Cases

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

52 So.3d 905 (2011) Flora WILLIAMS v. James STEWART, Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriffs Department, City of New Orleans. No. 2010-C-2598. Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 14, 2011. Denied. VICTORY, J, would grant

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

In re Gusman, Sheriff Marlin N.; Stewart, James et al.; —Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. L, No. 04-15103; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-CA-0457. Denied. VICTORY, J., would grant.

08/17/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 27, 2017 Session SONJA BROYLES WILLIAMS v. STEWART ASHLEY WILLIAMS Direct Appeal from the General Sessions Court for Hardin County No. GS5446 Larry McKenzie, Judge, Sitting by Interchange No. W2016-01602-COA-R3-C

46 So.3d 266 (2010) Flora WILLIAMS v. James STEWART, Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff's Department, City of New Orleans. No. 2010-CA-0457. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. September 22, 2010. Rehearing Denied October 21, 2010. *268 W. James Singleton, The Singleton Law Firm, Shreveport, LA, for Lucky

PER CURIAM: Lee Robert Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000) because it was filed beyond the applicable statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Stewart, No. CA-04-567 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2005). We disp

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RONALD TURNEY WILLIAMS,  No. 01-99015 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. TERRY L. STEWART, Director of  CV 95-01687-RCB ORDER AND Arizona Department of AMENDED Corrections, OPIN

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RONALD TURNEY WILLIAMS,  Petitioner-Appellant, No. 01-99015 v. TERRY L. STEWART, Director of  D.C. No. CV 95-01687-RCB Arizona Department of OPINION Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

113 P.3d 345 (2005) 137 N.M. 522 2005-NMCERT-005 WILLIAMS v. STEWART No. 29,167 (COA 23,730) Supreme Court of New Mexico May 10, 2005. Denial of Certiorari.

2005 NMCA 061 ERMELINDA WILLIAMS, NASARIO LOPEZ, LILLIAN STARZYK, OLIVAMA SANDOVAL, and ERLINDA TRUJILLO, on their own behalves and as Representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MICHAEL W. STEWART, M.D., Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 23,730. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. Corrected: June 8, 2005. Certiorari Denied, No.

VIGIL, Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part). {42} I concur with the majority opinion in all respects except its conclusion that the fraud claims were properly dismissed. Defendants obtained dismissal of the fraud claims pursuant to Rule 1 — 012(b)(6) NMRA on the basis that damages in a fraud action are limited to pec

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.

WILNER, Chief Judge. The issue before us is whether the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County erred in reinstating a judgment against appellants. The argument is that the court was precluded by the doctrine of res judicata from taking such action. We find no merit in appellants’ assertion. Procedural History And Underlying Facts In September, 1985, Johanna Stewart fi

PITTMAN, Judge. Angie E. Stewart appealed to the Supreme Court of Alabama from a judgment of the Baldwin Circuit Court that awarded Richard F. Williams $59,500 in damages for Stewart’s slander of title to property owned by Williams. The supreme court transferred the appeal to this court pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala.Code 1975. We reverse. On September 25, 2008, Williams filed a complaint alleging that Stew

CAMPBELL, Judge. This appeal is an outgrowth of the same proceeding in the trial court that resulted in our decision of this same date also styled Williams v. Stewart, 424 So.2d 204 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). We suggest reference to that decision for a full discussion of the facts involved here. In this appeal, appellants seek reversal of the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to appellee pursuant t

424 So.2d 204 (1983) Jack Y. WILLIAMS and G. Rita Ala, Appellants, v. John J. STEWART, Appellee. No. 82-32. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. January 5, 1983. Joseph R. Miele, St. Petersburg, for appellant Williams. Jack S. Carey of Carey & Harrison, St. Petersburg, for appellant Ala. James E. Deakyne, Jr. and Robert F. Nunez, S

145 Ariz. 602 (1985) 703 P.2d 546 Charles Lynn WILLIAMS, By and Through his guardian and natural mother, Mildred R. WILLIAMS; and Mildred R. Williams, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Don STEWART, an individual; Don Stewart, as owner of Don Stewart Miracle Valley Church; Don Stewart, as owner of Don Stewart Evangelistic Association Incorporated; Don Stewart Evangelistic Association, Incorporated; Don Stewart Evangelistic Associat

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 550 MAL 2022 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

Underwood, Judge. Our judgment in Williams v. Stewart, 147 Ga. App. 841 (250 SE2d 515) (1978), having been reversed pursuant to writ of certiorari in Stewart v. Williams, 243 Ga. 580 is now vacated, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with the judgment and opinion of the Supreme Court. Judgment affirmed. Banke and Birdsong,