Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Williams v. C.D.C.R.”
D.E.C.C. v. K.N.R.public domain
On October 15, 2008, K.N.R. ("the maternal grandmother"), C.S.E. ("the maternal grandfather"), J.F.E. ("the maternal step-grandmother"), and D.L.R. ("the maternal step-grandfather") (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the grandparents") filed a motion in the Walker Juvenile Court seeking an award of custody of J.A.C. and C.B.E. (hereinafter together referred to as "the children"). In that motion, the grandparents alleged that the children's mother, D.E.C.C. ("the mother") had en
KELLY, Judge. In this medical malpractice action, Raymond Santa Lucia appeals from the cost judgment rendered after a jury verdict in his favor. He first contends the trial court abused its discretion in excluding from the cost judgment fees for Lawrence Forman and Dr. Hartley Mellish, the experts who provided testimony on the specific economic losses he incurred as a result of
C.L.C. v. D.W.R.public domain
After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court This court, on February 28, 2003, affirmed the juvenile court's judgment, without an opinion. C.L.C. v. D.W.R., (No. 2010960, February 28, 2003), 883 So.2d 742 (Ala.Civ.App. 2003) (table). The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed this court's judgment and has remanded the case. Ex parte C.L.C., 897 So.2d 234 (Ala. 2004). Accordingl
Williams v. Devell R. Young, M. D., P. C.public domain
542 U.S. 904 WILLIAMSv.DEVELL R. YOUNG, M. D., P. C., ET AL. No. 03-1298. Supreme Court of United States. June 14, 2004. 1 Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 258 Ga. App. 821, 575 S. E. 2d 648.
Williams v. Devell R. Young, M.D., P.C.public domain
Pope, Presiding Judge. In this medical malpractice action, the trial court granted summary judgment to defendants Devell R. Young, M.D., and Devell R. Young, M.D., P.C., on the ground that the statute of limitation had expired before plaintiff Margaret Williams filed her lawsuit. Williams appeals. For reasons stated below, we have decided to adopt the “continuous treatment” doctrine with respect to our statute of limitation
M.D.L. v. M.R.C.public domain
M.D.L. ("the mother") appeals from a final judgment entered by the Madison Juvenile Court on a petition to modify visitation filed by M.R.C. ("the father") with regard to the parties' minor child. We affirm in part and reverse in part. The father filed a petition to modify visitation on December 28, 2001. The mother filed a counterclaim for past-due child support. The parties reached an agreement that was read into the record ("the settlement agreement"). The trial court then d
N.L.R. v. C.A.D.public domain
This is a child-custody case. The trial court awarded temporary custody of two minor children to F.G., the children's maternal grandmother. N.L.R., the children's natural father, appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, which affirmed the judgment of the trial court, without an opinion. N.L.R. v. C.A.D., (No. 2001292, July 12, 2002) ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Civ.App. 2002) (table). N.L.R. petitioned this Court for certiorari review. We granted his petition to consider whether the decis
N.L.R. v. C.A.D. F.G.public domain
On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court This court, on July 12, 2002, affirmed the trial court's judgment, without an opinion. N.L.R. v. C.A.D., (No. 2001292, July 12, 2002) ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Civ.App. 2002) (table). The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed this court's judgment and has remanded the case to this court.Ex parte N.L.R., [Ms. 1012330, March 14, 2003] 863 So.2d 1066 (Ala. 2003). The trial court's judgment is
In re K.R., U.C., and D.C.public domain
FILED March 9, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS O
In re D.C., J.R., and L.R.public domain
FILED September 3, 2024 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST V
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________
Singh v. Jutla & C.D. & R's Oil, Inc.public domain
214 F.Supp.2d 1056 (2002) Macan SINGH, Plaintiff, v. JUTLA & C.D. & R's OIL, INC., Defendants. No. C 02-1130 CRB. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 5, 2002. Sara Campos, Marielena Hincapie, National Immigration Law Center, Oakland, CA, William W. Friedman, Karen G. Johnson-McKewan, Diane L. Webb, Brobeck, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison,
In re R.D. and C.B.public domain
FILED November 8, 2021 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WES
BRADFORD, Judge. Case Summary [1] Appellee-Defendant Richard C. Maples, an Ohio resident, was employed as a truck driver by Appellant-Defendant R & L Carriers, an Ohio limited liability company. The tractor-trailer driven by Maples was owned by Appellee-Defen-dant Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. (“Greenwood”). On February 14, 2012, while in the course
In re A.C., R.C., D.K., and R.K.public domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED In re A.C., R.C., D.K., and R.K. June 11, 2018 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK
In re C-R.D.G.public domain
McGEE, Chief Judge. Respondent-Father appeals from order terminating his parental rights as to his minor daughter C-R.D.G. ("the child"). We reverse and remand. I. Factual and Procedural History Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services, Youth and Family Services Division ("YFS") filed a petition on 6 January 2015 alleging that the child was a neglected and dependent juvenile. YFS st
In re K.D., C.E., and R.E.public domain
FILED March 6, 2024 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA
In re D.R.-1, D.R.-2, J.R. and C.K.public domain
FILED STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS March 16, 2021 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
In re A.G., C.G., T.S., D.G., and R.C.public domain
FILED May 12, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA
In the Int. of: B.A.D., Appeal of: C.R.D.public domain
J-S17031-24 fNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT O.P. 65.37 IN THE INTEREST OF: B.A.D., A : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MINOR : PENNSYLVANIA : : APPEAL OF: C.R.D., MOTHER : : : : :