Cases

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 266.

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE VENTERS Appellants in this eminent domain action1 all own a fee simple undivided fractional interest in a tract of land taken by the Commonwealth of Kentucky for a highway construction project. They appealed the jury verdict establishing the "just compensation"2 paid for property to be taken. However, upon motion of the Commonwealth, the Court

Nathaniel M. Gorton, United States District Judge This civil action arises out of an alleged domestic assault and battery by Matthew Fairbanks ("Fairbanks" or "plaintiff") on his estranged father during a social gathering at plaintiff's apartment in Danvers, Massachusetts. The local police department was notified and Officers Dana O'Hagan ("Officer O'Hagan"), James George ("Officer George"), and William Cassidy ("Officer Cassidy"),

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER COLLEEN KOLLÁR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge These consolidated. cases emerge', from alleged medical malpractice by agents of the United States with respect to Plaintiff L.C.H., a minor, which allegedly resulted in a severe brain injury. Plaintiffs Hagan and Wilson, the parents of L.C.H., seek damages under the Federal T

Boggs, Judge. Jules Hagan appeals following a jury verdict in favor of Christopher Keyes on Keyes’ complaint seeking damages for fraud, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. Hagan asserts that the trial court erred in awarding Keyes damages on the breach of contract claim, denying his motion for a directed verdict on the fraud claim, and awarding Keyes attorney fees. Hagan al

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge These consolidated cases emerge from alleged medical malpractice by agents of *32 the United States with respect to Plaintiff L.C.H., a minor, that are connected to events in the earliest years of

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. The central question before this Court is whether it is clear and manifest that Congress, through the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act of 1995, intended to remove prisoners from the definition of “Persons” permitted to join claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20. We answer this question in the negative. Appellants are fourteen state i

MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge: The UPS Store, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc., and United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (collectively, “UPS”) bring this action for breach of contract and trademark infringement against Robert Hagan, Thomas Hagan, and the entities they operated (collectively, “the Hagans”). The lawsuit stems from UPS’s termination of the Hagans’ fr

ROTHENBERG, J. INTRODUCTION This is a foreclosure case. The lender, IndyMac Federal Bank FSB (“the Bank”), foreclosed on and subsequently purchased Kevin J. Hagan and Monica P. Hagan’s (collectively, “the Hagans”) property at a foreclosure sale. After the clerk issued a certifícate of sale, the Hagans filed a motion which they characterize as both an objection to the foreclosure sale and motion

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: This case arises from a January 20, 2006 incident in which an underground cable owned by plaintiff-appellant MCI was allegedly severed. MCI filed suit against defendants-appellees Wayne Hagan and James Joubert, alleging that Joubert was negligently excavating on a backhoe in violation of the Louisiana Damage Prevention Act (Louisiana Underground Utilities

15 So.3d 863 (2009) TECO BARGE LINE, INC., and U.S. United Barge Line, LLC, successor in interest to TECO Barge Line, Inc., Appellants, v. Jarrod M. HAGAN, Appellee. No. 2D08-4743. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. July 31, 2009. *864 David W. McCreadie, Eddie G. Godwin and Douglas R. Williams of Lau, Lane, Pi

322 F.Supp.2d 1280 (2004) Gloria BARR, Plaintiff, v. Linda M. HAGAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:04cv356-T. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. May 21, 2004. *1281 Joseph C. Espy, III, Suzanne D. Edwards, Melton Espy & Williams, PC, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff. Edward Bailey McDo

74 So.3d 1148 (2011) MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. v. Wayne HAGAN and James Joubert. No. 2011-CQ-1039. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 25, 2011. *1149 Phelps Dunbar, LLP, Baton Rouge, Allen D. Darden, Karen Janise Blakemore, Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C., James John Proszek (Pro Hac Vice), For P

[Cite as Hagan v. Hagan, 2019-Ohio-51.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CHRIS L. HAGAN : JUDGES: : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellee : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. : Hon. Earle E. Wise

213 Ga. App. 631 (1994) 445 S.E.2d 380 CAFAGNO v. HAGAN et al. A94A0674. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided June 23, 1994. Zachary & Segraves, Rick S. Sexton, for appellant. Burkett, Schneider & Mumford, William Schneider, for appellees. SMITH, Judge. Linda and Albert Hagan filed a petition to adop

827 A.2d 619 (2003) KINGFIELD WOOD PRODUCTS, INC. v. Thomas HAGAN et all. No. 2002-345-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. July 1, 2003. *621 Marc D. Wallick, Esq., Warwick, for Plaintiff. John T. Walsh, Jr., Esq., Providence, for Defendant. Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., FLANDERS, and GOLDBERG, JJ. OPINION

J-S22015-23 2023 PA Super 256 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : DONALD A. HAGAN :

J-S22015-23 2023 PA Super 256 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : DONALD A. HAGAN :

[Cite as State v. Hagan, 2019-Ohio-1047.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2018-07-136 : OPINION - vs -