Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “William R. Wiley”
State of Tennessee v. William Glenn Wileypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 7, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM GLENN WILEY Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 95-C-1918 Walter C. Kurtz, Judge No. M2007-01299-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 29, 2009 At the conclusion of his second trial, Defendant-Appellant, William G
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00806-CV John L. Wiley and Randi Wiley, Appellants v. William H. Carmean and Linda D. Carmean; Thomas R. Page; Edward J. Mitschke, Jr.; Texas Country Title Co.; and Chicago Title Insurance Company, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 335TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 13,761, HONORA
State v. Wileypublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 492 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 493 Kareem T. Wiley (Wiley) appeals his conviction for trafficking cocaine. On appeal, Wiley contends the trial court erred i
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00806-CV John L. Wiley and Randi Wiley, Appellants v.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00806-CV John L. Wiley and Randi Wiley, Appellants v.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00806-CV John L. Wiley and Randi Wiley, Appellants v. William H. Carmean and Linda D. Carmean; Thomas R. Page; Edward J. Mitschke, Jr.; Texas Country Title Co.; and Chicago Title Insurance Company, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 335TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 13,761, HONORA
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON MOTION FOR REHEARING NO. 03-09-00566-CV David Fernea, Appellant v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-09-002195, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PR
Wiley v. Statepublic domain
2008 OK CR 30 KENDALL DEJUAN WILEY, Appellant v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellee No. F-2007-819. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Decided: December 29, 2008. Caesar Latimer, Tulsa, OK, Counsel for Appellant. Tim Harris, District Attorney, James M. Hawkins Assistant District Attorney, Tulsa County Courthouse Tulsa, OK, Counsel for the State Lisbeth L.
Wiley v. Robert Half International, Inc.public domain
OPINION CHUTICH, Judge. Relator Ulanda Wiley challenges the unemployment-law judge’s decision to deny her unemployment benefits. She contends that her work was not “suitable” as that term is defined in Minnesota Statutes section 268.035, subdivision 23a(g)(4) (2010), and therefore she is eligible for benefits. We affirm the unemployment-law judge’s conclusion that, to be eligible under the unsuitability e
Wiley v. Hartzler (In Re Wiley)public domain
288 B.R. 818 (2003) In re William Carl WILEY, Debtor. William Carl Wiley, Debtor-Appellant, v. Geoffrey Hartzler, Dorothy Hartzler, Creditors-Appellees. No. 02-6057WM. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Eighth Circuit. Submitted February 5, 2003. Filed February 19, 2003. *819 Cynthia F. Grimes, L
Larry Hatfield v. William P. Barrpublic domain
Easterbrook, Circuit Judge. A person "who has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year" is forbidden to possess a firearm. 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). When holding in District of Columbia v. Hell
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. John Doe Nos. 1-30public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES L. COTT, United States Magistrate Judge. In this ease, Plaintiff John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (‘Wiley” or “Plaintiff’) alleges that 30 unidentified “John Doe” defendants used peer-to-peer file-sharing software to illegally copy and distribute Wiley’s copyrighted works and infringe Wiley’s trademarks. John Doe No. 9 (“Doe No. 9”) has moved for a protective orde
State v. Wileypublic domain
[Cite as State v. Wiley, 2025-Ohio-4385.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, Case No. 2025 CA 00003 Plaintiff - Appellee Opinion And Judgment Entry -vs- Appeal from the Licking County Common
Charles R. Otwell, Sr. v. Alabama Power Companypublic domain
BLACK, Circuit Judge: Charles and Judy Otwell, property owners on Smith Lake in north central Alabama; David Billings, another property owner on Smith Lake; and KHFW, LLC, a real estate development company that owns property on- Smith Lake (collectively, Appellants), appeal -the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Appellee Alabama Power Company (Alabama Power) on their
Montoya v. HRW of Las Cruces, Inc. (In Re Wiley)public domain
438 B.R. 331 (2010) In re Harry Carlton WILEY and Virginia Ruth Wiley, Debtors. Philips J. Montoya, Plaintiff, v. HRW of Las Cruces, Inc., Virginia Oxford, Oxford Investments, LLC., First State Bank, Robert Wiley, HRW Family, LLC., Harry Carlton Wiley, Virginia Ruth Wiley, Harry Carlton Wiley, as Trustee of the Wiley Family Trust, First New Mexico Bank, Las Cruces, and Harry Carlton Wiley, as Trustee of the Charles Hayden Wiley and Elnora
People v. Wileypublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ERIC DAVID WILEY, Defendant and Appellant. S283326 First Appellate District, Division Four A165613 Humboldt County Superior Court CR1902147B and CR2101049 June 26,
State of Maine v. William A. Wileypublic domain
LEVY, J. [¶ 1] William A. Wiley appeals from a judgment of conviction of seven counts of unlawful sexual contact (Class C), 17-A M.R.S. § 255-A(1)(E) (2012), and three counts of unlawful sexual contact (Class B), 17-A M.R.S. § 255-A(1)(F) (2012), entered in the trial court (A Murray, J.) following a jury trial. Wiley argues that the court (Hjelm, J.) erred in denying his motion to suppress statements he mad
State v. Wileypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA22-899 Filed 15 August 2023 Person County, No. 18 CRS 51065 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. TERRELL WILEY Appeal by Defendant from Judgment entered 31 March 2022 by Judge William D. Wolfe in Person County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 26 April 2023. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Senior Deputy Attorney Genera
State v. Wileypublic domain
[Cite as State v. Wiley, 2021-Ohio-1756.] COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. William B
State v. Wileypublic domain
441 N.W.2d 629 (1989) 232 Neb. 642 STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Randy R. WILEY, Appellant. No. 88-689. Supreme Court of Nebraska. June 23, 1989. *630 William L. Binkard, South Sioux City, for appellant. Randy R. Wiley, pro se. Robert M. Spire, Atty. Gen., and LeRoy W. Sievers, Lincoln, for