Cases

THOMAS, Judge. *307John Lamar ("the husband") has filed a petition for the writ of mandamus with this court, seeking an order compelling the Clarke Circuit Court ("the trial court") to enter a judgment divorcing him from Alrica Bell Lamar ("the wife") and resolving the issue of the custody of the parties' child. According to the statements in t

THOMAS, Judge. *307John Lamar ("the husband") has filed a petition for the writ of mandamus with this court, seeking an order compelling the Clarke Circuit Court ("the trial court") to enter a judgment divorcing him from Alrica Bell Lamar ("the wife") and resolving the issue of the custody of the parties' child. According to the statements in t

807 F.Supp. 121 (1992) Mitchell C. STRICKLAND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LAMAR COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. A. 86-167-2-MAC (WDO). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division. November 25, 1992. *122 H. Christopher Coates, Milledgeville, Ga., Randal A. Mangham, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintif

21 So.3d 1166 (2009) Christopher Wayne WALTERS v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 2008-CP-01780-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. November 19, 2009. Christopher Wayne Walters (Pro Se). Office of the Attorney General by John R. Henry, Jr., attorney for appellee. Before CARLSON, P.J., RANDOLPH and KITCHENS, JJ. RANDOLPH, Justice, for the Court.

WALLER, CHIEF JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT; ¶ 1; A Rankin County jury found Douglas Walters guilty of grand larceny, and he was sentenced to serve ten years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections. Walters now appeals to this Court, arguing that the trial court erred in its application of the grand-larceny statute, in quashing a codefendant’s subpoena, and in admitting unauthenticated hearsay in

KITCHENS, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Expro Americas, LLC (“Expro”) filed a complaint in the Chancery Court of the First Judicial District of-Jones County, seeking, inter alia, a temporary restrain*1012ing order and applying for a preliminary injunction against Eddie, Walters, a former Expro employee, and H & H Welding, LLC (“H .&

Hunter, J. Defendant-appellant, William Jesse Lamar, was charged with first degree murder by lying in wait in the death of Mary Ellen Griepenstroh.1 After trial by jury, he was found guilty and sentenced to death. On appeal from that judgment, the following issues are presented for our review: 1. Did the trial court err in admitting testimony concerning an out-of-court decl

Case: 14-14054 Date Filed: 02/03/2020 Page: 1 of 61 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-14054 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cv-02094-EAK-TGW RAY LAMAR JOHNSTON,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-00094-COA CONSOLIDATED WITH NO. 2005-KA-00379-COA LEON LAMAR TROTTER A/K/A LEON APPELLANT TROTTER v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/26/2018 TRIAL JUDGE:

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-06-00103-CR _____________________

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2008-CP-01780-SCT CHRISTOPHER WAYNE WALTERS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/09/2008 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LESTER F. WILLIAMSON, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAUDERDALE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: CHRISTOPHER W AYNE WALTERS (PRO SE) ATTORNEY FOR

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17‐1650, 17‐2854, 17‐2858, 17‐2877, 17‐2899, 17‐2917, 17‐2918, 17‐2931, 17‐3063, & 17‐3449 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. BYRON BROWN, et al., Defendants‐Appellants.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17‐1650, 17‐2854, 17‐2858, 17‐2877, 17‐2899, 17‐2917, 17‐2918, 17‐2931, 17‐3063, & 17‐3449 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. BYRON BROWN, et al., Defendants‐Appellants.

Opinion filed December 23, 2010 In The

Justice BRISTER, joined by Justice HECHT and Justice WILLETT, dissenting. Selling damaged property is not the same as damaging property. Among other differences, only the latter begets a claim for property damage. When the homebuyers here sued their builder for construction defects, they did not claim the builder damaged their property; instead, they alleged broken promises and breached duties c

Opinion filed December 23, 2010 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-09-00055-CR __________ PATRICK LAMAR ANDREWS, JR., Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 385th District Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ No. 05-0832 ════════════ Lamar

*731 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI LAMAR, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Holly McKnight and Walter Jenkins were married from April 24, 1972, until June 3, 2004. The parties have one daughter who was born on April 26, 1996. After the parties divorced in 2004, they initially shared joint legal custody of their child, with Holly having p

WALLER, CHIEF JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Floyd McKee filed, an election contest with the Clay County Democratic Executive Committee (CCDEC) after he was defeated by Joe Chandler in the Democratic primary run-off election for District 5 Supervisor of Clay County. After the CCDEC ruled in favor of Chandler, McKee filed a petition for judicial review in Clay

MARKMAN, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I agree with the majority opinion to the extent that it holds that the Fifth Amendment does not preclude the use of false statements by a law enforcement officer in a prosecution for obstruction of justice. However, I respectfully disagree with it to the extent that it holds that the disclosures by law enforcement officers a