⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Williams v. Steube”

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2019-07-18 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 18, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00262-CV BLAYNE D. WILLIAMS, SR., Appellant V. CITY OF AUSTIN, Appellee On Appeal from the 98th District Court Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 1988-05-04 · Published · cited 13× · 752 S.W.2d 610; 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 952; 1988 WL 41596
752 S.W.2d 610 (1988) Ed MORIARTY, Appellant, v. Clayton W. WILLIAMS, Jr., and Claydesta Communications, Inc., Appellees. No. 08-87-00324-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. May 4, 1988. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1988. *611 Philip C. Short, DuBose & Short, Houston, for appellant. Donald E. Godwin, M
In re Steubepublic domain
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · 1913-07-01 · Published · cited 0× · 16 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 401
Rogers, J. Petitioner was arrested for violation of Section 6418-1, General Code, as amended March 29th, 1913 (Yol. 103 O. L., 136), relative to sales of specified articles, commonly known as the “sales-by-weight” statute. The substance of the charge in the affidavit, pursuant to which the arrest was made, is that petitioner sold about one-fourth peck of Irish potatoes other than by avoirdupois weight or numerical count to t
Ladd v. Williamspublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904-02-16 · Published · cited 0× · 104 Mo. App. 390; 79 S.W. 511; 1904 Mo. App. LEXIS 495
BLAND, P. J. In substance, the petition alleges that on the — day of March, 1899, plaintiffs were the owners of six head of cattle with their increase and seventy-five head of hogs with their increase, of the value of twelve hundred and fifty dollars; that after-wards, on the — day of March, 1899, the defendant wrongfully took possession of all said property and unlawfully converted it to her own use to plaintiffs’ damage in the
Idaho Supreme Court · 1985-11-19 · Published · cited 16× · 710 P.2d 566; 109 Idaho 656; 1985 Ida. LEXIS 586
710 P.2d 566 (1985) 109 Idaho 656 Frank M. SPRAGUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BURLEY In the State of Idaho, Richard Thompson, Mike Schiers and Les Steube, Defendants-Respondents. No. 15604. Supreme Court of Idaho. November 19, 1985. *568 Gara Louise Newman, Rupert, for plaintiff-appellant. Wil
Dunlap v. Crewspublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014-06-03 · Published · cited 0× · 138 So. 3d 1226; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8553; 2014 WL 2500802
PER CURIAM. The issue on appeal is whether funds transferred from Ted E. Dunlap’s personal banking account to his inmate trust fund by a third party with power of attorney are exempt from the lien provision in section 945.6037, Florida Statutes, because those funds were allegedly disability benefits payments from The Department of Veteran Affairs, which are exempt under Rule 38-203.201, Florida Administrative Code. The Secon
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2022-12-01 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-21-00310-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG KENNETH HAHN, Appellant, v. CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, Appellee. On appeal from the 267th District Court of DeWitt C
Texas Supreme Court · 2024-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 23-0024 ══════════ ConocoPhillips Company, Petitioner, v. Kenneth Hahn, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth Dist
United States Circuit Court · 2019-06-20 · Published · cited 2× · 390 F. Supp. 3d 1323
JEFFREY U. BEAVERSTOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation *1324(Doc. 30), and Defendant A & G's Objection (Doc. 31). After de novo review of the record, and the benefit of oral argument on May 17, 2019, this Court REMANDS the action.<
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2017-10-26 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-16-00336-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG KENNETH HAHN, Appellant, v. WIILLIAM PAUL GIPS, LUCILLE FAY GIPS AND CONOCO PHILLIPS COMPANY, Appellees. On appeal from th
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000-05-31 · Published · cited 0× · 98 F. Supp. 2d 981; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7728; 2000 WL 714317
98 F.Supp.2d 981 (2000) J.C. WHITNEY & CO., Plaintiff, v. RENAISSANCE SOFTWARE CORPORATION, Robert J. Saltzman, and John Jackson, Defendants. Renaissance Software Corporation, Counter-Plaintiff, v. J.C. Whitney & Co., Counter-Defendant. No. 99 C 3714. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 31, 2000.
