Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Williams v. Sheahan”
Williams v. Sheahanpublic domain
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
People ex rel. Williams v. Sheahanpublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Seneca County (Dennis F. Bender, A.J.), entered April 21, 2015 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that the evidence is legally insufficient to support h
People ex rel. Williams v. Sheahanpublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Seneca County (Dennis F. Bender, A.J.), entered April 21, 2015 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that the evidence is legally insufficient to support h
Williams v. Sheahanpublic domain
ORDER Illinois prisoner Nathaniel Williams, Jr., who is serving life without parole for committing armed robbery as a “habitual criminal,” see 720 ILCS 5/33B-1, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 alleging that the overall delay in processing his direct appeal-which resulted from delays in filing the notice of appeal and preparing the record and brief-deprived him of due process. The district court dismissed the petition
WILLIAMS, DEANDRE v. SHEAHAN, MICHAELpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1101 KAH 15-00927 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. DEANDRE WILLIAMS, ALSO KNOWN AS DAVID WILLIAMS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MICHAEL SHEAHAN, SUPERINTENDENT, FIVE POINTS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. CHARLES J. GREENBERG
Houskins v. Sheahanpublic domain
549 F.3d 480 (2008) Virgean HOUSKINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael F. SHEAHAN, Sheriff, The Sheriff of Cook County, sued in his official capacity, Cook County and Donald Keith, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 06-2283, 06-2549, 06-2575. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 9, 2007. Decided November 25, 2008.
Dargis v. Sheahanpublic domain
526 F.3d 981 (2008) Liutauras DARGIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael F. SHEAHAN, Sheriff of Cook County, a/k/a and d/b/a Cook County Sheriff's Office of Corrections, Marcus Lyles, Sheriff's Assistant Executive Director of the Cook County Sheriff's Office of Corrections, Ernesto Velasco, Executive Director of the Cook County Sheriff's Office of Corrections, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 05-2575. Un
Walker v. Sheahanpublic domain
526 F.3d 973 (2008) Fredrick Lee WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael F. SHEAHAN, Sheriff, William Kampic, Vincent E. Garrett, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-2817. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued March 31, 2008. Decided May 14, 2008. *975 W. Allen Woolley, Wildman, Harrold, Allen
Howard v. Sheahanpublic domain
(2008) Donna HOWARD, Plaintiff v. Michael SHEAHAN, in his official capacity as Cook County Sheriff, Timothy Doody, Lieutenant Grochowski, and Superintendent Snooks, Defendants. No. 05 C 1577. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 4, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM J. HIBBLER, District Judge. Do
Read v. Sheahanpublic domain
833 N.E.2d 887 (2005) 359 Ill. App.3d 89 295 Ill.Dec. 681 Eddie READ, Plaintiff, v. Michael F. SHEAHAN, Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois, Harold E. Bailey, Chairman of the Cook County Board of Corrections, Howard D. Brookins, Sr., Vice Chairman of the Cook County Board of Corrections, Frederick B. Sengstacke, Esequiel Iracheta and Gilbert Marchman, Members of the Cook County Board of Corrections, De
Ely v. Sheahanpublic domain
PRESIDING JUSTICE GARCIA delivered the opinion of the court: In response to an extradition request from the Governor of Michigan, Governor’s warrants were issued and relators, Robert Ely and Michael Miller, were arrested in Cook County, Illinois, as fugitives from justice. The Governor’s warrant for Ely indica
Cady, Davy v. Sheahan, Michaelpublic domain
*1059 KANNE, Circuit Judge. At issue in this case are claims brought by Davy Cady pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Cook County, Illinois, Sheriff Michael Sheahan and four other sheriffs officers, Gonzolo Lucio, William Bar-bat, William Jacoby, and William Margalus (collectively “officers”), allegin
Sheahan v. Mastonpublic domain
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Peter E. Corning, A.J.), entered July 2, 2004. The order denied plaintiffs motion for leave to reargue an order entered April 7, 2004. It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984 [1990]). Present — Scudder, J.P., Martoche, Pine, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
Schmude v. Sheahanpublic domain
312 F.Supp.2d 1047 (2004) Joan SCHMUDE, Administrator of the Estate of Louis Schmude Plaintiff, v. Michael SHEAHAN, in his official capacity as Cook County Sheriff, William Spatz, Patricia Pultz, and Lawrence Koscianski Defendants. No. 00 C 4580. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 29, 2004. *1048
Mayoral v. Sheahanpublic domain
245 F.3d 934 (7th Cir. 2001) JOEL MAYORAL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,v.MICHAEL F. SHEAHAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF COOK COUNTY, AND SHARON JACKSON, WILLIAM JANAK, AND DANIEL THEISEN, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A CORRECTION OFFICER AT THE COOK COUNTY JAIL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. No. 00-1034 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT<
Schmude v. Sheahanpublic domain
420 F.3d 645 Joan SCHMUDE, Administrator of the estate of Louis Schmude, Plaintiff,v.Michael F. SHEAHAN, Sheriff of Cook County, William Spatz, Patricia Pultz, et al., Defendants.Appeals Of: Edward R. Theobald, Anthony Pinelli, and Alan R. Brunell, Appellants. No. 04-2306. No. 04-2322. No. 04-2343. United States Court of Appeals, Seven
Schmude v. Sheahanpublic domain
198 F.Supp.2d 964 (2002) Joan SCHMUDE, individually and as administrator of the Estate of Louis Schmude, Plaintiff, v. Michael SHEAHAN, Cook County Sheriff, William Spatz, Patricia Pultz, and Larry Koscianski, Defendants. No. 00 C 4580. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 22, 2002. *965 Patrick Jo
Schmude v. Sheahanpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER NORGLE, District Judge. Before the court is Defendants’, William Spatz, Patricia Pultz and Larry Koscianski’s, Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Rules 4(m), 12(b)(4), and 12(b)(5). For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of the death of Louis Schmude. Schmude died o
Schmude v. Sheahanpublic domain
318 F.Supp.2d 606 (2004) Joan SCHMUDE, Administrator of the Estate of Louis Schmude, Plaintiff, v. Michael SHEAHAN, in his official capacity as Cook County Sheriff, William Spatz, Patricia Pultz, and Lawrence Koscianski, Defendants. No. 00 C 4580. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 4, 2004. Opinion Denying Motion to Vacate or Ame
Sweet v. Sheahanpublic domain
Introduction KATZMANN, Circuit Judge: Defendant Robert Sheahan (“Sheahan” or “defendant”) appeals a decision of the District Court for the Northern District of New York (David N. Hurd, J.), which denied his motion to dismiss plaintiffs claim. Plaintiff Nancy Sweet, individually and on behalf of her son Thomas Brown (“plaintiff’ or “Sweet”), brought suit against defendant on the grounds