Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Williams v. CDCR”
Williams v. Catepublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
People v. Williamspublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JEREMIAH IRA WILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellant. S262229 Fourth Appellate District, Division One D074098 San Diego County Superior Court SCD268493 August 29
People v. Williamspublic domain
Filed 11/23/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A159914 v. JERRY DENTON WILLIAMS, JR., (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. PRL-201698-1) Defendan
People v. Williamspublic domain
Filed 6/17/21 See Concurring Opinion CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, E074162 v. (Super.Ct.No. FSB1300161) JAMES AMBROSIA WILLIAMS, OPINION Defendant and
People v. Williamspublic domain
Filed 4/9/20; reposting corrected document CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D074647 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. PLAN2829) ARNELL WILLIAMS, Defend
People v. Williamspublic domain
Filed 4/9/20 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D074647 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. PLAN2829) ARNELL WILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the
In re Williamspublic domain
Filed 6/20/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN In re No. B286241 (Los Angeles County ANTUAN WILLIAMS Super. Ct. No. PA002551) on Habeas Corpus. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING. Petition for writ of habeas corpus. Relief granted. Tracy Lum for
In re Williamspublic domain
ZELON, J. *796On December 29, 2016, the Board of Parole Hearings found Petitioner Antuan Williams suitable for parole under the youth offender provisions of Penal Code sections 3051 and 4801, subdivision (c). Although that decision became final on April 24, 2017, Williams was not released but required to serve an additional consecutive, eight-y
In re Williamspublic domain
Filed 10/7/15; pub. order 10/23/15 (see end of opn.) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In re STEVEN G. WILLIAMS D066887 on (San Diego County Super. Ct. No. HSC11454) Habeas Corpus. Petition
Adams v. Beardpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jordan v. Diazpublic domain
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United Stat
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW William Alsup, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION In this Title VII and equal protection challenge, a Latino applicant seeks relief after being twice denied employment as a corrections officer. This order includes the findings of fact and conclusions of law following a six-day bench trial. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Cousins v. Lockyerpublic domain
568 F.3d 1063 (2009) William Henry COUSINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bill LOCKYER, (former) Attorney General of California, in his official capacity; Richard Rimmer, (former) Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), in his individual capacity; Roseanne Campbell, (former) Warden of Mule Creek State Prison, in her individual capacity; and John/Jane Does 1 through x, Defendants-Appellees. N
Robinson v. Tiltonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** California state prisoner Regal Robinson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pur*772suant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a district court’s ruling on the merits of a habeas corpus petition, see Sandgathe v. Maass, 314 F.3d 371, 376 (9th C
Garza v. Tiltonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** California state prisoner Roman Guana Garza appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we vacate and remand for further proceedings. The State suggests that we do not have jurisdiction because Garza did not timely file his notice of appeal. We disagree b
Quintero v. Tiltonpublic domain
JUDGMENT CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge. Pursuant to the Order of the Court adopting the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES M
People v. Battenpublic domain
Filed 3/17/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A169597 v. (San Francisco City ANNETTE GAYLENE BATTEN, & County Defendant and Appellant. Super. Ct. No.
People v. Wileypublic domain
Siggins, P.J. *1065Does Penal Code section 13851 authorize a trial court to dismiss a parole revocation petition "in furtherance of justice"? No. The authority to dismiss conferred by section 1385, subdivision (a) is addressed to the criminal charges or allegations in the indictment or information, so we reject d
People v. Hodgepublic domain
Filed 12/27/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, B337339 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA090420) v. JASON ROBERT HODGE, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los A
People v. Hodgepublic domain
Filed 1/3/25 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, B337339 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA090420) v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION JA