Cases

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Former decision, 134 S.Ct. 227Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

505 S.E.2d 860 (1998) 234 Ga. App. 211 WEBB v. DANFORTH. No. A98A1475. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 2, 1998. Simpson, Gray & Cross, Ralph F. Simpson, William D. Nesmith III, Joseph I. Carter, Tifton, for appellant. Reinhardt, Whitley & Wilmot, Glenn Whitley, Tifton, for appellant. JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

667 A.2d 847 (1995) Bruce Allen DANFORTH v. Carl GOTTARDI, et al. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Submitted on Briefs October 11, 1995. Decided November 20, 1995. Bruce Allen Danforth, Thomaston, Pro Se. David W. Crook, District Attorney and William Baghdoyan, Assistant District Attorney, Skowhegan, for Defendant. Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, GLA

VERMONT SUPREME COURT Case No. 22-AP-348 109 State Street Montpelier VT 05609-0801 802-828-4774 www.vermontjudiciary.org ENTRY ORDER DECEMBER TERM, 2022 State of Vermont v. William Danforth II* } APPEALED FROM: } Superior Court, Bennington Unit, } Criminal Divisi

12 F.Supp.2d 914 (1998) The FARMERS AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. Gerald DANFORTH as legal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Danforth, Deceased, Defendant. No. 97-C-839. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. July 7, 1998. Michael T. Hopkins, Hopkins Law Office, Mequon, WI, for Plaintiff. William L. Sundberg, Sundberg & Hessm

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ July 31, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A25A0008. DEXTER LAVILE NEW v. WILLIAM DANFORTH, WARDEN et al. Dexter Lavile New appealed directly to this Court from the trial court’s order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court of Georgia has appellate

624 F.3d 915 (2010) Stephen DANFORTH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David CRIST; Minnesota Department of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees. No. 05-3987. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 18, 2010. Filed: October 25, 2010. *916 Jenny Chaplinski, argued, St. Cloud, MN, for appellant.

297 Ga. 29 FINAL COPY S15A0147, S15X0148. DANFORTH v. CHAPMAN; and vice versa. BENHAM, Justice. Justin W. Chapman was convicted of arson and felony murder regarding a 2006 fire that was intentionally set outside the front door of his duplex apartment, resulting in the death of a resident who lived on the other side of the duplex. We affirmed Chapman’s conviction in Chapman v. State, 290 Ga. 631 (724 SE2d 391) (2012). Chapman filed

BENHAM, Justice. Justin W. Chapman was convicted of arson and felony murder regarding a 2006 fire that was intentionally set outside the front door of his duplex apartment, resulting in the death of a resident who lived on the other side of the duplex. We affirmed Chapman’s conviction in Chapman v. State, 290 Ga. 631 (724 SE2d 391) (2012). Chapman filed a petitio

¶1 —A sex offender’s statement to authorities that he will inflict sexually violent harm against minor boys if he is not committed is sufficient evidence of a recent overt act to support a sexually violent predator (SVP) petition when that statement is considered in the context of the sex offender’s history and mental condition. Robert Danforth contends that the trial court erred by denying his summary judgment motion because his statements to the author

956 A.2d 554 (2008) 2008 VT 69 STATE of Vermont v. Douglas DANFORTH. No. 07-017. Supreme Court of Vermont. May 9, 2008. *555 Jane Woodruff, Department of State's Attorneys and Sheriffs, Montpelier, and Vincent Illuzzi, Essex County State's Attorney, Orleans, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Michael Rose, St.

OPINION NIX, Justice.* Appellant Paul A. Reese instituted an action in trespass alleging negligent representation afforded to him by appellees, Theodore S. Danforth, a county public defender and two members of his staff, including a law student certified under Pa.B.A.R.ll. The alleged negligent representations occurred during a proceeding brought against Mr. Reese by the Administ

Justice Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court. New constitutional rules announced by this Court that place certain kinds of primary individual conduct beyond the power of the States to proscribe, as well as “watershed” rules of criminal procedure, must be applied in all future trials, all cases pending on direct review, and all federal habeas corpus proceedings. All other new rules of criminal procedure mu

128 S.Ct. 1029 (2008) Stephen DANFORTH, Petitioner, v. MINNESOTA. No. 06-8273. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 31, 2007. Decided February 20, 2008. *1032 Benjamin J. Butler, Minneapolis, MN, for petitioner. Patrick C. Diamond, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent. Benjamin J. Butler, Couns