Cases

Colbert, J. ¶ 1 The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the thrice incarnated affidavit of merit requirement found in Okla. Stat. tit. 12, 19.1 (SuppV 2013), is unconstitutional. In the wake of Zeier v. Zimmer, 2006 OK 98, 152 P.3d 861, its sequel Wall v. Marouk, 2013 OK 36, 302 P.3d 775, and upon reexamination of the Oklahoma Constitution, the inevita

04/24/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 13, 2024 Session EUGENE MOXLEY v. AMISUB SFH, INC. D/B/A SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-4603-20 Cedrick D. Wooten, Judge ___

OSCN Found Document:JOHN v. SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets

ORDER SARA DARROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff OSF Healthcare System (“OSF”), doing business as Saint Francis Medical Center, is suing Insperity Group Health Plan (“Insperity”) and United-HealthCare Insurance Company (“United”) over nonpayment of a medical bill. OSF sues for recovery of benefits under a provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1

278 F.Supp.2d 423 (2003) HEALTHAMERICA PENNSYLVANIA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs v. SUSQUEHANNA HEALTH SYSTEM, et al., Defendants No. CIV.A.3:CV-00-1525. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. July 21, 2003. *424 *425 David E. Lehman, McNees, Wallace & Nurick, Harrisburg, PA, Lee Ca

397 F.Supp.2d 1032 (2005) SISTERS OF ST. FRANCIS HEALTH SERVICES, INC., d/b/a St. Francis Hospital Mooresville, Plaintiff, v. MORGAN COUNTY, INDIANA, et al., Defendants. No. 1:05 CV 0623 DFH TAB. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. November 2, 2005. *1033 *1034 <

886 F.Supp. 1551 (1995) Mary Ann PERRY, Ron Perry, Don Perry, Linda Huntsman, Beverly Blassingame, and Vickie Puff, Plaintiffs, v. SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and American National Red Cross, Defendants. No. 93-4231-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 26, 1995. *1552

822 F.Supp.2d 809 (2011) OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, an Illinois not for profit corporation d/b/a Saint Francis Medical Center, Plaintiff, v. CONCERT HEALTH PLAN INSURANCE CO., Ronald Miller, and Robin Miller, Defendants. No. 08-CV-1328. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Peoria Division. October 4, 2011. *812 Douglas N. Kot

94 F.Supp.2d 399 (2000) State of NEW YORK by Eliot SPITZER, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, Vassar Brothers Hospital and Mid-Hudson Health, Defendants. No. 98 Civ. 0939(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 10, 2000. *400 *401

254 F.Supp.2d 80 (2003) BAYSTATE HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a Baystate Medical Center, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Tommy THOMPSON, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 02-060KPLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 25, 2003. Christopher L. Keough, Powers, Pyles, Sutter & Verville, P.C., Washingt

94 F.Supp.2d 423 (2000) State of NEW YORK By Eliot SPITZER, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, Vassar Brothers Hospital and Mid-Hudson Health, Defendants. No. 98 Civ. 0939(WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 10, 2000. *424 Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of State of New York, New York Cit

731 A.2d 206 (1999) Carol Ann LYONS, M.D. v. SAINT VINCENT HEALTH CENTER, Appellant. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 11, 1999. Decided April 22, 1999. Reargument Denied July 1, 1999. David R. Johnson, Pittsburgh, for appellant. James D. McDonald, Jr., Erie, for appellee. Before PELLEGRINI, J., FLAHERTY, J., and RODG

OPINION BY ALLEN, J.: St. Luke’s Hospital of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania d/b/a St. Luke’s Hospital and St. Luke’s Hospital & Health Network, (“Appellant”), appeals from the trial court’s order overruling Appellant’s claims of privilege, denying a protective order in favor of Appellant, and sanctioning Appellant pursuant to a motion by John R. Vivian, Jr. Esquire (“Attorney”) 1. We a

OPINION AND ORDER RAMOS, District Judge. Summit Health, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Summit”) brought this breach of contract action against APS Healthcare Bethesda, Inc. (“Defendant” or “APS”), alleging that APS failed to pay the full amount due under their service contract. Doc. 1. Sum*384mit alleges that APS has wrongfully withheld payment o

937 F.Supp. 496 (1995) SAINT VINCENT HEALTH CENTER, Plaintiff, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services; Bruce Vladeck, Administrator, Health Care Financing Administration; and Richard C. Rinschler, Director, Provider Audit, Blue Cross of Western Pennsylvania, Defendants. Civil Action No. 92-373 Erie. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

595 P.2d 780 (1979) John SUTHERLAND, Appellant, v. SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC., Appellee. No. 51273. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. February 6, 1979. Rehearing Denied June 18, 1979. Bob Funston, Daniel J. Boudreau, Broken Arrow, for appellant. Thomas R. Brett, Roy C. Breedlove, Jones, Givens, Brett, Gotcher, Doyle & Bogan, Inc., Tulsa, for a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHANTAL RUFF, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24-2562 (JDB) ASCENSION HEALTH SERVICES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Chantal Ruff was employed by Ascension Health Services and Providence Health Systems for several years. He

155 P.3d 9 (2006) 2006 OK 83 Lowonna JONES, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Christopher Williams Jr., her deceased adult son, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MERCY HEALTH CENTER, INC.; Phoenix Physicians Services, Inc.; Jeffery Johns, ARNP; Conrad Caldwell, M.D.; and Timothy Hill, M.D., Defendants/Appellees, and James C. Robbins, RN, Defendant. No. 102,192.

194 P.3d 1181 (2008) William KAY, Jr., Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Jeffrey Kay, Petitioner-Appellant, v. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC., Respondent-Appellee. No. 27581. Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai`i. October 31, 2008. *1183 Richard Turbin, Rai Saint Chu, Sidney D. Smith, Jr. (Law Off

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Virginia Community College System, Northern Virginia Community College’s (“NVCC”) Motion for Summary Judgment. [Dkt. 24.] For the following reasons, the Court will grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. I. Background This case arises out of a national ori