Cases

667 N.E.2d 167 (1996) 281 Ill. App.3d 545 217 Ill.Dec. 374 Eva PODOBA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PYRAMID ELECTRIC, INC., a foreign corporation, and Gary LeRuez, Defendants-Appellees. No. 5-95-0263. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. June 25, 1996. Rehearing Denied July 18, 1996.

511 F.Supp. 1034 (1981) William A. WEILAND v. PYRAMID VENTURES GROUP et al. Civ. A. No. 76-5-A. United States District Court, M. D. Louisiana. January 28, 1981. On Motions To Amend April 2, 1981. *1035 *1036 *1037 Charles R. Moore, Moore &a;

Kane, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tompkins County (Rowley, J.), rendered October 30, 2001, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. At approximately 3:30 p.m. on June 1, 2001, Investigator *805

417 F.Supp. 498 (1975) Nancy KREITZER, Plaintiff, v. PUERTO RICO CARS, INC. et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 786-73. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 3, 1975. *499 *500 *501 Harvey B. Nachman, Nachman, Feldstein & Gelpi, San Juan, P. R., f

Singley, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Levine and Eldridge, JJ., dissent in part and Eldridge, J., filed an opinion dissenting in part, in which Levine, J., concurs, at page 509 infra. Digges, J., following reargument, concurs in part and dissents in part and filed an opinion at page 511 infra. This wrongful death action has generated th

Argued April 21, 1943. Minor plaintiff, John E. Williams, Jr., nine years old, was injured as a result of a fall through a skylight constructed upon a roof of defendant's factory premises at the southeast corner of Otterman and Washington Streets, in Greensburg. The plant was built upon land bounded on the north by Otterman Street, on the west by Washington Street, on the east by a cement alley, on the south partly by lands of other owners from which it was divided by a fence, and on the sout

109 F.2d 500 (1940) WILLIAMS IRON WORKS CO. v. HUGHES TOOL CO. No. 1892. Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. January 13, 1940. *501 Arthur C. Brown, of Kansas City, Mo. (Herbert K. Hyde, of Oklahoma City, Okl., on the briefs), for appellant. George I. Haight, of Chicago, Ill. (Jesse R. Stone, of Houston, Tex., and Boh

622 F.2d 1147 HOWE, Donald D., Appellant,v.ALLIED VAN LINES, INC.HILL, Jerry P., Appellant,v.TRANS-AMERICAN VAN SERVICE, INC.FARIS, James R.v.AERO MAYFLOWER TRANSIT CO., INC.v.UNITED STATES of America, 3rd Party Defendant,United Services Automobile Association, Appellant.BILLITER, James H.United Services Automobile Associationv.WHEATON VAN LINES, INC.United Services Automobile Associat

734 F.2d 1486 236 U.S.App.D.C. 203, 59 P.U.R.4th 1 FARMERS UNION CENTRAL EXCHANGE, INC., et al., Petitioners,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, and United States ofAmerica, Respondents,Williams Pipe Line Company, Association of Oil Pipelines,Getty Pipeline, Inc., Marathon Pipe Line Company, PhillipsPipe Line Company, Sun Pipe Line Company, Mid-AmericaPipeline Company, Texas Eastern Trans

*1366 Egan Jr., J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Muller, J.), entered January 19, 2016 in Clinton County, upon a decision of the court partially in favor of plaintiff. In September 2008, defendant William P. Ferris Jr. (hereinafter Ferris) and defendant Kristen M. F

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEPHAN NAMISNAK; FRANCIS No. 18-15860 FALLS, Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-06124- v. RS UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; RASIER, LLC, OPINION Defendants-Appellants.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEPHAN NAMISNAK; FRANCIS No. 18-15860 FALLS, Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-06124- v. RS UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; RASIER, LLC, OPINION Defendants-Appellants.

Filed 9/21/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE SAMANTHA LIAPES et al., A164880 Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. (San Mateo County Super. Ct. FACEBOOK, INC., No. 20CIV01712) Defendant and Respondent. Samantha

20-3520-cr (L) United States v. Raniere In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2021 No. 20-3520-cr (L); 20-3789-cr (Con) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. KEITH RANIERE, also known as Vanguard, and CLA

KING, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Shortly after the adoption of its current comprehensive zoning ordinance and map in 2014, the City of Ridgeland ("the City"), on June 2, 2015, adopted an amendment to the zoning ordinance, creating as a permitted use in general commercial ("C-2") districts a Large Master Planned Commercial Development ("LMPCD"). The amendment allowed uses previously pr

Stanley Charles Butler, Jr. v. State of Maryland. Case Number 1037, Sept. Term 2021 Opinion by Wells, C.J. CRIMINAL LAW – FIFTH AMENDMENT – SUPPRESSION – DEFENDANT’S BURDEN Even though a private citizen may be deemed an “agent of the State” for the purposes of evaluating an alleged violation of the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self- incrimination, a defendant bears the burden of proving that such a citizen was, in fact, acting as an agent of law enforcement when that person questioned

Stanley Charles Butler, Jr. v. State of Maryland. Case Number 1037, Sept. Term 2021 Opinion by Wells, C.J. CRIMINAL LAW – FIFTH AMENDMENT – SUPPRESSION – DEFENDANT’S BURDEN Even though a private citizen may be deemed an “agent of the State” for the purposes of evaluating an alleged violation of the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self- incrimination, a defendant bears the burden of proving that such a citizen was, in fact, acting as an agent of law enforcement when that person questioned

Stanley Charles Butler, Jr. v. State of Maryland. Case Number 1037, Sept. Term 2021 Opinion by Wells, C.J. CRIMINAL LAW – FIFTH AMENDMENT – SUPPRESSION – DEFENDANT’S BURDEN Even though a private citizen may be deemed an “agent of the State” for the purposes of evaluating an alleged violation of the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self- incrimination, a defendant bears the burden of proving that such a citizen was, in fact, acting as an agent of law enforcement when that person questioned

Christopher Andrew Linz v. Montgomery County, Maryland, No. 1289, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Eyler, Deborah S., J. RULES 2-341(c), AMENDMENTS TO PLEADINGS, 2-201, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST, 2-211(a), COMPULSORY JOINDER - - RELATION BACK DOCTRINE - - ACTION AGAINST GOVERNMENT ENTITY FOR NEGLIGENCE IN USE OF GOVERNMENT OWNED OR LEASED VEHICLE, COURTS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS ARTICLE § 5-524 AND TRANSPORTATION ARTICLE § 17-107(c) - - ACTIONS FOR NEGLIGENCE UNDER LOCAL GOVERNMENT TORT CLAIMS ACT

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D15-4430 _____________________________ NICHOLAS RIVET, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Tatiana Salvador, Judge. July 25, 2018 PER CURIAM. Eddie Robb had just turne