Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “Williams v. Delbalso”
77 F.3d 462 Daniel Delbalso, Joseph Delbalso, Michael Delbalso, Delbalso Brothersv.Sue Strassman, Charles Flannery, Jack Jones, John Kebles,William Lisman, William Vinsko, Wilkes-Barre CityPlanning Commission, Lee A. Namey,Wilkes-Barre City NOS. 95-7077, 95-7078 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Jan 02, 1996 Appea
Tyrone Williams v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCIpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 20-2999 ______________ TYRONE WILLIAMS, Appellant v. SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENN- SYLVANIA; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY _______________
Tyrone Williams v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCIpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 20-2999 ______________ TYRONE WILLIAMS, Appellant v. SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY _______________ On Appeal from the United States District C
Richard Olsen v. Gerald T. McFaul Sheriffpublic domain
RYAN, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Olsen was convicted by an Ohio jury of writing a bad check and theft in office. He appeals the denial of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, contending that both convictions are constitutionally invalid. We affirm the denial with respect to the bad check conviction, but reverse with respect to the theft in office charge.
Shore v. Pennsylvania Department of Correctionspublic domain
OPINION BY JUDGE McCULLOUGH Before the Court in our original jurisdiction are the preliminary objections filed by the Department of Corrections (Department) to the petition for review (Petition) filed by Brian Shore. We grant the Department’s objections and dismiss Shore’s Petition. Background On November 21
Commonwealth v. Brown, L.; of: Family Memberspublic domain
[J-6-2025] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 32 EM 2023 : : On King’s Bench petition from the v. : order
State v. Jacksonpublic domain
William B. Brown, J., dissenting. I must dissent because the hearing judge’s sua sponte dismissal of appellee’s petition for post-judgment relief without a hearing is neither consistent with the requirements of R. C. 2953.21 nor with State v. Milanovich (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 46, and its progeny. Herein, main trial counsel, by way of affidavit, informed the hearing judge that because
In re Facebook, Inc.public domain
OPINION SWEET, D.J. Court-appointed Lead Plaintiffs North Carolina Department of State Treasurer on behalf of the North Carolina Retirement Systems (“North Carolina DST”), Arkansas Teacher Retirement Systems (“Arkansas Teacher”), Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association (“Fresno”), Individual Named Plaintiffs Jose G. Galvan and Mary Jane Lule Galvan (the “Galvans”), and additional proposed individu