Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Williamson v. Garland”
Williamson Ex Rel. Williamson v. Garlandpublic domain
402 S.W.2d 80 (1966) Dennis Neal WILLIAMSON, By and Through his next friend, Jess J. Williamson, etc., Appellants, v. Raymond GARLAND, Appellee. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. February 11, 1966 Rehearing Denied May 20, 1966. Albert Karnes, Paducah, for appellants. Earl T. Shoup, Paducah, for appellee. DAVIS, Commissioner. Dennis Neal Williamson,
United States v. Jeffrey Williamsonpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge Srinivasan. Srinivasan, Circuit Judge: Jeff Henry Williamson was convicted of threatening to murder a federal law enforcement officer. Williamson raises several challenges to his conviction and sentence in this appeal. We reject most of his challenges, except that we remand the case to the district court to give William
Leaphart v. Williamsonpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. Catherine Leaphart brings this action against the previous Mayor and City Council members of Russellville, Arkansas, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (2006); 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006); 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006); and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 623(a) (West 2008), alleging that the d
Catherine Leapheart v. Tyrone Williamsonpublic domain
MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Catherine Leapheart sued the former Mayor of the City of Russellville, Arkansas, and the members of the Russellville City Council in federal district court, alleging age and race discrimination. The City Council members (hereinafter “Defendants”) filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting legislative immunity with respect to the claims against them in
VanDerStok v. Garlandpublic domain
Case: 23-10718 Document: 00516963058 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/09/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED November 9, 2023
Rudnitskyy v. Garlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PETR VASILYEVICH No. 21-1098 RUDNITSKYY, Agency No. Petitioner, A094-534-740 v. OPINION MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submi
Garcia v. Garlandpublic domain
20-1641-ag Garcia v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2021 No. 20-1641 ANTONIO LUNA GARCIA, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Quituizaca v. Garlandpublic domain
19-3470-ag Quituizaca v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2021 ARGUED: JANUARY 18, 2022 DECIDED: NOVEMBER 1, 2022 No. 19-3470-ag XAVIER PUCHA QUITUIZACA,
Williamson v. Analytics Consulting LLC.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTOPHER EUGENE WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-1403 (JEB) v. ANALYTICS CONSULTING LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff Christopher Eugene Williamson, an Instacart driver, brought this action to recover a $300 payment that h
Brathwaite v. Garlandpublic domain
20-27 Brathwaite v. Garland 1 IN THE 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 ________ 5 AUGUST TERM 2020 6 7 ARGUED: JANUARY 5, 2021 8 DECIDED: JULY 1, 2021 9 10 No. 20-27 11 12 ALDWI
Estrada-Cardona v. Garlandpublic domain
Appellate Case: 21-9562 Document: 010110725741 Date Filed: 08/17/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 17, 2022
Harris v. Franklin-Williamson Human Services, Inc.public domain
97 F.Supp.2d 892 (2000) Marcia HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. FRANKLIN-WILLIAMSON HUMAN SERVICES, INC., Laborers' International Union of North America, Southern Illinois Laborers' District Council, Randall J. Mayhew, Defendants. No. CIV. A. 98-4290-DRH. United States District Court, S.D. Illinois. May 11, 2000. *893
Jane DiCocco v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 20-1342 Doc: 29 Filed: 11/17/2021 Pg: 1 of 47 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1342 JANE D. DICOCCO, MD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice
Jane DiCocco v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 20-1342 Doc: 29 Filed: 11/17/2021 Pg: 1 of 47 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1342 JANE D. DICOCCO, MD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice
Twitter, Inc. v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TWITTER, INC., No. 20-16174 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:14-cv- v. 04480-YGR MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General; UNITED STATES OPINION DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; CHRISTOPHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVEST
Jane DiCocco v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 20-1342 Doc: 29 Filed: 11/17/2021 Pg: 1 of 47 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1342 JANE D. DICOCCO, MD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice
Manuel Hernandez v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MANUEL ANTONIO HERNANDEZ, No. 20-70158 AKA Manuel Antonio Hernandez, Petitioner, Agency No. A073-897-003 v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review
Jean Pugin v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 20-1363 Doc: 51 Filed: 11/30/2021 Pg: 1 of 63 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20−1363 JEAN FRANCOIS PUGIN, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.
Jean Pugin v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20−1363 JEAN FRANCOIS PUGIN, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Argued: March 9, 2021 Decided: November 30
Jane DiCocco v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1342 JANE D. DICOCCO, MD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia at Richmond. J