⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “William R. Kowalski v. Mommy Gina Tuna Resources”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009-08-28 · Published · cited 0× · 366 F. App'x 149
ORDER The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009-08-28 · Published · cited 0× · 366 F. App'x 149
ORDER The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2008-08-27 · Published · cited 0× · 574 F. Supp. 2d 1160; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66106
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DAMAGES BARRY M. KURREN, United States Magistrate Judge. Now before the Court is a motion for partial summary judgment filed by Defendants Mommy Gina Tuna Resources, King Tuna, Inc., Joaquin Lu, Citra Mina Seafood Corporation, Richard Friend, and Seafriend (collectively, “the Defendants”). The Defendants se
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2008-08-27 · Published · cited 0× · 574 F. Supp. 2d 1160
(2008) William R. KOWALSKI, Plaintiff, v. MOMMY GINA TUNA RESOURCES, et al., Defendants. William R. Kowalski, Plaintiff, v. Citra Mina Seafood Corporation. William R. Kowalski, Plaintiff, v. Richard Friend, and Seafriend. Civ. Nos. 05-00679 BMK, 06-00182 BMK, 05-00787 BMK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. August 27, 2008.
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2008-08-27 · Published · cited 0× · 574 F. Supp. 2d 1165; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66107
*1166 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON WRITTEN DESCRIPTION INVALIDITY AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANTS’ WRITTEN DESCRIPTION DEFENSE BARRY M. KURREN, United States Magistrate Judge. Now before the Court is a motion for partial summary judgment filed by Defenda
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016-12-12 · Published · cited 0× · 220 F. Supp. 3d 953; 2016 WL 7191568
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge, United States District Court Plaintiff Jodi A. Schwendimann brought this patent infringement action against Defendant Arkwright Advanced Coating, Inc., (“AACI”), and AACI counterclaimed for patent infringement against Schwendimann and one of her businesses, Cooler Concepts, Inc., (“Cooler Concepts”). Both parties’ pate