Cases

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 13, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file amended application is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 29, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions to expand record and to remand are DENIED.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 13, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's July 3, 2018 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's July 27, 2018 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to add to the record is DENIED. I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2017 *349order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 28, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to remand is DENIED.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's December 27, 2017 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan November 24, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 161166

McCORMACK, J. As this case implicates more than one somewhat complex legal doctrine, it may be useful first to state the practical question we confront in as plain English as possible: Can a defendant whose conviction for felony murder has been reversed on appeal be retried for *96that charge when he was also acquitted of the

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 25, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 159179

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan July 6, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 161371 & (13)

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION May 6, 2021 Plaintiff-Appellee, v

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION May 6, 2021 Plaintiff-Appellee, 9:1

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan November 24, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 161070 & (18)

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 21, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 160980