⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Williams v. Moran Foods, LLC d/b/a Save-A-Lot”

District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2019-05-24 · Published · cited 1× · 388 F. Supp. 3d 954
CURTIS L. COLLIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is a motion to dismiss by Defendants Moran Foods, LLC and Save-a-lot, LTD. (Doc. 20.) On March 26, 2019, the Court granted a motion by Defendants Newcorp, LLC, and Save-a-lot Knoxville, LLC to join in the motion to dismiss. (Doc. 27.) Plaintiff Larry McCloud has responded in opposition to the motion to dismiss (Doc. 30), and Defendants Moran Foods, LLC, Save-a-lot, LTD
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015-02-11 · Published · cited 2× · 269 Or. App. 112; 343 P.3d 693; 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 1582
LAGESEN, J. While driving as part of his job as a district manager for defendant Moran Foods on the night of November 1, 2009, defendant Tito Feliciano struck plaintiffs daughter, Lindsay Leonard, with his car as she was crossing Foster Road in Portland in a marked but faded crosswalk under a streetlight that was not working. The collision killed Leonard. Plaintiff, Leonard’s father, filed this wrongful death negligence action
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026-05-14 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 Ohio 1781
[Cite as Moran Foods, L.L.C. v. Sunshine Stores, L.L.C., 2026-Ohio-1781.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Moran Foods, LLC, : Plaintiff-Appellee : No. 25AP-617 v. : (C.P.C. No. 25CV-3586) S
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-04-08 · Published · cited 217× · 31 F.4th 651
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OLEAN WHOLESALE GROCERY No. 19-56514 COOPERATIVE, INC., BEVERLY YOUNGBLOOD, PACIFIC D.C. No. GROSERVICE, INC., DBA Pitco 3:15-md-02670- Foods, CAPITOL HILL DMS-MDD SUPERMARKET, LOUISE ANN DAVIS MATTHEWS, JAMES WALNUM, COLIN MOORE, JENNIFER A. NELSON, OPINION ELIZABETH DAVIS-BERG, LAURA CHILDS; NANCY STILLER; BONNIE VANDERLAAN; KRISTIN MILLICAN; T
District Court, C.D. California · 2015-02-23 · Published · cited 76× · 90 F. Supp. 3d 919; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24971; 2015 WL 1062756
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On June 28, 2011, Robert Briseno filed a complaint against ConAgra;1 between Oc*938tober and December 2011, the court consolidated several cases filed against ConA-gra under the caption above
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018-11-07 · Published · cited 4× · 259 So. 3d 547
WICKER, J. In this slip and fall case, plaintiff-patron appeals the judgment in favor of merchant-defendant rendered following a bench trial. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment. Factual and Procedural Background On September 14, 2016, plaintiff, Adrian Williams, filed suit in the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Jefferson ag
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2021-02-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES Consolidated STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION C.A. No. 2020-0707-KSJM MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: February 5, 2021 Date Decided: February 26, 2021 Gregory V. Varallo, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael J. Barry, Christine M. Mackintosh, Kelly L. Tucker, GR
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017-04-25 · Published · cited 26× · 250 F. Supp. 3d 856; 2017 WL 1487439; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62790
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on
North Carolina Business Court · 2017-08-18 · Published · cited 1× · 2017 NCBC 71
New Friendship Used Clothing Collection, LLC v. Katz, 2017 NCBC 71. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION WAKE COUNTY 16 CVS 14819 NEW FRIENDSHIP USED CLOTHING COLLECTION, LLC; AD&D PARTNERS, LLC; DANIEL P. GREEN; ALEX HUSTED; and DAVID J.R. MILLINER, Plaintiffs, ORDER
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2015-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013-06-10 · Published · cited 1× · 291 F.R.D. 224; 85 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 953; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80923; 2013 WL 2477184
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARY M. ROWLAND, United States Magistrate Judge. Nonparty Nisen & Elliott, LLC moves the Court to bar Defendants’ use or disclosure of two memoranda in these proceedings, which it contends are protected by the work-product privilege, find that the memoranda remain privileged, and award sanctions. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is granted in part and den
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007-06-12 · Published · cited 1× · 500 F. Supp. 2d 962; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43096; 2007 WL 1732515
500 F.Supp.2d 962 (2007) Debra BYRD-TOLSON, Plaintiff, v. SUPERVALU, INC., a Delaware Corporation, d/b/a Say-A-Lot Grocers and Say-A-Lot Grocers of 7908 Halstead, Chicago, Illinois, and Moran Foods Inc., a Missouri Corporation, Defendants. No. 06 C 3818. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 12, 2007. *963<
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015-08-18 · Published · cited 0× · 124 F. Supp. 3d 658; 2015 A.M.C. 2339; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108921; 2015 WL 4929031
ORDER JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on the following motions: Claimant Tammy *661Strickland’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE-65]; Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Claimant Bonnie Cockrell’s Claim for Punitive Damages [DE-69]; Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Claimants’ Punitive Damag
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004-03-02 · Published · cited 9× · 128 S.W.3d 630; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 271; 2004 WL 376903
128 S.W.3d 630 (2004) JOHN R. BOYCE FAMILY TRUST, John R. Boyce, Mary Ann Boyce, Daniel P. Boyce, M. Elizabeth Boyce, Emily Ann Boyce and Stephen Pallen Boyce, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Robert B. SNYDER, Defendant/Appellant. No. ED 82749. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. March 2, 2004. *633 James R. D
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015-09-17 · Published · cited 4× · 130 F. Supp. 3d 1122; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123956; 2015 WL 5472286
*1128 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF MIDFIELD’S PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 46), GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS AREAS USA AND AREAS MCNAMARA’S PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 38), AND GRANTING COUNTERr-DEFENDANT SAMIR MASHNI’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 40) MARIANNE O. BATTANI, Un