Cases

29 B.R. 54 (1982) In re Charles Glenn WILSON and Carolyn Sue Wilson, Debtors. Charles Glenn WILSON and Carolyn Sue Wilson, Plaintiffs, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. ED 80-061, Adv. No. AP 81-537. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas, El Dorado Division. January 8, 1982. *55 Jack Sims, Little

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

PER CURIAM: * Plaintiffs-Appellants Ana Garcia De Beck (“Ana”), AGB Enterprises, Incorporated (“AGB”), San Antonio Dental Management Group (“Dental Management”), and San Antonio Dental Laboratory (“Dental Lab”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Third Party Defendants Robert Lee Beck (“Beck”) and JB Vega Corporation (“Vega”) appeal various aspects of the district court’s judgment (1) finding Beck l

314 F.3d 1367 Kimberly ADAMS, Dale Anderson, Jr., Kenneth Baalman, Patricia C. Ball, Debbie Barkman, Celeste B. Berry, Debra Billings, Linda Bland, Monica A. Boyd, Anita Brewster, Trenace R. Brown, George Burkel, Annette Brown-Burnett, Victoria R. Carthen, Jimmy Chan, Kathy Collier, Paul D. Collier, Racheal Collins, Joyce Dunlap, Elizabeth L. Eaglin, Maggie L. Ester, Juanita Esters, Kathleen Flynn, Carolyn Ford, Richard L. Frierdich, Jr., Michael G

BRYSON, Circuit Judge. A group of seasonal employees at the St. Louis, Missouri, offices of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) challenge the agency’s decision to place them in nonduty, nonpay status for two weeks each year. An arbitrator upheld the agency’s practice based on his conclusion that the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) regulations governing seasonal employment compelled the agency to release the employe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM E. POWELL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-2675 (JEB) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In one of its latest Opinions in this long-running Freedom of Information Act suit, the Court granted summary judgment to Defendant In

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WILSON, District Judge. This matter came on for trial before this Court on October 25, 1994, the Honorable Stephen V. Wilson, United States District Judge, presiding. Further proceedings were held on November 28, 1994 on the issue of whether the Internal Revenue Service sent a statutory notice of deficiency to plaintiff prior to the assessment of the 1

180 B.R. 670 (1995) Lynne M. MacELVAIN, Debtor/Appellant, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Appellee. Civ. A. No. 93-D-1230-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 31, 1995. *671 William B. Sellers, George W. Thomas, Samuel Kaufman, Montgomery, AL, for debtor/appellant. John Droscoll, Office of D

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM E. POWELL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-2675 (JEB) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff William E. Powell moves once again to supplement his Amended Complaint, which seeks records from the Internal Revenue Service co

COWEN, Circuit Judge: The Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), petitions this court to review an August 10, 2005, order by the Federal Labor Relations Authority (“FLRA”). The FLRA, along with the intervenor, the National Treasury Employees Union (“NTEU”), has cross-petitioned this court to enforce the FLRA’s order. For the following reasons, we will deny t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM E. POWELL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-2675 (JEB) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Over the years, pro se Plaintiff William E. Powell has employed a variety of means to require Defendant Internal Revenue Service to turn ov

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) TRUE THE VOTE, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 13-734 (RBW) v.

139 B.R. 9 (1991) In re J. Barry McLAUGHLIN, Debtor-Appellant, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al., Appellees. No. C89-604. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio. June 28, 1991. Howard E. Mentzer, Rajko Radonjich, Mentzer, Vuillemin & Robinson, Akron, Ohio, for appellant J. Barry McLaughlin. D. Patrick Mullarkey, Susan M. Poswistilo, U.S. Dept. of Justi

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge ' Plaintiff William E. Powell, proceeding pro se, filed this action in February 2017 as part of his ongoing quest for tax records relating to his family’s printing companies and a few of his forebears. The case, to date, has barely gotten o

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PROTECT THE PUBLIC’S TRUST, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-cv-340-RCL INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Protect the Public’s Trust (“PPT”) has moved the Court to assess an award of attorney’s fees and costs under the Freedom of Information

210 B.R. 134 (1997) In re Mary Dean JOHNSON, Debtor. Mary Dean JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 91-34377-D, Adversary No. 96-1223. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. June 16, 1997. William D. Wilson, Jr., Memphis, TN, for Debtor/Plaintiff. Barbara Morris Zoccola, Asst. U.S. Atty., Me

MEMORANDUM OPINION TURK, District Judge. This case is before the court on appeal from an order entered by The Honorable William E. Anderson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge, overruling appellant’s objection to the amended claim filed by the Internal Revenue Service. Upon careful consideration of the record, the applicable law, and the briefs submitted by counsel, the court finds that the B

ENTRY ON MOTION TO DISMISS WILLIAM T. LAWRENCE, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 36). The motion is fully briefed and the Court, being duly advised, GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the motion to the extent and for the reasons set forth below.1 I. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) CAUSE OF ACTION INSTITUTE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 14-1407 (EGS) ) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ) et al. ) ) Defe

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MICKEY DAN WILSON, Chief Judge. • On June 22, 1993, plaintiffs David Gerald Bishop and Nancy Cecile Bishop (“Mr. Bishop;” “Mrs. Bishop;” “debtors”) filed their complaint commencing this adversary proceeding against the United States of America ex rel. Internal Revenue Service (“USA”). The document was titled “Complaint to Determine Dischargeability of F