⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Williams v. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.”

District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014-01-21 · Published · cited 1× · 992 F. Supp. 2d 680; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7150; 2014 WL 218441
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID BRAMLETTE, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the defendants Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., and Jacobs Project Management Co.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry 57). The Court has carefully considered the motion and response, as well as the memoranda of the parties, all supporting documents, and the applicable law. The Court held a hea
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015-06-02 · Published · cited 60× · 790 F.3d 641; 2015 FED App. 0108P; 45 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20109; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9128; 2015 WL 3463032
OPINION . RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. This case arises out of the cleanup and remediation work that Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (Jacobs) performed at the Kingston Fossil Fuel Plant (KIF plant) following a December 2008 coal-ash spill. Jacobs managed the on-site work pursuant to a contract with the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), which owns and
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022-06-13 · Published · cited 8× · 36 F.4th 686
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0123p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ GREG ADKISSON et al., │ Plaintiffs-Appell
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016-09-08 · Published · cited 8× · 502 S.W.3d 460; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 10025; 2016 WL 4705616
OPINION Ken Wise, Justice In this interlocutory appeal, two engineering companies challenge the trial court’s denial of their motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ wrongful death claims’ for failure to file a certificate of merit as required by section 150.002 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code. The companies contend that the trial court abused its discretion because the plaintiffs’ claims that the
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2018-06-19 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued June 19, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00551-CV ——————————— JACOBS FIELD SERVICES NORTH AMERICA, INC., JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., AND JACOBS ENGINEERING, INC., Appellant
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018-09-14 · Published · cited 477× · 301 Neb. 38; 917 N.W.2d 435
Funke, J. **42 *444 This case arises out of an explosion at a ConAgra Foods, Inc. (ConAgra), plant in Garner, North Carolina, which killed 3 ConAgra employees and injured more than 60 others. When d
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003-02-14 · Published · cited 0× · 844 So. 2d 72; 2002 La.App. 1 Cir. 0507; 2003 La. App. LEXIS 319; 2003 WL 346486
2McClendon, J. This appeal arises from an action for workers’ compensation that was denied. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In March of 1997, Donald Gonzales, a mechanic’s helper, was working at the Pioneer Chemical plant in St. Gabriel, Louisiana, for J.E. Merit Constructors, a subsidiary of Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (hereinafter “employer”).
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022-05-18 · Published · cited 6× · 35 F.4th 421
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0107p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ GREG ADKISSON et al., │ Plaintiffs-Appell
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018-09-14 · Published · cited 24× · 301 Neb. 38
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 11/23/2018 12:12 AM CST - 38 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 301 Nebraska R eports JACOBS ENGR. GROUP v. CONAGRA FOODS Cite as 301 Neb. 38 Jacobs Engine
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004-06-09 · Published · cited 0× · 875 So. 2d 131; 2004 WL 1344871
_[2_LEON A. CANNIZZARO, JR., Judge. The defendants in this case have filed applications for supervisory writs in connection with the trial court’s denial of their exceptions of improper venue. We hereby grant the defendants’ writ applications. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Two groups of defendants in this case each filed an application for supervisory writs seeking review of the trial court
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-09-15 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JENNIFER JACOBS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-2242 (RMC) ) THE EX
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RUBY WAGNER, on behalf of herself ) and all other similarly situated ) stockholders of BRP GROUP, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0150-JTL ) BRP GROUP, INC., )
California Court of Appeal · 2021-09-02 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 9/2/21; Opinion following rehearing CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE BETH HARRIS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A153106 v. THOMAS DEE ENGINEERING (Alameda County CO., INC.,
California Court of Appeal · 2021-08-04 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 8/4/21 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE BETH HARRIS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A153106 v. THOMAS DEE ENGINEERING (Alameda County CO., INC., Super. Ct. No. RG14725868) Def
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017-05-18 · Published · cited 5× · 2017 IL App (1st) 151107
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2017-03-31 · Published · cited 16× · 131 Fed. Cl. 430; 2017 WL 1291795
Bid-protests; challenges to corrective action; jurisdiction; standing; ripeness; mootness; validity of the agency’s decision to take corrective action; inadequacy of showing to support discovery into alleged bias OPINION AND ORDER 1 LETTOW, Judge. These bid protests address
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994-05-16 · Published · cited 1× · 25 F.3d 1053; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21216; 1994 WL 196749
25 F.3d 1053NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit. Scott A. LAWLER, Plaintiff/Appellant,v.JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP OF OHIO, INC.,*Defendant/Appellee. No. 93-3194.
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-05-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE COLUMBIA PIPELINE GROUP, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED MERGER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2018-0484-JTL OPINION RESOLVING POST-TRIAL ISSUES Date Submitted: January 19, 2024 Date Decided: May 15, 2024 Ned Weinberger, Brendan W. Sullivan, LABATON KELLER SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Gregory V. Varallo, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LL
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023-04-24 · Published · cited 5× · 2023 IL App (2d) 220019
2023 IL App (2d) 220019 No. 2-22-0019 Opinion filed April 24, 2023 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ THE HIGHVIEW GROUP, LTD
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2021-04-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SNOW PHIPPS GROUP, LLC, and ) DECOPAC HOLDINGS INC., ) ) Plaintiffs-Counterclaim ) Defendants, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0282-KSJM ) KCAKE ACQUISITION, INC.,