⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Williams v. Wilson”

Williams v. Wilsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-05-26 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 2800; 207 L. Ed. 2d 140
The application for stay presented to Justice Sotomayor and by her referred to the Court denied. The Government is seeking a stay only of the District Court's April 22 preliminary injunction. But on May 19, the District Court issued a new order enforcing *2801the preliminary injunction and imposing additional measures. The Government has not sought review of or a stay
Williams v. Wilsonpublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015-10-23 · Published · cited 0× · 221 So. 3d 1081; 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1398; 2015 WL 13543280
Affirmed.
Williams v. Wilsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013-10-21 · Published · cited 0× · 543 F. App'x 307
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Elton Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Williams’ 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible erro
Williams v. Wilsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-12-02 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 685; 187 L. Ed. 2d 555; 82 U.S.L.W. 3329; 571 U.S. 1074; 2013 WL 5298070; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8736
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011-04-14 · Published · cited 2× · 2011 Ohio 1805
[Cite as Williams v. Wilson-Walker, 2011-Ohio-1805.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95392 THOMAS E. WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
Williams v. Wilsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002-04-29 · Published · cited 11× · 563 S.E.2d 320; 349 S.C. 336; 2002 S.C. LEXIS 71
349 S.C. 336 (2002) 563 S.E.2d 320 Greg WILLIAMS and Bill Wines, individually and as trustees and members of The Christian Church of North Myrtle Beach, and as representatives of others similarly situated as members of The Christian Church of North Myrtle Beach, Harrill Lovelace and Clay Crowder, individually and as members of The Christian Church of North Myrtle Beach, and as representatives of others similarly situated as member
Williams v. Wilsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000-05-30 · Published · cited 2× · 533 S.E.2d 593; 341 S.C. 136; 2000 S.C. App. LEXIS 86
341 S.C. 136 (2000) 533 S.E.2d 593 Greg WILLIAMS and Bill Wines, Individually, and as Trustees and Members of The Christian Church of North Myrtle Beach, and as Representatives of Others Similarly Situated as Members of The Christian Church of North Myrtle Beach, Harrill Lovelace and Clay Crowder, Individually and as Members of The Christian Church of North Myrtle Beach, and as Representatives of other Similarly Situated as Member
Williams v. Wilsonpublic domain
Kentucky Supreme Court · 1998-04-16 · Published · cited 118× · 972 S.W.2d 260; 1998 Ky. LEXIS 63; 1998 WL 178674
972 S.W.2d 260 (1998) Teri C. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Patricia Lynn Herald WILSON, Appellee. No. 96-SC-1122-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. April 16, 1998. Rehearing Denied August 27, 1998. Benjamin J. Hays, Elizabeth M. Linville, Mark A. Matics, Hays & Hays, Winchester, Kevin J. Hable, Virginia H. Snell, Jean W. Bird, Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs,
Williams v. Wilsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996-08-12 · Published · cited 1× · 95 F.3d 1149; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 23548; 1996 WL 481281
95 F.3d 1149 Williamsv.Wilson NO. 95-50781 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug 12, 1996 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex., 939 F.Supp. 543, No. SA-94-CA-504 2 AFFIRMED.
Williams v. Wilsonpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Texas · 1995-08-17 · Published · cited 4× · 939 F. Supp. 543; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21333; 1995 WL 901078
939 F.Supp. 543 (1995) Glenn L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. Richard L. WILSON, International Celebrity Showclubs, Inc., Pet Productions, Inc., and Penthouse International, Inc., Defendants. Civil No. SA-94-CA-0504. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. August 17, 1995. *544 *545
Williams v. Wilsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 36 F.3d 95; 1994 WL 523468
36 F.3d 95 Williamsv.Wilson*** NO. 94-8021 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Sept 14, 1994 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. 2 AFFIRMED.
Williams v. Wilsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1993-12-13 · Published · cited 0× · 510 U.S. 1027
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2002-01-08 · Published · cited 0× · 63 S.W.3d 650; 2002 Mo. LEXIS 2; 2002 WL 15923
WILLIAM RAY PRICE, Jr., Judge. Dean Williams pled guilty to felony counts of drug possession and trafficking in the second degree. On March 6, 2001, the circuit court for the city of St. Louis entered a judgment and sentence against Williams on both counts. After the sentence was announced, the state sought to set aside Williams’ guilty plea because the sentence of the court was not what the state had recommended. The court
Williams v. Wilsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1993-12-13 · Published · cited 0× · 510 U.S. 1027; 114 S. Ct. 642
510 U.S. 1027 Williamsv.Wilson et al. No. 93-6434. Supreme Court of United States. December 13, 1993. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 6th Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 4 F. 3d
Wilson v. Williamspublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-09-25 · Published · cited 0× · 254 So. 3d 954
Dismissed.
Wilson v. Williamspublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-03-20 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRYAN K. WILSON, Petitioner, v. Case No. 16-cv-01018 (CRC) CHARLES WILLIAMS, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER Bryan Wilson was convicted in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia of first- degree premeditated murder and several related
Wilson v. Williamspublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2016-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 136 S. Ct. 1728; 194 L. Ed. 2d 809
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner allowed until May 16, 2016, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020-06-09 · Published · cited 522× · 961 F.3d 829
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0179p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CRAIG WILSON, ERIC BELLAMY, KENDAL NELSON, and ┐ MAXIMINO NIEVES, on behalf of themselves and all │ others similarly situated, │
Williams v. Wilsonpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982-12-29 · Published · cited 0× · 424 So. 2d 159; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22059
WENTWORTH, Judge. Appellant, as administrator of the Florida State Hospital, seeks review of three orders whereby petitions for continued involuntary confinement were denied. The orders indicate that the hearing officer did not restrict herself to consideration of the relevant criteria for involuntary confinement; we therefore reverse the orders appealed and remand the cause for further proceedings. Secti
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019-06-19 · Published · cited 0×
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, June 10, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0477. PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS COMMISSION v. SAJUANA WILSON- WILLIAMS. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed