Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

LEE, C.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Sandra F. Hanson appeals the judgment of the Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Commission (the Commission) finding that she is not entitled to an award of permanent partial disability and denying certain medical testing. Finding no error, we affirm. . PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶ 2. Hanson filed a petition to controvert alleging that she had rece

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION OF DEFENDANT, TOWN OF HANSON, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY #28); MOTION OF DEFENDANTS, MICHAEL FINGLAS, SR., AND JEAN MARIE SMITH, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY # 30) BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before this court is a motion filed by defendant Town of Hanson (“the Town”) for summary judgment and a motion filed by defendants Michael Fingías, Sr.

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Daniel Hanson appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which challenges his state conviction for fleeing and eluding a Wisconsin traffic officer. At his trial, Hanson sought to introduce testimony that the police officer from whom he fled had a “confrontational, aggressive and hot-tempered” character, but the trial

ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge. John Murrin appeals three final orders of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota. Trustee Randall Seaver opposes the appeal separately, and the other Appellees join together in opposition. For the reasons set forth below, the Court affirms the orders denying relief from the bankruptcy stay, and reverses and remands the decision of the bankr

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SCOTT HANSON, No. 19-35839 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:16-cv-00421- BLW WILLIAM SHUBERT; JESUS GONZALEZ, Defendants-Appellants, OPINION and BLAINE COUNTY; GOODING COUNTY; JUDITH PETERSON; GENE

Per Curiam. The trial court, having concluded as a matter of law that this was a proper action to quiet title, entered a judgment dividing a piece of disputed property. None of the original plaintiffs participates in this appeal. We reverse and remand. I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY These consolidated appeals arise from a property dispute involving a stretch of land located in Grayl

C.J. Williams, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on cross motions for a determination of the applicable body of law. (Docs. 69, 70). The parties timely filed resistances to the opposing party's motion. (Docs. 73, 74; see also Doc. 67 (setting scheduling order deadlines, including the deadlines for briefing the choice of law issues) ). For the following reasons, the Court finds that Iowa law is to

HASELTON, P. J. Husband petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in Hanson and Hanson, 192 Or App 422, 86 P3d 94 (2004). We allow reconsideration to correct our description of husband’s argument, but adhere to our previous opinion in all other respects. In our previous opinion, we affirmed the trial court’s refusal to apply a marketability discount to husband’s 100 percent ownership in a closely

LANDAU, J. In a warranty deed granting the state an interest in real property, plaintiffs’ predecessors expressly reserved an easement of access to a state highway. The state later denied plaintiffs the access that the deed expressly reserved. Plaintiffs demanded payment for the taking of their easement. The trial court held that the state must pay, and a jury awarded plaintiffs compensation for the taking. The trial court enter

107 B.R. 525 (1989) In re Kathleen Joyce HANSON, Debtor. Peter L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. Kathleen Joyce HANSON, George Vogel, Trustee, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 7-89-00035, Adv. No. 7-89-0066. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. October 18, 1989. *526 Mark J. Small, Roanoke, Va., for Peter L. Wi

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-6023 ___________________________ In re: Sheri Lynn Hanson, formerly known as Sheri Lynn Alger lllllllllllllllllllllDebtor ------------------------------ Sheri Lynn Hanson llllll

HASELTON, P. J. Husband appeals, and wife cross-appeals, from a judgment of dissolution of marriage. Husband raises a variety of assignments of error pertaining to the trial court’s valuation of husband’s 100 percent ownership in Northwest Stamping, Inc. (NSI), a closely held corporation. Wife’s cross-appeal challenges the trial court’s valuation of certain aircraft. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3),1

PER CURIAM. In this securities class action lawsuit, class member James Hayes appeals the district court’s 1 order approving a settlement and its judgment of dismissal. Because Hayes did not timely raise (if at all) in the district court the issues he argues on appeal, we do not consider them. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

554 N.W.2d 642 (1996) 5 Neb. App. 28 Gloria K. SASS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mary E. Keyes, appellant, v. Randall C. HANSON and Abrahams, Kaslow & Cassman, a Nebraska partnership, appellees. Robert KEYES, Appellant, v. Randall C. HANSON and Abrahams, Kaslow & Cassman, a Nebraska partnership, Appellees. Nos. A-95-611, A-95-612. Court of Appeal

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 361 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 362 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE N

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. William Adams (appellant) appeals from a final order entered in the District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Missouri returning appellant’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition for a writ of habeas corpus because it failed to substantially comply with the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in t

OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. On March 4, 2011, El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership” or “El Paso MLP”) bought a 25% interest in Southern Natural Gas Co. (“Southern”). The seller was El Paso Corporation (“El Paso Parent”), the parent company of the Partnership’s general partner, El Paso Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C. (the “General Partner”).

SHORTESS, Judge. These consolidated suits arose out of a collision in Lafourche Parish. Both are wrongful death actions. Multiple defendants are involved, including the State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) and the Lafourche Parish Police Jury (Police Jury). After trial judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs in both actions. The trial court dismissed some defendants but

SALADINO, Bankruptcy Judge The debtor appeals from an order of the bankruptcy court1 sustaining the trustee’s objection to an exemption claimed by the debtor. Specifically, the bankruptcy court held that a Minnesota property tax refund under Minn. Stat. Ann. § 290A.04 (West) is not exempt under Section 550.37 (Subd. 14) of the Minnesota statutes as “government assistance based on need,” following