Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “William L. Hunt and Drucilla Hunt”
Cockerham v. Cockerhampublic domain
16 So.3d 1264 (2009) Clarence Harvey COCKERHAM, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellee v. John L. COCKERHAM, Jr. and Melissa Jordan Cockerham, Defendants-Appellants. No. 44,578-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. August 19, 2009. *1266 Knight Law Firm by, Robert Thomas Knight, for Appellants. Kitchens, Benton, Kitchens &
Mills v. Abbottpublic domain
350 S.W.3d 813 (2011) Melbourne MILLS, Jr; Bertha Darlene La; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Mildred ABBOTT; Lisa Abraham; Juanita Alton; Joann Alvey; Cindy Armstrong; Linda Back; Carla Baldwin; Lee Bartley, Jr; Patricia Belcher; Leisa Belding: Eleanor Berry; Margie Berry; Carol Boggs; Angie Bowman; James Branham; Kathy Branham; Norma Brewer; Karen Brown; Deborah Browning; Nathaniel Brumfield, on behalf
Nelson v. Bonnerpublic domain
829 So.2d 700 (2002) Arletha NELSON, Mack Arthur Gandy and Bobby Joe Gandy, Appellants, v. Armatha BONNER, Johnnie M. Bonner Simmons, Bennie L. Bonner, Dollie M. Bonner Simpson, Jimmy L. Bonner, Yvonne Bonner, Levoner Bonner, Yonia Bonner, Leon Bonner, Lonnie Bonner, Levester Bonner, Juanita Bonner Jones And Drucilla Bonner, Appellees. No. 1999-CA-01090-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi.
Abbott v. Chesleypublic domain
Opinion of the Court by Justice VENTERS. This case arose in the aftermath of the settlement of Darla S. Guard, et' ál. v. American Home Products, Inc. (Guard).1 The Guard case, which is also known as “Jonetta Moore, et al. v. American Home Products, Inc.,” or the “Moore ” case, was brought by Kentucky residents who had taken th
Alaniz v. California Processors, Inc.public domain
OPINION ORRICK, District Judge. On April 1, 1976, this Court approved a settlement in this class action employment discrimination suit affecting employment practices in the food processing and canning industry in Northern California. The Settlement Agreement and Consent Decree (the Decree), effective June 15, 1976, altered seniority, job bidding, and job-training procedures within the industry and establishe
Alaniz v. California Processors, Inc.public domain
OPINION ORRICK, District Judge. De Tocqueville, almost one hundred fifty years ago, in his celebrated comment, said “Scarcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question”.1 Today, any economic and/or social question becomes a political question and almost invariably is resolved into a judicial question. De Toc
United States v. Wiley's Cove Ranchpublic domain
JOHN E. MILLER, Chief Judge. This is a civil action by the United States to recover payments made by the Department of Agriculture to the defendant partnership for livestock feed under the 1954 Emergency Feed Program. The defendant has filed, under Rule 12(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., a motion for judgment on the pleadings to which is attached the affidavit of two Committeemen. The motion is erroneously d
Sims v. Brownpublic domain
WILLIAMS, C. This is an action under section '2535, Revised Statutes 1909', to quiet title to an un-Quieting 1 e' divided one-sixth interest in the southwest quarter of section 2, township 55, range 14, containing 160 acres more or less, in Randolph county, Missouri. The' suit was originally begun in the circuit court of Randolph county, and was afterwards by agreement of the parties transferred to the circuit court of Chariton c