Cases

778 N.E.2d 849 (2002) Toni E. WILSON, Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee. No. 49A02-0206-CV-456. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 21, 2002. *850 W. William Hodes, The William Hodes Professional Corp., Rafael Ramirez, Ramirez Law Office, P.C., Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. Karl L. Mulvane

515 F.Supp.2d 929 (2007) Susan L. GONSER, Plaintiff, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, CNA Group Life Assurance Company, the Hartford and Vulcan Materials Company, Defendants. No. 3:06CV00186-WRW. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division. September 27, 2007. *930 *931 M.

PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *489published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

190 S.W.3d 875 (2006) Donna ROSKEY, Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY; RSKCo Services, Inc.; RSKCo Cost Management Services, Inc.; RSKCo Consulting Services, Inc.; Machelle Davidson; Margie Kling; Carol Schellenberg; and Steve Wilson, Appellees. No. 05-05-00043-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. April 11, 2006. Rehearing Overruled May 15, 2006.

MEMORANDUM * We affirm the district court’s summary judgment. With respect to Century, the policy at issue is identical, in all material respects, to a policy adjudicated by the California Third Appellate District Court. Because the issues presented are identical to issues which were actually litigated and necessarily decided in a final decision on the merits to which plaintiffs were a

601 F.3d 306 (2010) WILLBROS RPI, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant, v. Lexington Insurance Company, Third Party Defendant-Appellant-Cross Appellee. No. 08-20665. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 16, 2010. *307</

USCA11 Case: 21-11758 Document: 68-1 Date Filed: 07/13/2023 Page: 1 of 30 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-11758 ____________________ CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE C

PER CURIAM: Barry S. Slakman appealed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Barbara F. Adamo, Sherwin Glass, and Continental Casualty Co. in Continental’s interpleader action. We issued an opinion in the case on April 2, 2003, in which we certified the following question to the Georgia Supreme Court: “WHETHER SECTION 33-25-13 OF THE CODE OF GEORGIA BARS AN INDIVIDUAL FROM RECEIVING

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2898 CARLTON GUNN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2898 CARLTON GUNN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2898 CARLTON GUNN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge. This case involves an excess legal malpractice insurance policy. Excess policies are written to provide coverage over and above that provided by a primary policy. Malpractice policies are issued in three forms: (1) “occurrence” policies cover acts of malpractice that occurred during the period of time for which the policy is writt

997 S.W.2d 893 (1999) Robert PETERSON, Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee. No. 01-98-000763-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). August 12, 1999. *894 Alton C. Todd, The Law Firm of Alton C. Todd, Alvin, for Appellant. John B. Wallace, Giessel, Barker & Lyman, P.C., Houston, for Appelle

MACK KIDD, Justice. Continental Casualty Company filed this declaratory judgment action 1 seeking an interpretation of provisions of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act against the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission (the “Commission”) and the Subsequent Injury Fund (the “Fund”) (collectively, the “Commission”).

PER CURIAM: Barry S. Slakman, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Barbara F. Adamo, Sherwin Glass, and Continental Casualty Co. in Continental’s interpleader action. The district court found that Slak-man was prohibited from recovering life insurance benefits under section 33-25-13

961 F.Supp. 1502 (1997) CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., Plaintiff, v. Patrick L. WESTERFIELD, representative of the estate of Frank O. Westerfield, and Charles Hempel, Defendants, and Patrick L. WESTERFIELD, representative of the estate of Frank O. Westerfield, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. INSURANCE CO. OF NORTH AMERICA, Interstate Fire & Casualty Co., United States Fire Insurance Co., Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., and St. Pau

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1648 CONTINENTAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, individually and as subrogee of The Linn Contracting Companies, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BII, INC., an Illinois Corporation doing business as Paramount Post, Defendant,

SIXTH DIVISION March 19, 2010 1-09-0502 CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, ) Appeal from Plaintiff-Appellee, ) the Circuit Court ) of Cook County v.

2023 IL App (1st) 221625 First District Third Division August 30, 2023 No. 1-22-1625 ) CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,

364 F.3d 1299 CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Barbara F. ADAMO, individually and in her capacity as Administrator of the Estate of Shana Slakman, Sherwin Glass, Defendants-Appellees,Barry S. Slakman, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02-15448 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April 1, 2004.