Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “William R. J. Lamson”
Lamson Petroleum Corp. v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc.public domain
I WOODARD, Judge. Lamson Petroleum appeals the trial court’s judgment concerning accounting. It alleges that the court improperly admitted evidence and improperly relied on evidence when rendering judgment. Because we find no error in the trial court’s rulings, we affirm. [[Image here]] This appeal arises out of the contested ownership of several tracts of land in the Scott Field Area o
Lamson v. Montgomery Cnty.public domain
Argued before Barbera, C.J., Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, JJ. Hotten, J. The issue before us is a request for the release of notes containing possible personnel information, relating to the performance of Bernadette Fowler Lamson ("Petitioner") as an employee of the Montgomery County Attorney's office. Petitioner filed a Maryland Public Informati
Lamson v. EMS Energy Marketing Service, Inc.public domain
DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILLIAM E. CALLAHAN, JR., United States Magistrate Judge. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This action was commenced on July 12, 2011, when the plaintiff, Phillip C. Lamson *805(“Lamson”), filed a complaint naming EMS Energy Marketing Service, Inc. (“EMS”) as the defendant. L
J.R.M.B. v. Alegent Creighton Healthpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/27/2025 09:09 AM CDT - 287 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 319 Nebraska Reports J.R.M.B. V. ALEGENT CREIGHTON HEALTH Cite as 319 Neb. 287 J.R.M.B., a minor child, by
Lamson v. Cotepublic domain
775 A.2d 1134 (2001) 2001 ME 109 Barbara LAMSON v. Mark J. COTE et al. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: May 16, 2001. Decided: July 18, 2001. *1135 William H. Dale, Jensen Baird Gardner & Henry, Portland, ME, for plaintiff. Robert S. Hark, Troubh, Heisler & Piampiano, P.A., Portland,
PER CURIAM. Dr. Jose A. Saporta appeals from the district court’s order granting Dr. Stephenson’s motion for summary judgment. For reversal, Saporta argues that the district court erred in ruling that he was collaterally estopped from litigating the issue of Dr. Stephenson’s negligence. We affirm. •Victor Sa
Stephan, J. Nebraska Beef, Ltd., as the assignee of J.B. Contracting Services, Inc. (J.B. Contracting), asserted claims in this action against Universal Surety Company (Universal) based upon a performance bond pursuant to which ABC Electric, Inc., as principal, and Universal, as surety, undertook certain obligations to J.B. Contracting in connection with a construction project on property owned by Nebraska Beef. The district c
Bank v. Mickelspublic domain
Miller -Lerman, J. I. NATURE OF CASE Carl Bank and Teresa M. Bank sued Dr. Jason J. Mickels and Omaha Orthopedic Clinic & Sports Medicine, P.C. (collectively Mickels), in the district court for Douglas County for medical malpractice and loss of consortium. Their complaint alleged that Dr. Mickels breached the standard of care because he failed to obtain informe
Gloria Carignan v. Paul R. Dumas Jr.public domain
JABAR, J. [¶ 1] Paul R. Dumas Jr. appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Oxford County, Clifford, J.) granting summary judgment in favor of Gloria Carignan and denying Dumas’s motion for summary judgment. Dumas contends that the court erred by interpreting a provision of the Paper Streets Act, 23 M.R.S. § 3031 (2016), to apply retrospectively. We agre
Joseph William Russell v. The State of Wyomingpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2024 WY 126 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2024 November 26, 2024 JOSEPH WILLIAM RUSSELL, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-24-0086 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff).
Lamson Petroleum Corp. v. Hallwood Petroleum Inc.public domain
|, BILLIE COLOMBARO WOODARD, Judge. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no legal or manifest error in the trial court’s decision whatsoever. Judge Brouillette has obviously done a thorough, well researched and carefully thought out, fair and accurate analysis of the facts and law. We adopt his excellent reasons for judgment, below, as the opinion of this court: This is one of a series of ca
Jonas v. Willmanpublic domain
Riedmann, Judge. *64 *253 I. INTRODUCTION Grant Jonas brought a medical malpractice action alleging that his pediatrician failed to diagnose and treat him for congenital bilate
Steen v. Murraypublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LAURIE SMITH CAMP, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Filing No. 41) filed by Defendants Robert Murray (“Murray”), Ryan Boe (“Boe”), and Lamson, Dugan & Murray, LLP (“Lamson Dugan”) (collectively “Defendants”). Also before the Court is the Mo*1032tion to Retransfer
823 So.2d 431 (2002) LAMSON PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. HALLWOOD PETROLEUM INC., et al. No. 02-138. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. July 10, 2002. Rehearing Denied August 21, 2002. *432 Mark H. Tompkins, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants-Appellants, Union Oil Company of California, Petrocorp Inc., Triton Oi
Parshall Christian Order v. BD. OF R., ETC.public domain
315 N.W.2d 798 (1982) PARSHALL CHRISTIAN ORDER, R. E. Parshall and J. A. Parshall, Stewards, Appellants, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, COUNTY OF MARION, Iowa, and Conference Board of Marion County, Iowa, Appellees. No. 65844. Supreme Court of Iowa. February 17, 1982. *799 Craig R. Hastings of Clark, Clark & Hastings, Ames, for appellan
William D. Mundinger Trust v. Zellerspublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Trustee Richard Zellers’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF # 16), and Petitioners’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Claims of Richard G. Zellers, Trustee (ECF # 22). For the following reasons, the Court denies the Trustee’s Motion and grants, in part, and denies, in part, Petitioners’ Motion.
Steen v. Murraypublic domain
ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion to Transfer for Improper Venue (“Defendants’ Motion”), filed by Robert Murray (“Murray”), Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P. (“LDM”), and Ryan Boe (“Boe”) (collectively “Defendants”) on October 4, 2012. Clerk’s No. 25. On October 18, 2012, Richard Steen and Lloydene Steen (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a resistance. Clerk’s No. 28.
Contemporary Industries Corp. v. Frostpublic domain
564 F.3d 981 (2009) CONTEMPORARY INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, doing business as Contemporary Industries Mid-America, Inc., doing business as Contemporary Industries Southern, Inc.; Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of CIC, Appellants, v. Terry G. FROST; M. Sue Schmidt, in her capacity as Trustee of the-Erik N. Frost Irrevocable Trust-Brett R. Frost Irrevocable Trust-Erik N. Frost Irrevocable (QSST) Trust-Brett R. Frost Irrevocable (QSST) Trust
477 N.W.2d 668 (1991) METROPOLITAN FEDERAL BANK OF IOWA, Appellant, v. A.J. ALLEN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. and Baker Electric, Inc., Appellees, and ABAS Partnership, a General Partnership, A.Y. Al-Shash, Ala Daghestani, Jeffrey Smith, Wayne Dennis Supply Company, Hansen Contractors, Ltd., Kennedy and Company, Allied Roofing Services, Inc., and Color, Inc., a Division of Allied, Defendants. No. 90-1380.
Lamson Petroleum Co. v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc.public domain
770 So.2d 786 (2000) LAMSON PETROLEUM COMPANY v. HALLWOOD PETROLEUM, INC., et al. No. 99-1444. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. May 24, 2000. Rehearing Denied August 2, 2000. Writ Denied November 27, 2000. *787 Mark H. Tompkins, Lafayette, LA, Ewell E. Eagan, New Orleans, LA, Counsel