⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Williamson v. Litigation Practice Group PC”

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2021-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued May 27, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00336-CV ——————————— DEZZIE BRUMFIELD, JOE ADAMO, JULIA ADAMS, NANCY ALLEN, ANDREW ANDERSON, BEVERLY ANDERSON, ONYEMA ANOZIE, WHITLEY ARRINGTON, SHARON BACON, KOLAWOLE BAKARE, LONNIE C
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2015-09-18 · Published · cited 1× · 131 F. Supp. 3d 580; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125067; 2015 WL 5534297
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KEITH STARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on various motions filed by Defendants, specifically, Defendant Michael A. Pohl’s, Individually and d/b/a.the Law Office of Michael A. Pohl, Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b) (“Pohl’s Motion to Dismiss”) [25],- Jimmy Williamson and Jimmy Williamson P.C.
Stone v. Williamsonpublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 2008-07-23 · Published · cited 13× · 753 N.W.2d 106; 482 Mich. 144
753 N.W.2d 106 (2008) Carl STONE and Nancy Stone, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. David A. WILLIAMSON, M.D., Jackson Radiology Consultants, P.C., and W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital, Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 133986. Calendar No. 4. Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued January 8, 2008. Decided July 24, 2008. *107 Ferr
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE MDL Dkt. No. 1869 ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. I) Miscellaneous No. 07-489 (MDL I) Judge Beryl A. Howell IN RE RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017-01-18 · Published · cited 64× · 846 F.3d 71; 2017 A.M.C. 1; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 849; 2017 WL 192704
OPINION OF THE COURT SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge. Ocean common carriers transport cargo between foreign countries and the United States. In this case, Plaintiffs 1 used the services of such carriers to transport vehicles. Some plaintiffs made arrangements with and received vehicles directly from the car
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014-09-04 · Published · cited 13× · 42 F. Supp. 3d 231; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126954; 2014 WL 4370333
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case, arising under the federal antitrust laws and state analogues, presents a *240challenge to the use of reverse payment settlements in patent litigation. Reverse payment settlements are agreements to settle patent infringement litigation under which t
District Court, S.D. California · 2011-08-05 · Published · cited 0× · 807 F. Supp. 2d 928; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86844; 2011 WL 3474702
807 F.Supp.2d 928 (2011) In re CELL TOWER LITIGATION. Case No. 07cv399 BEN (WVG). United States District Court, S.D. California. August 5, 2011. *933 Charles Jason McLurkin, Robert Jystad, Jamie Thomas Hall, Julian Killen Quattlebaum, III, Channel Law Group LLP, Long Beach, CA, Christine M. Leone, Christine M. Leone, Office of the City A
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-05-01 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. Case No. 1:22-mc-54 (RJL/GMH) MATCH GROUP, INC., Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In March 2020, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Petitioner”)
District Court, S.D. California · 2011-11-23 · Published · cited 5× · 830 F. Supp. 2d 996; 2011 WL 5873113; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135602
*1002ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. Currently before the Court are two motions: (1) Defendant Peter Leparulo’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Doc. No. 289; and (2) a Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. No. 290, by
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009-09-29 · Published · cited 29× · 67 A.D.3d 213; 886 N.Y.S.2d 714
OPINION OF THE COURT Eng, J. *215The late Harry Frankson began smoking cigarettes in 1954, when he was 13 years old. Frankson soon became a heavy smoker, smoking at least a pack of cigarettes a day over the next 40 years. The brand Frankson regularly smoked throughout his life was Lucky Strikes, originally manufactured by the American Tobacco Compan
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2011-08-09 · Published · cited 4× · 802 F. Supp. 2d 740; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92706; 2011 WL 3563004
802 F.Supp.2d 740 (2011) In re VIOXX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates To All Cases. MDL No. 1657. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. August 9, 2011. *758 ORDER & REASONS ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge. The Court has previously determined the value of the common bene
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011-01-24 · Published · cited 35× · 273 F.R.D. 399; 2011 WL 197967; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17503
