Cases

Opinion issued June 25, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00054-CV ——————————— ISRAEL SANCHEZ, Appellant V. BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Appe

599 F.3d 720 (2010) AL'S SERVICE CENTER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-3006. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 9, 2010. Decided March 26, 2010. *722 Robert A. Holstein, Attorney, Corey S. Berman (argued), Holstein Law O

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed August 28, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00564-CV REGINALD WARREN, REGINALD ROWE, AND FRED BULPITT, Appellants V. BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC. A/K/A BP TEXAS CITY AND BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC., Appellees On Appeal from the 122nd Distr

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ' Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge On December 19, 2014, the City of Neodesha, Kansas filed 821 complaints in Neodesha Municipal Court alleging that BP Corporation North America Inc., had violated the City waste ordinance.1 On January 28, 2015, BP filed notices of removal in the 821 cases. See Case Nos. 15-4025 through 15-4844 and 15-4847

ORDER These matters are before the court on the Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc filed by appellants Alkon, Frank, Holyoak, Martin, and Schulman in number 15-3228. Upon consideration, the panel grants in part, and only to the extent of the modifications contained in the attached revised Opinion, that part of the request seeking panel rehearing. The Opinion filed on August 23, 2017, is hereby withdrawn, and s

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment On Plaintiffs’ KCPA And Unjust Enrichment Claims (Doc. # 2705) filed November 1, 2011. Defendants argue that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law because Kansas law specifically authorizes the sale of motor fuel without disclosing or adjusting f

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 21, 2006 Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 21, 2006. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Filed 5/12/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO ROBERT SMITH, Plaintiff and Appellant, E073174 v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVDS1820485) BP LUBRICANTS USA INC. et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of Porsche Cars North America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Master Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 62), Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Master Consolidated Amend

Opinion issued February 7, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00794-CV ——————————— NANCY GOLDSTEIN, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF BP P.L.C., Appellant V. BP P.L.C.; BP AMERICA INC.; BP PRODUCT

355 F.Supp.2d 1182 (2005) CITY OF NEODESHA, KANSAS, individually and as representative of those persons and entities similarly situated, Plaintiff v. BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA INC., BP America Inc., BP Products North America Inc., BP America Production Company, Atlantic Richfield Company D/B/A Group Environmental Management Company, and Norm Bennett. Defendants No. 04-4150-SAC. United States Distric

Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Rendered in Part and Memorandum Opinion filed November , 2010 Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Rendered in Part and Majority Memorandum Opinion filed November 17, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Judgment rendered May 10, 2023. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,017-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, Plaint

282 S.W.3d 215 (2009) MIDLAND CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellants. No. 11-07-00048-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. March 26, 2009. *218 Matthew Tepper, Roy L. Armstrong & Kirk Swinney, McCreary, Veselka, Bragg & Allen, P.C., Rou

329 F.Supp.2d 853 (2004) SOUTHEAST TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL, L.L.C. and Regor Property, L.L.C., Plaintiffs, v. BP AMOCO CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. G-03-969. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. May 17, 2004. *854 Frank W. Mitchell, Maloney Martin & Mitchell, Houston, TX, for Southeast

Opinion filed March 26, 2009 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ____________ No. 11-07-00048-CV __________ MIDLAND CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellant/Cross-Appellee V. BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY ET AL, Appellees/Cross-Appellants

Opinion filed March 26, 2009

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal No. 18-16663 Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by D.C. Nos. and through the Oakland City 3:17-cv-06011-WHA Attorney; CITY AND COUNTY OF 3:17-cv-06012-WHA SAN FRANCISCO, a Municipal Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by ORDER AND and through the San Francisco AMENDED C

NO. 07-09-00059-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E JANUARY 31, 2011 OCCIDENTAL PERMIAN LTD., APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE v.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal No. 18-16663 Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by D.C. Nos. and through the Oakland City 3:17-cv-06011-WHA Attorney; CITY AND COUNTY OF 3:17-cv-06012-WHA SAN FRANCISCO, a Municipal Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by OPINION and through the San Francisco City Attorney Denni