Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 5, 2010 Session WILLIAM J. BRADLEY v. CHRISTY L. BRADLEY Appeal from the Chancery Court for Robertson County No. 18248 Laurence M. McMillan, Chancellor No. M2009-01234-COA-R3-CV - Filed July 8, 2010 Mother filed a petition for an increase in child support, which was denied by the trial cour

699 F.Supp. 618 (1988) Karen CHRISTY and Christy Newsreel Services, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Michael SERVITTO, George O. Bruggeman and The City of Warren, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 83-5418 PH. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D. October 24, 1988. *619 Franklin Richard Brussow, Brussow & Krause, Lansing, Mich., for pla

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER E. BENNNING, ) ) Appellant, )

NUMBER 13-11-00332-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG CHARLOTTE HEARN, Appellant, v. KATHRYN SNAPKA, Appellee. On appeal from the 214th District Court

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-18-00118-CV Jesus VIRLAR, M.D. and GMG Health Systems Associates, P.A., a/k/a and d/b/a Gonzaba Medical Group, Appellants

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-18-00118-CV Jesus VIRLAR, M.D. and GMG Health Systems Associates, P.A., a/k/a and d/b/a Gonzaba Medical Group, Appellants

Opinion filed December 5, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-22-00365-CV __________ BOREN DESCENDANTS AND ROYALTY OWNERS, Appellants V. FASKEN OIL AND RANCH, LTD.; FASKEN LAND AND MINERALS, LTD.; AND FASKEN ROYALTY INVESTMENTS, LTD., Appellees

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA16-525 Filed: 20 December 2016 Buncombe County, No. 13 CVS 4413 KAREN HEAD, Plaintiff, v. GOULD KILLIAN CPA GROUP, P.A., G. EDWARD TOWSON, II, CPA, Defendants. Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 31 December 2015 by Judge William H. Coward in Buncombe County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 17 October 2016. Erwin,

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge Defendants William E. Baroni, Jr. and Bridget Anne Kelly engaged in a scheme to impose crippling gridlock on the Borough of Fort Lee, New Jersey, after Fort Lee's mayor refused to endorse the 2013 reelection bid of then-Governor Chris Christie. To this end, under the guise of conducting a "traffic study," Baroni and Kelly, among others, conspired to limit Fort L

LOURIE, Circuit Judge. This case comes to us on certification of two questions by the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Civil Action No. 95-CV-62, in an interference case. The district court certified the following questions for appeal: 1. Can a patent applicant that prevails in an interference before the B

STROUD, Judge. M Series Rebuild, LLC, (“plaintiff’) appeals from a trial court’s order granting the Town of Mount Pleasant’s (“defendant”) motion and dismissing plaintiff’s claims. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the trial court’s order. I. Background Plaintiff filed a complaint on 17 August 2011 alleging the following: In early 2011, plaintiff contacted Chief Chris Honeycutt with the M

Opinion issued March 7, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00014-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellants V. EDWARD A. AND NORMA KERR, PATTIE ACKERM

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

68 F.3d 1451 Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 14,358Marianne E. FLETCHER, Nancy L. Bartley, Raphael Paganelli,and Charlotte Evans, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ATEX, INC., Defendant,EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.andJenny L. HERMANSON and Christy Scattarella, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.805 MIDDLESEX CORP., f/k/a Atex, Inc., and Apple Computers,Inc., Defendants,Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellee. <

Chief Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court. Texas law has long given effect to a general conveyance of all the grantor’s property in a geographic area, such as a county, 1 the state, 2 or even the United States,

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-02 -000

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

681 S.E.2d 553 (2009) In re BOUNDARY DISPUTE BETWEEN LOTS 97 AND 98 OF the C.M. BOST ESTATE, Anderson/Griffin Properties, LLC, Owner of Lot 97, Petitioner, v. R.L. WALLACE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., and J.M. Barrett and Wife Sheree T. Barrett, Owners of Lot 98, Respondents. No. COA08-1453. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 1, 2009.

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS CHARLOTTE R. WILBORN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF EDWARD E. WILBORN, DECEASED, EDE R. WILBORN, JA’MILLE WILLIAMS WILBORN, AND ESTHER O. MORRIS, Appellants,