JAMES G. CARR, District Judge. This discovery dispute arises out of litigation related to the manufacture and sale of contaminated heparin in 2007. Pending is plaintiffs’ motion to compel defendants Baxter International, Inc. and Baxter Healthcare Corp. (Baxter) to produce documents pursuant to plaintiffs’ Third Set of Requests for Production (RFP).1 [Doc. 317]. Plaintiffs als
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2010-08-04 · Published · cited 1× · 730 F. Supp. 2d 804; 2010 WL 3083806
730 F.Supp.2d 804 (2010) In re SOUTHEASTERN MILK ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: Food Lion, LLC, et al. v. Dean Foods Company, et al., No. 2:07-CV-188. Master File No. 2:08-MD-1000. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Greeneville Division. August 4, 2010. *808 Thomas S. Scott, Jr., Ball & Scott Law O
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010-04-27 · Published · cited 7× · 709 F. Supp. 2d 1323; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51811; 2010 WL 1737107
709 F.Supp.2d 1323 (2010) In re TRASYLOL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION— MDL-1928. This Document Relates To: All Actions. Case No. 08-MD-01928. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 27, 2010. *1324 Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt Johnson Osborne & LeClainche, John Scarola, Brenda S. Fulmer, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &am;
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-06-23 · Published · cited 31× · 27 F. Supp. 3d 447; 2014 WL 2815645; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86765
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. INTRODUCTION On March 29, 2013, we issued a Memorandum and Order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’1 complaints, which alleged that they suffered injury based on the defendants’ manipulation of the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). In re LIBOR-Base
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010-08-16 · Published · cited 889× · 618 F.3d 300; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17107; 2010 WL 3211147
618 F.3d 300 (2010) In re INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION OptiCare Health Systems, Inc., Comcar Industries, Inc., Sunburst Hospitality Corporation, Robert Mulcahy, Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, Glenn Singer, Redwood Oil Company, Omni Group of Companies, Bayou Steel Corporation, Clear Lam Packaging, Inc., Cellect, LLC, Enclave, LLC, Gateway Club Apartments, Ltd., Michigan Multi-King, Inc., City of Stamford, Belmont
District Court, N.D. California · 2009-03-31 · Published · cited 29× · 643 F. Supp. 2d 1133; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38941; 2009 WL 1096602
643 F.Supp.2d 1133 (2009) In re FLASH MEMORY ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Actions. Case No. C 07-0086 SBA. United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division. March 31, 2009. *1137 Christopher Thomas Micheletti, Craig C. Corbitt, Francis Onofrei Scarpulla, Henry A. Cirillo, Judith A. Zahid, Zelle Ho
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007-07-06 · Published · cited 11× · 496 F. Supp. 2d 1195; 2007 WL 2007987
496 F.Supp.2d 1195 (2007) In re WILLIAMS SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Pertains To: WCG Subclass. Nos. 02-cv-072-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-077-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-078-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-080-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-081-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-083-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-093-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-095-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-097-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-107-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-113-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-120-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-124-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-130-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-132-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-135-SPF-FHM, 02-cv-139-SPF-FHM,
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-03-29 · Published · cited 20× · 935 F. Supp. 2d 666; 2013 WL 1285338
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. I. Introduction These cases arise out of the alleged manipulation of the London .InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), an interest rate benchmark that has been. called “the world’s most important number.” British Bankers’ Ass’n, BBA LIBOR: The World’s Most Important Number Now Tweets Daily (May 21, 2009), http://www
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-07-20 · Published · cited 34× · 829 F.3d 1068; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13242; 2016 WL 3913445
OPINION FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judge: The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) requires that within five days of “the initial communication” with a consumer about the collection of a debt, a debt collector must send the consumer a notice containing specified disclosures. 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a). The question presented here is whether the phrase “the