Cases

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Causey, Raphael and Senior Judge Clements Argued at Richmond, Virginia YAHSIM TREMAINE WILLIAMS OPINION BY v. Record No. 0545-24-2 JUDGE STUART A. RAPHAEL SEPTE

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Beales, O’Brien, AtLee, Malveaux, Athey, Fulton, Ortiz, Causey, Friedman, Chaney, Raphael, Lorish, Callins, White and Frucci Argued at Richmond, Virginia DAWN LEWIS WILLIAMS OPINION BY v. Record No. 1201-22-2

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Malveaux and Raphael Argued by videoconference MAURICE TIRRELL WILLIAMS OPINION BY v. Record No. 1441-23-1 CHIEF JUDGE MARLA GRAFF DECKER NOVEM

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Fulton, Causey and Lorish Argued by videoconference TRAVIS TREMAINE WILLIAMS OPINION BY v. Record No. 1923-23-2 JUDGE LISA M. LORISH MARCH 4, 20

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges AtLee, Ortiz and Lorish PUBLISHED Argued at Richmond, Virginia DAWN LEWIS WILLIAMS OPINION BY JUDGE LISA M. LORISH v. Record No. 1201-22-2 APRIL 30, 2024 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

VIRGINIA: In the Court of Appeals of Virginia on Tuesday the 4th day of June, 2024. PUBLISHED Dawn Lewis Williams, Appellant, against Record No. 1201-22-2 Circuit Court No. CL21000379-00 Commonwealth of Virginia,

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Petty and Huff Argued at Richmond, Virginia PUBLISHED ROY LEESHUN WILLIAMS OPINION BY v. Record No. 0603-18-2 CHIEF JUDGE MARLA GRAFF DECKER JANUARY 14, 2

RANDOLPH A. BEALES, Judge. Tony Williams (appellant) was found guilty of one count of possession of a Schedule I or II substance with intent to distribute (third offense) in violation of Code § 18.2-248(C). Appellant argues that the trial court erred in finding that it had venue over the offense on the ground that the evidence did not

PETTY, Judge. James Edward Williams was convicted of malicious wounding in violation of Code § 18.2-51. On appeal, Williams argues that the trial court erred in denying jury instructions for the lesser-included offense of unlawful wounding. We disagree and affirm Williams’s conviction.

FRANK, Judge. Orlando Rondell Williams, appellant, was convicted in a bench trial of possession of ammunition for a firearm by a felon, in violation of Code § 18.2-308.2. 1 On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Specifically, appellant contends that the Com

698 S.E.2d 917 (2010) 57 Va. App. 108 Edward A. WILLIAMS v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, REAL ESTATE BOARD. Record No. 2799-09-2. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond. September 14, 2010. *919 Brenda L. Page, Richmond, (Alan F. Duckworth; Page Law Firm, P.C., on briefs), for appellant. Steven P. Jack

ANNUNZIATA, Judge. Maurice K. Williams (“appellant”) appeals his bench trial conviction of misdemeanor escape in violation of Code § 18.2-479, claiming the trial court erred in denying his motion to strike the Commonwealth’s evidence. Specifically, he contends Code § 18.2-479 requires the Commonwealth to prove the class of the offens

679 F.2d 892 Williamsv.Commonwealth of Virginia 80-6729 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit 4/15/82 1 E.D.Va. AFFIRMED

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Milton N. Williams seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on Williams’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition.* The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealabil

VIRGINIA: In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond on Thursday the 20th day of April, 2023. Present: All the Justices Monique Alicia Williams, Appellant, against Record No. 220034 Circuit Court No. CL21001850-00 Commonwealth of Virginia, Appellee.

VIRGINIA: In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond on Thursday the 20th day of April, 2023. Present: All the Justices Monique Alicia Williams, Appellant, against Record No. 220034 Circuit Court No. CL21001850-00 Commonwealth of Virginia, Appellee.

OPINION NORMAN K. MOON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This discrimination and civil rights case is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Anastasia Wootten seeks summary judgment on her Due Process claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Richard Holcomb, Joseph Hill, and Jeannie Thorpe because she was not provided adequate process when fired from her job with the Virginia De

PER CURIAM: Diane Williams appeals the district court’s orders denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motions to reconsider its earlier order granting summary judgment against her and dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Va., State Bd. of Elections, No. 3:11

O’BRIEN, Judge. Jonta Ramsey (“appellant”) challenges his convictions for two felonies after the trial court refused to allow him to withdraw pleas of guilty to the charges. Appellant was arrested after his neighbor’s house was burglarized. Following plea negotiations in general district court, he waived his preliminary hearing and appealed a misdemeanor conviction for damage to

JUSTICE MIMS, concurring. I reluctantly concur with the Court's ruling declining to apply the ends of justice exception to Rule 5:25 in this case. I write separately to emphasize my concern that the existing statutes provide inadequate direction to the courts and to urge the General Assembly to re-examine them. I agree with Justice Powell that, having adjudicated Williams not guilty of the August 2014 offenses by