Cases

Deen, Presiding Judge. On the evening of February 2, 1983, the appellee, Blinda Diane Neal, went to the residence of the appellant, John Edward Willis, allegedly to have him repair her car. It was raining when she arrived, and Willis asked her to help him dry off another wet car that he had driven into his one-car garage. As she proceeded to dry the passenger side of the car with a towel, she slipped and fell on a mixture of

RITA W. GRUBER, Chief Judge Appellants, the unknown heirs of Nathaniel Neal and Emaline Neal, appeal from an order of the Sevier County Circuit Court that denied their motion for summary judgment and granted the motion for summary judgment filed by appellees Jerry and Judy Pickett (the Picketts) and Professional Land Title Company (ProLand). Appellants raise five points on appeal.1 However, we cannot re

OPINION AND ORDER1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Dyck-O’Neal, Inc.’s (“DONI”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 87), to which Plaintiffs respond in opposition (Doc. 92). The parties also filed supplement briefs and authorities. (Doc. 95; Doe. 96; Doc. 97; Doc. 98). After considering the parties’

OPINION VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge. Appellant Catherine Willis appeals the final decision of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granting University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh’s (“Children’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment on her Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”) and Pen

307 F.Supp.2d 1236 (2004) Joseph Wyatt WILLIS, Plaintiff, v. Don SIEGELMAN, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.02-A-554-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 3, 2004. *1237 Joseph (Jay) Brady Lewis, The Law Office of Jay Lewis, Montgomery, AL, for Joseph Wyatt Willis, plaintiff. Mose W. Stuart,

MEMORANDUM * Yinnie Chieco, an independent copywriter, successfully sued Lands’ End and Willis & Geiger, a now defunct subsidiary of Lands’ End, for copyright infringement. The jury awarded Chieco zero dollars in actual damages and $32,700 in statutory damages. Chieco appeals various rulings by the district court relating primarily to his claim for damages. We AFFIRM. First, Chieco arg

********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and argument before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence or rehear the parties or their representatives. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms, with some modifications, the Opinion and Award of the Deput

315 Ga. 19 FINAL COPY S22A0801. WILLIS v. THE STATE. PINSON, Justice. Stephen Willis was convicted along with four co-defendants of crimes arising from the shooting death of Nicholas Hagood.1 On 1 The crimes occurred on April 16, 2014. On July 18, 2014, a Fulton County grand jury indicted Willis and four co-defendants—Tavius Bates, Demetrius Fortson, Octavious Jordan, and Jeremy Southern—on eight counts each: malice murder, armed robbery, felony murde

469 S.E.2d 733 (1996) 220 Ga. App. 348 WILLIS et al. v. BRASSELL. No. A95A2089. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 27, 1996. *735 Zachary & Segraves, J. Ed Segraves, Decatur, for appellants. Cashin, Morton & Mullins, James M. Sherman, Atlanta, O'Neal, Brown & Sizemore, John C. Clark,

355 B.R. 777 (2006) In re Braxton Mansel GRAY and Karen Jane Gray, Debtors. Thomas J. O'Neal, Plaintiff, v. Jim Arnold, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-61922, Adversary No. 06-6067. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri. November 14, 2006. *778 David E. Schroeder, David Schroeder Law Offices, PC, Springfield, MO, for Deb

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication except for parts I, II(A), II(B) and II(D) and the heading for part III. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1116 OPINION PROCEDURAL HIST

PHELAN, J. In this case, Y. D. Stoudenmeier, wbo was one of tbe payees in tbe note, and also one of tbe makers or payors, assigned bis interest to another one of tbe payees, who instituted suit against 'Willis, wbo was one of the makers of tbe note, omitting to sue Y. D. Stouden-meier, tbe other maker. These facts were pleaded in bar of tbe action, and to this plea there was a demurrer, which tbe court sustained. This presents t

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

Ruffin, Presiding Judge. Dorian Willis obtained a workers’ compensation award against his employer, McClain Industries of Georgia, Inc., and its insurer. Pursuant to OCGA § 34-9-106, Willis petitioned the Bibb County Superior Court to enforce the award. The superior court denied the petition, and this appeal ensued. For reasons that follow, we affirm. The relevant facts show that on May 8, 2001, an admini

400 F.Supp.2d 134 (2005) Besseye NEAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTOR, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-2420 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2005. *135 Ted Justice Williams, Avis E. Buchanan, DC, Public Defender Service, Jeffrey Fred Liss, Mary Elizab

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs, inmates sentenced under Georgia's recidivist statute, O.C.G.A. § 17-10-7(c), brought a section 1983 suit alleging that the Georgia parole board's decision to eliminate Plaintiffs' parole eligibility violated the Ex Post Facto Clause, and alternatively, the Due Process Clause. The magistrate judge granted summary judgment for Plaintiffs. We vacate a

Opinion TURNER, P. J. Procedural History Defendants, Willie Neal and Patrick Shelton, appeal from multiple convictions for a series of armed robberies which they committed at various places during January of 1991. They were jointly charged by an amended information with 17 counts (1 through 6, 8 through 10, 13 through 15, 17 through 20, and 22) of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211),

802 S.W.2d 337 (1990) Barry O'Neal WILLIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 05-85-00569-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. November 29, 1990. Rehearing Denied January 9, 1991. Discretionary Review Refused April 24, 1991. *338 Charles Tessmer, Dallas, for appellant. Patri

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John P. Collins, J.), rendered June 12, 1990, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a predicate felony offender, to a term of imprisonment of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed. Overwhelming evidence at trial demonstrated that defendant, his codefendant brother, and a third person, simultaneously shot at Felix Almanzar and Leonard Irizarr

790 S.W.2d 307 (1990) Barry O'Neal WILLIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 155-87. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. May 16, 1990. *308 Charles Tessmer, Dallas, for appellant. John Vance, Dist. Atty., and Patricia Poppoff Noble, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, fo