Cases

226 December 14, 2017 No. 64 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON J. L. WILSON and Justen A. Rainey, Petitioners, v. Ellen F. ROSENBLUM, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent. S065263 (Control) Mike FITZ

226 December 14, 2017 No. 64 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON J. L. WILSON and Justen A. Rainey, Petitioners, v. Ellen F. ROSENBLUM, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent. S065263 (Control) Mike FITZ

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED Fall 2025 Term September 10, 2025 ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK _____________________ INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

995 F.2d 1526 Anthony LaMARCA, Martin Saunders and Edwin Johnson,individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,and David Aldred, Steve H. Bronson, Jr., Eddie Cobb, RonDurrance, Wayne Epprecht, Michael Gordon and Billy JoeHarper, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.R.V. TURNER, individually in his former capacity asSuperintendent of Glades Correctional Institution, ChesterLambdin, in his official capaci

91 S.W.3d 617 (2002) Gregory A. LOWDERMILK and Mary Catherine Lowdermilk, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. VESCOVO BUILDING AND REALTY COMPANY, INC., Gary Vescovo, Robert Vescovo, Gundaker Real Estate Company, Inc., Larry D. Wilson, Jr., and Beth Gundaker-Lisk, Defendants/Respondents. No. ED 79055. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. June 18, 2002.

FILED Jun 14 2023, 9:46 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

BRYSON, Circuit Judge. This case comes to us on interlocutory appeal from the Court of Federal Claims. The plaintiffs in the underlying action claimed that the government breached its fiduciary obligations with respect to certain real property that the government was required to hold in trust for them. The order on appeal sets forth two questions of law as to which the trial c

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

Lewis v Rutkovsky (2017 NY Slip Op 06342) Lewis v Rutkovsky 2017 NY Slip Op 06342 Decided on August 29, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La

11/10/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 2, 2022 Session TONI BARRIOS ET AL. v. CHARLIE SIMPKINS ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Cheatham County No. 16245 Kelvin D. Jones, Judge1 No.

SMITH, Circuit Judge. Appellees are a class of former employees (“the employees”) of non-party Continental Express, Inc. (“Continental”). The employees brought a class action lawsuit against Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. (“Celadon”), alleging that Celadon violated the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. The district court

OPINION Opinion by: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice On February 10, 2016, we issued an opinion and- judgment in this appeal. On February 17, 2016, Appellants Irma Le-mus and Manuel Lemus Jr. filed a motion for rehearing. .Although we deny the motion for rehearing, on our own motion, we withdraw our opinion and judgment of February 10, 2016, and substitute this opinion and judgment in its stead.

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-18-00161-CV ABEST HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant v. FORT WORTH MAR-G, LTD, Appellee From the 249th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-C201700263

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARING CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE § 32310 UNCONSTITUTIONAL and ENJOINING ENFORCEMENT HON. ROGER T. BENITEZ, United States District Judge *1134Individual liberty and freedom are not outmoded concepts. "The judiciary is - and is often the only - protector of individual right

No. 19 May 31, 2024 363 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. STEPHEN ANDREW ARANDA, Respondent on Review. (CC 19CR07375) (CA A171800) (SC S069641) On review from the Court of Appeals.* Argued and submitted February 1, 2023. Patrick M. Ebbett, Assistant At

No. 19 May 31, 2024 363 19 372 Or State v. Aranda 2024 May 31, 2024 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. STEPHEN ANDRE

Gray H. Miller, United States District Judge Pending before the court are (1) a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and the Texas Citizens Participation Act ("TCPA") filed by defendants Radio Free Asia ("RFA"), Libby Liu, and Khanh Van Nguyen (Dkt. 18); (2) a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) and the TCPA filed by defendant Viet Tan, as an unincorporated association also known as Viet Nam Reform Part

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1751 Doc: 71 Filed: 07/31/2026 Pg: 1 of 28 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1751 CURTIS M. WHATELEY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GERALD F. LACKEY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Virginia

ORDER AND OPINION J. MICHELLE CHILDS, District Judge. Plaintiff Davoud Allen Eghbali (“Plaintiff’) filed this action pro se alleging that Defendant Department of Energy at the Savannah River National Lab (“Defendant”) subjected him to discrimination because of his place of national origin— Iran — in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 Ü.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17. (ECF No.

LEAHY, J. Appellant Stephen Sieglein (“Father”) and Appellee Laura Schmidt (“Mother”) were married in a religious ceremony in Havre de Grace, Maryland on April 12, 2008. Two years later, both parties enrolled in an “in vitro” fertilization plan and signed the contracts and documents necessary to participate.