⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

3 opinions for “Williams v. Nedbal”

Ray v. Schwochertpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2011-04-22 · Published · cited 0× · 788 F. Supp. 2d 830; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43994; 2011 WL 1532539
788 F.Supp.2d 830 (2011) Elliot Don RAY, Petitioner, v. Jim SCHWOCHERT, Respondent.[1] Case No. 07-C-190. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. April 22, 2011. *831 Jeetander T. Dulani, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Katherine Desmond Lloyd, Wisconsin Department of Justice Offi
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012-11-19 · Published · cited 174× · 700 F.3d 993; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 23725; 2012 WL 5835251
MANION, Circuit Judge, concurring in part, dissenting in part. I. Ray filed this habeas action in federal court on February 28, 2007. Opinion at 996-97. The district court denied Ray’s petition and he appealed to this court. This court held that Ray’s clearly established confrontation clause rights were violated when the state court admitted co-actors’ st
Iheme v. Simmonspublic domain
Civil Court of the City of New York · 1990-07-23 · Published · cited 2× · 148 Misc. 2d 223; 560 N.Y.S.2d 167; 1990 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 455
OPINION OF THE COURT Alexander Graves, J. I hereby find and decide that during the course of this trial, plaintiffs attorney proposed to read from the examination before trial of William Stotts. Since counsel was unable to establish that diligent efforts had been made to produce the attendance of Mr. Stotts at the trial, paragraph (3) of CPLR 3117 (a), allowing the use of the deposition of any person by any p