Cases

Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr., United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Midland Funding, LLC's ("Midland") Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 69] and Plaintiff Quentin Thompson's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 71].1 Thompson claims that Midland violated two provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692f(1) and 1692e(5), by s

Facts On September 4, 2014, Plaintiff opened a Credit One credit card account (the "Account"). The Vice President of Credit One and an authorized representative of MHC Receivables, LLC ("MHC"), and FNBM, LLC ("FNBM"), Vicky Scott, states that *16after an account holder opens an account, Credit One mails their credit card, enclose

WOLF, District Judge I. SUMMARY Plaintiffs Johnson Khath and Virginia Newton in these consolidated cases are Massachusetts residents with credit card debt who each initiated a putative class action suit against defendant Midland Funding, LLC ("Midland"), a debt collection company. Plaintiffs claim that Midland has harmed Massachusetts residents by wrongfully operating in the state without a debt collector license.<

Justice BREYER delivered the opinion of the Court. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 91 Stat. 874, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., prohibits a debt collector from asserting any “false, deceptive, or misleading representation,” or using any “unfair or unconscionable means” to collect, or attempt to collect, a debt, §§ 1692e, 1692f. In th

HONORABLE RICHARD D. TAYLOR, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE The debtors, Freddy and Amber May, filed a Class Action Complaint ("Complaint") on May 4, 2018. The defendants, Midland Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc. ("Midland"), filed Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Strike Class Allegations and Memorandum in Support ("Motion") on June 25, 2018, which drew Plaintiffs' Memorandum in

MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, District Judge. Catarina Gomes, Diane Hurlebaus, Lori Libertó and Robert Wallis (collectively, “the plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated, bring suit against defendant Midland Funding, LLC (“Midland”) for allegedly engaging in unfair and deceptive debt collection practices in Massachusetts in violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge: 1 Daniel Sotolongo appeals from the district court's ruling granting summary judgment in favor of Midland Funding LLC (Midland) and its attorneys on a breach of contract claim brought by Midland and multiple consumer-law claims brought by Sotolon-go. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand to the district court. BACKGROUND 12 This case arises from Midland's attem

20 So.3d 554 (2009) MIDLAND FUNDING LLC v. Cynthia BURTHLONG. No. 2009-CA-0487. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. September 16, 2009. Rehearing Denied November 4, 2009. *555 James Ryan, III, Timothy T. Roniger, Jeffrey A. Clayman, James Ryan III & Associates, LLC, New Orleans, LA, for Appellee, Mi

Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge Kaldoon Haddad sued Midland Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, *737Inc. (together, “Midland”) for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq. Doc. 15. Midland answered the complaint, Doc. 22, and now moves to dismiss

ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. 17). The parties have filed briefs in support of their respective positions, (Docs.17, 21, 22, 25, 27), and the motion is ripe for resolution. After careful consideration, the Court concludes the motion is due to be granted. BACKGROUND According to the co

STARK, J. ¶ 1. Jeff Mizinski appeals orders denying his motion to quash an earnings garnishment and his motion for reconsideration. Mizinski argues the circuit court lacked in rem jurisdiction to garnish his wages because the wages were not located in the state of Wisconsin. However, we conclude in rem jurisdiction over the wages was not required. Pursuant to Dalton v. *477

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

[Cite as Midland Funding, L.L.C. v. Schwarzmer, 2022-Ohio-4506.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 111357 v. : MENDY SCHWARZMER,

ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. (Doc. 12). The parties have filed briefs in support of their respective positions, (Docs. 13, 17, 18, 22), and the motion is ripe for resolution. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the motion is due to be denied. BACKGROUND

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this

[Cite as Midland Funding, L.L.C. v. Colvin, 2022-Ohio-572.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 5-21-04 v. CASSANDRA COLVIN, ET AL., OPINION DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. Appeal from Hancock County Common Pleas Court

[Cite as Gilbert v. Midland Funding, L.L.C., 2019-Ohio-5295.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY CAITLIN GILBERT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 5-19-11 v. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC ET AL., OPINION DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Appeal from Hanco

*267OPINION OF THE COURT Fred J. Hirsh, J. Plaintiff Midland Funding LLC (Midland) moves for an order of preclusion precluding defendant from offering evidence if defendant Joya Valentin does not respond to a notice to admit. Background Midland sues as assignee of Citibank to recover the amount alleged to be due o

505 F.3d 769 (2007) Tammy A. EVORY, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RJM ACQUISITIONS FUNDING L.L.C., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Kelly Lauer and Karla Lauer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mason, Silver, Wenk & Mishkin, LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Kevin I. Captain, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARS National Services, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Philip Jacks

Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County Case No. 02-C-14187207 Hon. William C. Mulford II REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2280 September Term, 2015 __________