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002-03-13 · Published · cited 4× · 564 S.E.2d 453; 255 Ga. App. 1; 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 930; 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 330
564 S.E.2d 453 (2002) 255 Ga. App. 1 UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENSCLARKE COUNTY v. WATSON. No. A01A2441. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 13, 2002. Reconsideration Denied April 12, 2002. *455 McLeod, Benton, Begnaud & Marshall, William C. Berryman, Jr., Athens, Pursley, Howell, Lowery
Zarrilli v. Weldpublic domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995-02-09 · Published · cited 2× · 875 F. Supp. 68; 25 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20945; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1720; 1995 WL 62163
*70 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND Pro se plaintiff Vincent F. Zarrilli (“Zarrilli”) filed this action in August of 1994 seeking, inter alia, to enjoin the construction of the Central Artery depression portion of the Boston Central Artery-Third Harbor Tunnel Project (the “C
Steubing v. Hooperpublic domain
New York Court of Appeals · 1947-11-13 · Published · cited 2× · 76 N.E.2d 323; 297 N.Y. 660; 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1134
Judgments affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ. *Page 662
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2006-02-16 · Published · cited 0× · 416 F. Supp. 2d 1361; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26596; 2006 WL 461032
416 F.Supp.2d 1361 (2006) In Re CELEXA AND LEXAPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION No. 1736. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. February 16, 2006. *1362 Before WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman, JOHN F. KEENAN, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr., KATHRYN H. VRATIL and DAVID R. HANSEN, Judges of the Panel.
District Court, E.D. New York · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 9× · 147 F. Supp. 3d 80; 2015 WL 7721207
ORDER SPATT, District Judge. This is a consolidated proceeding involving two actions arising from the decision by the Defendant United States Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) to build a reinforced sand dune on the beach in Montauk, New York with the stated purpose of “addressing the immediate need to reduce risk to life and property that resulted from Hurricane Sandy” (the “Project”). The Project was
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 1987-03-17 · Published · cited 21× · 727 S.W.2d 704; 1987 Tex. App. LEXIS 7199
727 S.W.2d 704 (1987) Glenn KEEVER, et al, Appellants, v. HALL & NORTHWAY ADVERTISING, INC., Appellee. No. 05-86-00484-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. March 17, 1987. Douglas H. Parks, Dallas, for appellants. William R. Wilson, Dallas, for appellee. Before DEVANY, ROWE and McCRAW, JJ. *705 DEVANY,
District Court, D. Nevada · 1980-12-15 · Published · cited 26× · 507 F. Supp. 1128; 210 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 930; 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15706
507 F.Supp. 1128 (1980) Michael R. WOOD, individually, and dba National Photo Services, Plaintiff, v. SANTA BARBARA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INC. et al., Defendants. Civ. No. LV 79-1 RDF. United States District Court, D. Nevada. December 15, 1980. *1129 *1130 *1131
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2010-03-12 · Published · cited 1× · 425 B.R. 852; 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 375; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 609; 52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 253
425 B.R. 852 (2010) In re MAXKO PETROLEUM, LLC, Debtor. Sonya L. Salkin, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Palm Beach International, Inc., and Aabhash Pradhan, Defendants. Sonya L. Salkin, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Henri Hage, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-14652-BKC-JKO. Adversary Nos. 08-01833-JKO, 08-01862-JKO. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, Fort Lauderdale Divisio
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988-08-25 · Published · cited 7× · 757 S.W.2d 856; 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 2133; 1988 WL 87336
757 S.W.2d 856 (1988) Douglas A. THIBODEAUX, Appellant, v. SPRING WOODS BANK, Appellee. SPRING WOODS BANK, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Douglas A. THIBODEAUX and Douglas A. Thibodeaux, M.D., P.A., Appellees and Cross-Appellants. Nos. B14-86-00656-CV, B14-87-00127-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). August 25, 1988.