Cases

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-2-26338-1, Jim Bates, J, entered February 26, 1997. Reversed by unpubbshed opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Becker and Appelwick, JJ.

706 F.Supp.2d 613 (2010) Richard A. SHULTZ, Plaintiff, v. CARLISLE POLICE DEPARTMENT; Corporal William D. Miller; Officer Jeffry Kurtz; Unknown Officers and Agents; and the Borough of Carlisle, Defendants. No. 1:08cv1896. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. April 7, 2010. *616 Debra R. Mehaffie, Scaringi & Scarin

223 P.3d 839 (2009) 2009 MT 411 353 Mont. 492 Ryan FUNKE, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. The ESTATE OF Bert SHULTZ, d/b/a Bayview Center, Defendant, and City of Polson, Defendant and Appellant. No. DA 09-0350. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs October 28, 2009. Decided December 1, 2009. For

214 P.3d 772 (2009) 2009 MT 245 351 Mont. 436 B.J. and J.J., Individually and on behalf of E.J., a minor, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Keith SHULTZ, M.D., Gary Mermel, M.D.; Anesthesia Partners of Montana, Defendants and Appellees. No. DA 08-0215. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs March 4, 2009. Decid

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Nos. 1D17-4237 1D18-1513 _____________________________ RICHARD HENDRICKSON, Appellant, v. WILLIAM P. CERVONE, ROBERT E. WILLIS, DANIEL SLAUGHTER, PATRICK CARDASCO, WINDY PONCE (SNODGRASS), RENNA BROCK, JENNIFER ANN FLINN, DANIEL SWEELEY, and ROBERT SHULTZ, III, Appellees. __

KING, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from the judgment of the district court that defendants-appellees’ cattle-feeding consulting agreements were not investment contracts and were therefore not subject to federal securities regulation. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the judgment of the district court. I.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOSHUA DILLON ROH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-2560 (BAH) KARL L. SCHULTZ, in his official capacity Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell as Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Joshua D

880 F.Supp. 605 (1995) UNITED STATES of America v. Stephen SHULTZ. No. 3:94-CR-67 RM. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. March 2, 1995. *606 *607 William T. Grimmer, Asst. U.S. Atty., South Bend, IN, for plaintiff. Brian J. May, South Bend, IN, for defendan

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC PER CURIAM: We deny the petition for panel rehearing, but write to express our reasons for doing so. I. The sole issue in this appeal was whether the plaintiffs-appellants Jim Long, Jerome

PER CURIAM: This appeal brings before us a challenge by a former Department of State employee to his termination from federal employment a generation ago. The principal issue is whether the District Court erred in refusing to grant injunctive relief to appellant in the form of “retroactive reinstatement” to his former position. Fo

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT In the Estate of Soledad Banegas Shultz, * From the County Court at Law No. 2 deceased, of Ector County, Trial Court No. 24121-CCL2. No. 11-21-00177-CV * September 8, 2022 * Memorandum O

669 F.Supp. 7 (1987) Eugene M. PARNESS, Plaintiff, v. George SHULTZ, Secretary of State, and the United States Department of State, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 86-1456. United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 23, 1987. *8 Israel Teitelbaum, Washington, D.C., James M. Hartmann, New York City, for plaintiff. Geo

614 P.2d 1083 (1980) 94 N.M. 634 William SHULTZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Pete PASCOE and Gwen Pascoe, his wife, Phil Stadtler and Lois Stadtler, his wife, and Dan J. Stadtler and Judy Stadtler, his wife, Respondents-Appellees. No. 12552. Supreme Court of New Mexico. August 4, 1980. Dickson & Young, Silver City, Geer, Handley & Hunt,

706 F.Supp. 54 (1989) Ricardo MALDONADO-SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, v. George P. SHULTZ, Defendant. Civ. No. 87-2654. United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 30, 1989. A. Neal Burkus and Paul E. Mirengoff, Hunton & Williams, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Michael L. Martinez, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for defendant.

#26072-a-GAS 2012 S.D. 53 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** RANDY KRAMER, an Individual, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WILLIAM F. MURPHY SELF- DECLARATION OF TRUST and MIKE D. MURPHY, an Individual, Defendants and Appellees. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF

O'Connor v Shultz (2018 NY Slip Op 07380) O'Connor v Shultz 2018 NY Slip Op 07380 Decided on November 1, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER IN CONTESTED MATTER CONCERNING REOPENING OF THE CHAPTER 7 CASE IN RELATION TO ADMINISTRATION OF A TAX REFUND J. PHILIP KLINGEBERGER, Bankruptcy Judge. The Chapter 7 case of Charles F. Shultz, Sr., and Chrystal L. Shultz (“collectively: Shultz”) began and was initially closed innocuously enough. The case was initiated by a Voluntary Petition filed on September 6, 2

CRAIG, President Judge. Marie Shultz, the claimant and widow of John Shultz, is appealing an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board that affirmed a referee’s decision granting the petition of the employer, LeRoy Roofing Co., for termination of benefits after determining that the claimant had engaged in a meretricious relationship subject to § 307(7) of the Pennsylva*36

605 F.Supp. 1220 (1985) Hortensia Bossi De ALLENDE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. George P. SHULTZ, Secretary of State, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 83-3984-C. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 1, 1985. *1221 Leonard B. Boudin, New York City, Allan R. Rosenberg, Putnam, Bell & Russell, Boston, Mass., for plain

624 F.Supp. 1063 (1985) Hortensia de ALLENDE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. George P. SHULTZ, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 83-3984-C. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 31, 1985. Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard Krinsky & Lieberman, Leonard B. Boudin, New York City, Allan R. Rosenberg, Putnam, Bell & Russell, Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.