Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

McHugh, J. On April 12, 2003, Alexander Pring-Wilson was involved in a physical altercation with Michael Colono, during which Colono suffered a fatal stab wound. The executrix of Colono’s estate, Cindy Guzman, commenced an action against Pring-Wilson for damages. In a jury-waived trial, a judge of the Superior Court found Pring-Wilson negligent and Colono comparatively negligent, then adjusted the award of damages accordingly. O

Opinion GOSWAMI, J. * — INTRODUCTION Defendant challenges his conviction on two counts of lewd and lascivious acts upon a child under 14 years old. As his sole contention on appeal, Defendant maintains the trial court prejudici

Opinion by JUDGE GRAHAM 1 Defendant, Luis Enrique Guzman-Rin-con, appeals the jury verdicts finding him guilty of six counts of attempted extreme indifference murder (crime of violence). Under the ctreumstances presented in this case, we conclude that defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel and his Fourteenth Amendment right to be present at critical stages of the proceedings were violated. Accordingly, we

195 P.3d 1130 (2008) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Uriel Antonio LINARES-GUZMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05CA2445. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III. June 26, 2008. Certiorari Denied November 17, 2008. *1133 John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Sean A. Moynihan, Assistant Attorney G

PER CURIAM: I. BACKGROUND Marina Guzman-Munoz, a native and citizen of Peru, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) order denying her motion to reopen her removal proceedings under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA), Pub.L. No. 103-322, tit. IV, 108 Stat.1902 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 8, 16, 28, and 42 U.S.C). Guzman-Munoz had originally sought relief un

700 S.E.2d 148 (2010) STATE of North Carolina v. Steve WILSON. No. COA10-268. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. October 19, 2010. *149 Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General M. Elizabeth Guzman, for the State. Paul F. Herzog, Fayetteville, for defendant-appellant. BRYANT, Judge. Where a

SUMMARY ORDER In 1992, petitioner-appellant Gandhi Guzman was convicted on two counts of second-degree murder and sentenced to consecutive 25-years-to-life prison terms. During jury selection in advance of trial, Guzman, objecting to the state’s use of peremptory challenges against black venire members, alleged a violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). The trial judge rejected his

Opinion SPENCER, P. J. Introduction The trial court placed defendant Roberto S. Guzman on drug treatment probation pursuant to Proposition 36 in two separate cases. Defendant thereafter failed to comply with any of the trial court’s directives. He did not report to the drug treatment center or to his probation officer. He instead left the country, absconding from the jurisdiction of the tr

955 S.W.2d 85 (1997) Joe Rivera GUZMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 190-94. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. September 24, 1997. Mark Darrow Wilson, Austin, for appellant. *86 Robert Smith, Asst. Dist. Atty., Austin, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State. Before the court en

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. Introduction In 2003, two young men were involved in a violent and tragic altercation in Cambridge, Massachusetts. One of the men, eighteen-year-old Michael Colono, died. The other man, Alexander Pring-Wilson, a Harvard graduate student, became mired in a nearly decade-long, multi-action legal struggle. Most recently, i

*7ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR DISCOVERY ALEXANDER, United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants collectively filed a pretrial discovery motion that listed a variety of information they sought from the government. The government, in response, noted those areas of discovery where (a) it had produced the requested information, (b) it would produce the reque

778 F.Supp.2d 116 (2011) FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Farmers Insurance Exchange, Plaintiffs, v. Alexander PRING-WILSON, Cindy Guzman, as Executrix of the Estate of Michael Colono, Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-11420-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 9, 2011. *118 William A. Schneider, Steven M. Couch, Morr

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-24-00385-CV Carol G. LANGE, Appellant v. Antonio GUZMAN, Jr. and Belinda Patricia Guzman, Appellees F

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00385-CV Carol G. LANGE, Appellant v. Antonio GUZMAN, Jr. and Belinda Patricia Guzman,

Appellate Case: 22-1322 Document: 010111072019 Date Filed: 06/28/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 28, 2024

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Petitioner, v. Guadalupe Guzman Morales, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2021-000622 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Lancaster County Roger E. Henderson Circuit Court Judge, Opinion No. 28154 Heard January 12, 2023 – Fi

[Cite as State v. Guzman, 2021-Ohio-2168.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SENECA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 13-21-03 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. MICHAEL A. GUZMAN, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Tiffin-Fostoria Municipal Court

PER CURIAM. The district court found appellant guilty of possessing less than twenty-eight grams of heroin and assessed punishment at imprisonment for twenty years. Texas Controlled Substances Act, Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115 (West 1992). In two points of error, appellant urges that the heroin was unlawfully seized and that the court erred by admitting it in evide

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALEJANDRO GUZMAN, Defendant and Appellant. S242244 Second Appellate District, Division Three B265937 Los Angeles County Superior Court BA420611 December 5, 2019 Chi