Cases

540 S.E.2d 324 (2000) 353 N.C. 188 John Brent FROST and Carolyn Frost and Persons Similarly Situated, v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.; Mazda Motors of America (East), Inc.; Primus Automotive Financial Services, Inc. d/b/a Mazda American Credit; Al Smith Buick Co., Inc., a North Carolina corporation d/b/a Al Smith Buick Dodge Mazda; Automobiles of Asheboro, Inc., a North Carolina corporation d/b/a Asheboro Honda Mazda; Bob

621 N.E.2d 250 (1993) 251 Ill. App.3d 79 190 Ill.Dec. 381 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ONE 1986 WHITE MAZDA PICKUP TRUCK, VIN JM2UF1118G0577930, Defendant (Mark Brown, Claimant-Appellee). No. 2-92-0666. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. September 23, 1993.

642 N.E.2d 455 (1994) 162 Ill.2d 67 204 Ill.Dec. 754 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. ONE 1986 WHITE MAZDA PICKUP TRUCK (Mark Brown, Appellee.) No. 76349. Supreme Court of Illinois. September 29, 1994. Roland W. Burris, Atty. Gen., Springfield, and David R. Akemann, State's Atty., of St. Charles (Norb

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO STRIKE [34] AND MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AND THIRD CAUSES OF ACTION [32] DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge. Julie Barrera, Courtroom Clerk. Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion to Strike Marketing, Advertising, and Warranty Allegations and Exhibits in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“Motion to Strike”)

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) v. ) I.D. No. 2212001161 ) TEDDY WILSON, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Su

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS IN RE: RUDOLPH AUTOMOTIVE, § LLC D/B/A RUDOLPH MAZDA and No. 08-18-00149-CV RUDOLPH CHEVROLET, LLC, § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING Relators.

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS IN RE: RUDOLPH AUTOMOTIVE, § LLC D/B/A RUDOLPH MAZDA and No. 08-18-00149-CV RUDOLPH CHEVROLET, LLC, § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING Relators.

90 F.Supp.2d 757 (2000) Abdul Ali MOHAMED, Individually And As Next Friend For, Shehrazade Mohamed, A Minor Child, And As Representative of the Estate of Dr. Khaduah Abdul Ali Mohamed, Plaintiffs, v. MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION, and Mazda Motor of America, Inc., Defendants. No. 2:99-CV-0231(TH). United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. March 27, 2000.

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § RUDOLPH AUTOMOTIVE, LLC D/B/A No. 08-24-00142-CV RUDOLPH MAZDA, § Appeal from the Appellant, §

2025 IL App (3d) 240079 Opinion filed September 25, 2025 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT 2025 JEFFREY WILSON,

166 F.Supp.2d 181 (2001) Ana Ilsen CARRASQUILLA and Olga Lucia Laprade, as Co-Administratrices of the Estate of Argenix Suarez, deceased; Marco Carrasquilla; and Ana Ilsen Carrasquilla, Plaintiffs, v. MAZDA MOTOR CORP., a/k/a Mazda Motors Corp,; Mazda (North America), Inc.; and Mazda Motor of America, Inc., Defendants, v. Mark Thompson, Third-Party Defendant. No. 4:CV-96-2240. United States Dis

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0135 ══════════ In re Rudolph Automotive, LLC d/b/a Rudolph Mazda and Rudolph Chevrolet, LLC, Relators ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ═══════════════════════════════════════ Argued December 1, 2022 JUSTICE YOUNG delive

603 S.E.2d 456 (2004) 269 Ga. App. 62 McDONALD v. MAZDA MOTORS OF AMERICA, INC. No. A04A1411. Court of Appeals of Georgia. August 10, 2004. Certiorari Denied November 22, 2004. *458 Amy Myers-Burns, Eric Fortas, Amy Budow, Krohn & Moss, Ltd., Atlanta, for Appellant. Charles Mars

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Order entered November 3, 1999 affirmed, with $10 costs. We agree with Civil Court that this nonprimary residence proceeding against a protected occupant of an interim multiple dwelling unit was properly commenced upon a 30-day notice of termination. Landlord was not required to serve a 120- to 150-day notice of nonrenewal because the transition from Loft L

941 So.2d 967 (2005) Randolph G. WILSON III v. Teresa L. WILSON. No. 2030896. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. March 18, 2005. Certiorari Denied May 12, 2006. David B. Byrne, Jr., of Capell & Howard, P.C., Montgomery, for appellant. *968 Floyd Minor and John Olszewski of Minor & Olszewski, L.L.C.

966 N.E.2d 1259 (2012) Douglas P. WILSON, Jr., Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 79A05-1107-CR-350. Court of Appeals of Indiana. May 9, 2012. *1261 Steven P. Meyer, Carlos I. Carrillo, Ball Eggleston PC, Lafayette, IN Attorneys for Appellant. Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court for resolution of the Defendants’ Motions to Suppress [Docs. 39; 42], and the Defendants’ Objections [Docs. 85; 86] to the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M & R”) [Doc. 82], For the reasons that follow, this Court will accept the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that the search of

OPINION BRADFORD, Judge. Appellant/Defendant Joey Wilson appeals his convictions for Receiving Stolen Auto Parts,1 a Class C felony, and Driving While Suspended,2 a Class A misdemean- or. Upon appeal, Wilson contends that the trial court erred in allowing the State to amend the charging information on the day before his trial was scheduled to begin

58 S.W.3d 718 (2001) Robert Paul WILSON, Jr. v. Martha Ruth WILSON. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Section, at Knoxville. February 26, 2001. Opinion Denying Petition for Rehearing April 24, 2001. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied October 8, 2001. *721 Michael Hickman, Maryville, TN, for appellan