Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Wilson v. Morrow”
Wilson v. Morrowpublic domain
151 P.3d 930 (2007) 342 Or. 256 WILSON v. MORROW. No. S53939. Supreme Court of Oregon January 10, 2007. Petition for review denied.
WILSON, Circuit Judge, concurring: In light of our mandatory deference to the Supreme Court of Georgia's decision under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, I concur with the result in this case. But in my estimation, the Superior Court of Butts County's resolution of the issues presented here was far more thorough and considerate than the resolution reached by the Supreme Court of Georgia in its reversal of the S
Morrow v. Xanterra Parks & Resortspublic domain
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIM ALAN B. JOHNSON, District Judge. Plaintiff Tobe Morrow suffered injuries after he was bucked from a horse during a guided horseback ride conducted by Defendant Xanterra Parks & Resorts. Mr. Morrow brought suit against Xanterra and four John Doe defendants, alleging that his injuries resulted from Defendants’ negligence. Xanterra
Morrow v. Bank of America, N.A.public domain
JUSTICE MCKINNON, concurring in part and dissentingin part. *60¶72 At its inception, and throughout the proceedings in the District Court, this lawsuit has been about two things: (1) enforcing a modified loan, and (2) obtaining damages for alleged torts arising from the loan mod
Morrow v. City of Oaklandpublic domain
MEMORANDUM** In these three pro se appeals, Oakland police officer Frank Morrow, Jr. appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing, pursuant to settlement, Griselvia Castaneda’s civil rights action against Morrow and the City of Oakland (“City”), and Morrow’s own civil rights actions arising from the handling of Castaneda’s complaint. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de no
State v. Morrowpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Morrow, 2023-Ohio-2891.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 2023-CA-6 : v.
In re: Morrowpublic domain
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 26-APR-2022 01:27 PM Dkt. 4 ODDP SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF T
State v. Morrowpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Morrow, 2022-Ohio-1089.] COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon
Morrow v. Statepublic domain
Pierron, J.: Jeffrey Morrow appeals the dismissal of his K.S.A. 60-1507 motion for post-conviction relief, based on ineffective assistance of counsel during direct appeal. We reverse the dismissal and remand the motion for hearing. Morrow was convicted by jury trial of two counts of arson (K.S.A. 21-3718) on May 13, 1991. Throughout the trial he was *237
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 87-2-04812-3, J. Kelley Arnold, J., entered May 12, 1989. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Alexander, J., concurred in by Worswick, C.J., and Morgan, J.
Morrow v. Meachumpublic domain
ANDREW S. OLDHAM, Circuit Judge: Austin Moon was a young motorcyclist. He liked to ride fast. So fast, in fact, he twice eluded police officers at triple-digit speeds. On officers' third attempt to stop Moon, a Criminal District Attorney Investigator named Jonathan Meachum caused Moon to crash. Moon died. The question presented is whether Meachum is entitled to qualified immunity. The district court held yes. We affirm.
Morrow v. Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C.public domain
360 F.Supp.2d 1246 (2005) Christi L. MORROW, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GREEN TREE SERVICING, L.L.C, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:04cv873-T. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. February 11, 2005. *1247 Jere L. Beasley, Roman Ashley Shaul, Wilson
Contemporary Imports, Inc. v. Morrow (In re Morrow)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Shelley D. Rucker, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Contemporary Imports, Inc., d/b/a Contemporary Mitsubishi (“Contemporary” or “Plantiff”) seeks a judgment against Stephanie Anne Roller (“Defendant” or “Debtor”), for $16,425 along with prejudgment interest at the rate of 7%. It also seeks a determination that the debt is nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(2), (4), and (6).
Robin Morrow Elliott v. Michael R. Morrowpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 19, 2013 Session ROBBIN MORROW ELLIOTT ET AL. v. MICHAEL R. MORROW Appeal from the Chancery Court for Meigs County No. 4392 Frank V. Williams, III, Chancellor No. E2013-00692-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 23, 2013 In this real property dispute, the plaintiffs, three siblings, brought a complaint agai
Morrow v. Vibration Mountings & Controls, Inc.public domain
Morrow v Vibration Mountings & Controls, Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 00188) Morrow v Vibration Mountings & Controls, Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 00188 Decided on January 17, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State
Pools Unlimited, Inc. Randy Lee Morrow And Rhonda Jean Morrow v. John Houchens and Brenda Houchenspublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON MOTION FOR REHEARING NO. 03-21-00046-CV Pools Unlimited, Inc.; Randy Lee Morrow; and Rhonda Jean Morrow, Appellants v. John Houchens and Brenda Houchens, Appellees FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. C2017-2079B, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PR
Pools Unlimited, Inc. Randy Lee Morrow And Rhonda Jean Morrow v. John Houchens and Brenda Houchenspublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00046-CV Pools Unlimited, Inc.; Randy Lee Morrow; and Rhonda Jean Morrow, Appellants v. John Houchens and Brenda Houchens, Appellees FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. C2017-2079B, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPI
Charles Levi Morrow v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS CHARLES LEVI MORROW, § No. 08-16-00040-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the v.
United States v. Morrowpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On July 15, 2005, Miquel Morrow (“Morrow”) was convicted by a jury in this Court of: conspiracy to conduct and participate, directly and indirectly, in the affairs of an enterprise, through a pattern of racketeering activity (“Count I”), including the armed robbery of the Bank of Americ
City of Pittsburgh v. Wilsonpublic domain
WETTICK JR., A.J., This is a declaratory judgment action brought by the City of Pittsburgh.1 The city seeks the entry of a judgment declaring that the law permits the city to use a polygraph procedure to disqualify applicants for firefighter positions. In their answer to the city’s amended complaint, defendants also seek declaratory relief. They request this court to enter a judgment declari