLELAND, et al., Defendant. Case No. 3:08 CV 2970. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. June 2, 2009. *546 Robin M. Wilson, Thompson Hine, Cleveland, OH, Susana Lykins, Lerner Sampson & Rothfuss, Cincinnati, OH, for Plaintiffs. <

Affirmed.

PAUL C. WILSON, Judge. William and Susan Smith lost their home in a foreclosure sale. When they failed to vacate, the foreclosure purchaser, Wells Fargo, sued for unlawful detainer. The circuit court granted summary judgment to Wells Fargo, and the Smiths appeal. The Smiths argue that, because section 534.210, RSMo,1 is unconstitutional, summary judgment was improper and the case should be remand

PER CURIAM: On the Court’s own motion, we vacate the original opinion in this case, issued on June 5, 2014, and substitute the following opinion in its place. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”), Pub.L. No. 102-243,105 Stat. 2394, makes it unlawful to make any call using an automatic telephone dialing system (an “autodial system”) to a