Cases

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: William G. Castle appeals his conviction for bank fraud, claiming violation of the Speedy Trial Act and insufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. We do not reach his insufficiency of the evidence claims, for more than seventy nonexcluda-ble days passed between his first appearance and the commencement of his trial. This viol

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NEW CASTLE COUNTY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) C.A. No. N24C-09-072 PRW CCLD ) HERSHA HOSPITALITY ) MANAGEMENT, L.P., ) ) Defendant. )

632 F.Supp.2d 1317 (2009) Sara CASTLE, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Martha MARQUARDT, Dean of Health Services; Joan Thompson, Vice President; Dr. Trina Boteler, Executive Affairs Officer; in their individual capacities, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-0104-WCO. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Gainesville Division. July 2, 2009. *1

LEVINSON, Justice. These consolidated appeals oblige us to revisit Hawai'i Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229, 104 S.Ct. 2321, 81 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984), Hawai'i Housing Authority v. Lyman, 68 Haw. 56, 704 P.2d 888 (1985), and Takabuki v. Housing Finance and Development Corp., 72 Haw. 466, 822 P.2d 955 (1991), in order to address the question whether the Hawai'i Land Reform Act, Hawai'i Revised S

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit May 15, 2020 PUBLISH Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court

BONITA H. MARSHALL v. SAFEWAY, INC. NO. 56, SEPTEMBER TERM, 2013 IN THIS PUTATIVE CLASS ACTION SUIT AGAINST SAFEWAY FOR APPLYING A LEGALLY INCORRECT STANDARD IN ESTABLISHING AN EMPLOYEE’S EXEMPTION IN WAGE GARNISHMENT PROCEEDINGS, THE COURT HELD: A. WITH EXCEPTIONS NOT RELEVANT HERE, THE CURRENT REQUIRED EXEMPTION IS THE GREATER OF (1) 75% OF THE DISPOSABLE WAGES DUE, OR (2) 30 TIMES THE MINIMUM HOURLY WAGE UNDER THE FEDERAL FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT; B. EMPLOYEES HAVE A DIRECT CI

DEBORAH S. EYLER, J. In the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Bonita Marshall, the appellant, sued her employer, Safeway, Inc. (“Safeway”), the appellee, alleging that, as to her and a class of similarly situated employees, Safeway had violated the Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law, Md.Code (2008 Repl.Vol., 2010 Supp.), section 3-501 et seq. of the Labor and Employment Article (“LE”) (“the Payment Law”)

JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Richard Jordan and Ricky Chase and Intervenor Thomas Loden are prisoners awaiting execution in the state of Mississippi. They sued under § 1983 in federal district court seeking an injunction preventing the state from conducting executions with compounded pentobarbital. The district court granted a broad preliminary injunction. Be

Case: 15-60604 Document: 00513567316 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/27/2016 REVISED JUNE 27, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-60604 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED RICHARD JORDAN; RICKY

PROCEEDINGS: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. On January 12, 2009, real party in interest William Lansdale filed a notice of appearance and the parties and Lansdale filed a joint stipulation regarding plaintiffs motion to compel production of documents and a joint appendix of exhibits in support of the joint stipulation,

419 P.2d 486 (1966) Charles E. MARSHALL, Administrator of the Estate of Henry Verne Field, Deceased, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William L. MINLSCHMIDT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10925. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted September 12, 1966. Decided October 27, 1966. *487 Robert L. Johnson (argued) Lewistown, Raymond

O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge, and PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge, join: The majority opinion ignores guiding principles announced in DeShaney,1 leaving us both adventurous and alone,2 dra-*1131matieally separated from other

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand’s Non-final Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) [79] on Defendant John Marshall Law School, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment [57]. I. BACKGROUND A. Facts1 Plaintiffs Kamin

690 F.Supp.2d 378 (2010) Bryan L. MOORE, Plaintiff, v. DARLINGTON TWP., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1012. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. February 17, 2010. *380 William G. Cohen, New Castle, PA, for Plaintiff. Patricia A. Monahan, Danielle M. Vugrinovich, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman &a;

698 A.2d 1106 (1997) 347 Md. 90 Joseph N. SCHALLER, Trustee et al. v. CASTLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al. No. 102, Sept. Term, 1996. Court of Appeals of Maryland. August 27, 1997. *1107 Stephen J. Hughes (J. Preston Turner, Treanor, Pope & Hughes, on brief), Towson, for Petitioners. Walter C.

OPINION McKEE, Chief Judge. This appeal arises from a suit against five Federal Officials, three of whom were employed by the Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) 1 , and two of whom were employed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and who were assigned to the FBI’s Joint Terrorism

366 F.3d 1093 Jessica GONZALES, individually and as next best friend of her deceased minor children Rebecca Gonzales, Katheryn Gonzales and Leslie Gonzales, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF CASTLE ROCK; Aaron Ahlfinger; R.S. Brink; Marc Ruisi, Officers of the Castle Rock Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.Colorado Municipal League; Colorado Counties, Inc.; and Colorado Association of Chiefs of Police, Amici Curiae.

937 F.2d 868 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 7791 Gary E. HINDES, Appellant,v.Michael N. CASTLE; Friends of Mike Castle; Dale E. Wolf;Committee to Elect Dale Wolf; William E. Manning;Bruce E. Winn; Carl Hostetter; JohnC. Sargent, and Michael E. Harkins. No. 90-3528. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Jan. 28, 19

740 F.Supp. 327 (1990) Gary E. HINDES, Plaintiff, v. Michael N. CASTLE, Friends of Mike Castle, Dale E. Wolf, Committee to Elect Dale Wolf, William E. Manning, Bruce E. Winn, Carl Hostetter, John G. Sargent and Michael E. Harkins, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 89-564 LON. United States District Court, D. Delaware. June 26, 1990. *328 <

OPINION OF THE COURT SLO VITER, Chief Judge. Gary Hindes appeals from the district court’s order 740 F.Supp. 327, dismissing his complaint for failure to state a valid claim under RICO, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (1988). Hindes was the unsuccessful Democratic candidate for Lieutenant Governor of Delaware in 1988. He brought this suit against Dale Wolf and M