Cases

PER CURIAM: Charolette A. Williams filed an application for disability insurance benefits with the Commissioner of Social Security; an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denied the application; and the district court affirmed the ALJ’s denial. Williams, proceeding pro se, now appeals the district court’s decision. She argues that (1) the ALJ erred in rejecting the medical opinion of her treating physician, Dr. Ashraf Hanna, and (2

ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (document no. IS), GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (document no. 12), DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (document no. 9), AND DISMISSING CASE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge. The Social Security Administration (“SSA”) denied Plaintiff and claimant Mar

679 F.Supp.2d 664 (2010) Desiree WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:09CV84. United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia. January 6, 2010. *665 Jonathan C. Bowman, Bowman Law Office, Wheeling, WV, for Plaintiff. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, U.S. Attorney's Office, Wheelin

(2008) Debra WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Civ. No. 07-0810(DRD). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. May 5, 2008. OPINION DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge. Plaintiff, Debra Williams, has filed an application for attorney's fees, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Shirley Williams, pro se, appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (David G. Larimer, Judge) entered on April 4, 2006, granting the motion for judgment on the pleadings by the defendant-appellee, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”), and dismissing her complaint challenging the Commissioner’s de

462 F.Supp.2d 411 (2006) Aaron WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 04-CV-6230L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 28, 2006. *412 Aaron Williams, Rochester, NY, pro se. Brian M. McCarthy, U.S. Attorney's Office, Rochester, NY, for Defendant. DECISION

423 F.Supp.2d 77 (2006) Shirley WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 04-CV-6227L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. April 3, 2006. *78 Shirley Williams, Rochester, NY, Pro se. Christopher V. Taffe, U.S. Attorney's Office, Rochester, NY, for Defendant. DECISIO

407 F.Supp.2d 1297 (2005) Alvin WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, No. 6:04-CV-1412OR-31JGG. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. December 21, 2005. *1298 Juan C. Gautier, Law Offices of Juan C. Gautier, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff. Susan R. Waldron, U.S. Attorney's Offic

OPINION SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. Jerome Williams appeals from the adverse decision of the District Court affirming the denial of his application for Social Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. He argues that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”), which was affirmed by the District Court, failed to follow our decisions and was not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree and will affirm. Bec

ORDER Bertha M. Williams appeals a district court judgment that affirmed the Commissioner’s denial of her application for Social Security disability benefits. The parties have waived oral argument, and the panel unanimously agrees that it is not needed in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). Williams alleged that she became disabled on June 30, 1988, due to a loss of visual acuity. An Administrative Law Judge (

OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Circuit Judge. . This is an appeal from a denial of disability benefits under the Social Security Act. Appellant claims the Commissioner of Social Security’s determination was not supported by substantial evidence in the record. He also appeals the denial of his motion to compel discovery before the District Court. We will affirm. I.

104 F.Supp.2d 719 (2000) Sharonlyn WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 99-CV-72641. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. May 12, 2000. Lewis M. Seward, Seward, Tally & Piggott, P.C., Bay City, MI, for plaintiff. Elizabeth J. Larin, Assistant United States Attorney, Detroit, MI, for defendant.<

ORDER Gladys Williams appeals a district court order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of her application for supplemental security income benefits. The parties have waived oral argument and this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). Williams filed an application for supplemental security income benefits alleging that she suffered from headaches, arthritis, stoma

PER CURIAM: Appellant Hans Schink applied for Social Security disability benefits based on various physical impairments and the fact that he suffered from bipolar disorder. The matter proceeded to a hearing before an administrative law judge ("ALJ"), who denied benefits. Schink appealed the decision

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARIANNE O. BATTANI, United States District Judge Plaintiff Koretta J. Wilkerson brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Defendant Commissioner denying her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security’ Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 e

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Mercedes Marinez brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (as incorporated by 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3)) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her claim for supplemental security income (“SSI”) benefits.

PER CURIAM: Teresamingo Gamble, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order affirming the decision of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) to deny her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”). After careful review, we affirm. I. Gamble applied for DIB and SSI on December 8, 2011. She said that she suffered from a number of inju

PER CURIAM: Claimant Betty Mijenes appeals the district court’s order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of her application for supplemental security income. On appeal, Mijenes argues that the ALJ’s residual functional capacity assessment is not supported by substantial evidence. She also challenges the ALJ’s determination that she could perform her past relevant work, as well as the weight the ALJ assig

PER CURIAM: John Zech appeals the magistrate judge’s award of-attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) after his successful appeal of the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On appeal, Zech argues that the district court abused its discretion when it compensated him for the work of two non-admitted attorneys, Howard Olinsky and Paul Eaglin, at the

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Maritza Lopez (“Lopez”) appeals from the August 5, 2014 order and the September 29, 2014 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Carter, J.) affirming the April 2, 2012 final administrative decision denying her application for disability benefits. Lopez challenges this disability determination on the grounds that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) (