Cases

Curran, Dennis J., J. This wrongful death action arises from a car accident that occurred on December 12, 2006 involving Jamisha King-Moore. Three years after the crash, Ms. King-Moore died from a complex autoimmune disease known as systemic scleroderma. At trial, the plaintiff Ronald Glover, the administrator of Ms. King-Moore’s estate, plans to offer the expert testimony of James Seibold, M.D. Dr. Seibold will testify that phy

Nancy Steffen Rahmeyer, J. A jury found William J. Kearnes (“Defendant”) guilty of stealing a tractor and brush hog, and the trial court sentenced him as a prior offender to ten years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Defendant appeals and raises three points— (1) the trial court “plainly erred in not declaring a mistrial sua sponte ” when the prosec

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff, BACHE & CO., instituted this action in June of 1970 in a federal district court in Miami, Florida, against defendants, William J. Taylor, Jr., C. Sue Burnstein, and Kenneth Burn-stein, seeking recovery upon a promissory note and compensatory and punitive damages for common law fraud and for alleged violat

MERCIER, Judge. In Case No. A16A1753, Cheryl Fields, individually, and as the administrator of the estate of Laura Josey, William Josey, and Pamela Denney (collectively “Fields”), appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to William Taylor, Jr.; Southeast Geriatrics, PC.; THI of Georgia at Shamrock, LLC d/b/a Shamrock Nursing and Rehabilitation Center; and John/Jane Does

MARY W. SHEFFIELD, P.J. William Scott Taylor (“Husband”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Colleen Melissa Taylor (“Wife”) and dividing their marital property. Husband raises three points relied on, challenging the trial court’s classification and division of property.1 Husband’s points are without merit because they ignore the standard of review, and the trial cour

815 F.Supp.2d 521 (2011) The GERFFERT COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM J. HIRTEN COMPANY, LLC, James Dean, and ABC Companies, Defendants. C.A. No. 10-101 S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. September 7, 2011. *523 Brenda Coville Harrigan, Gunning & Lafazia, Inc., Warwick, RI, Joshua J. Kaufman, Meaghan H. Ke

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

MURDOCK, Justice. Alice Lynn Harper Taylor ("Alice") petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directed to the Monroe Probate Court requiring that court to enter orders (i) reinstating her petition to probate a will allegedly executed by Alice Earle Harper in 2007 ("the 2007 will"), (ii) reinstating her petition contesting the 2007 will, and (iii) transferring her contest of the 2007 will to the Monroe Circuit Court pursuant to §

WINOKUR, J. Appellants (collectively “Taylor”) filed a post-trial motion for attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to section 768.79(1), Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442. The trial court denied the motion on the authority of Borden Dairy Co. of Alabama, LLC v. Kuhajda, 171 So.3d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (holding that a proposal for sett

HILL, J.: **210*725Seven hours and twenty minutes into their deliberations following four days of trial, the jury in Billy L. Taylor's criminal trial informed the trial court they were at an impasse. The trial court sent the jury home for the night. The ne

Vaccine Act; Motion for Review of Special Master’s Decision; DTaP Vaccination; Infantile Spasms; Lack of Evidence of Causation; Althen Test. OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. This case comes before the Court on review of Special Master Dee Lord’s September 20, 2012 decision denying compensation to Pet

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge. This appeal is from a final order granting joint legal custody of a child to the father and the maternal grandmother, but primary physical custody to the grandmother. We reverse. The minor child, D. B., was born August 19, 2008, to two unmarried parents, David Bell, Jr., and Kristy Taylor. In 2011 both parents consented to the maternal grandmother, Misty Taylor, being the tempora

Opinion BAXTER, J. On November 7, 2006, the voters enacted Proposition 83, The Sexual Predator Punishment and Control Act: Jessica’s Law (Prop. 83, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 7, 2006); hereafter Proposition 83 or Jessica’s Law). “Proposition 83 was a wide-ranging initiative intended to ‘help Californians better protect themselves, their children,

STEWART, J., dissenting. 11 What is clear in this case is that the evidence proves that the Pesnell family acquired ownership of the land up to the Old Fence by virtue of BO years of possession under La. C.C. art. 3486. Therefore, Dumas could not have acquired ownership by title of the disputed area when he acquired the adjoining tract in November 2000. The evidence proves that when Dumas had the land surveyed

GARY W. LYNCH, J. Eight days before her death, Betty Killian amended the Betty J. Killian Revocable Trust (referred to as "Betty's Trust" or "her Trust") to remove her son, Joseph ("Joe") Killian, as a beneficiary, thereby leaving the entirety of her Trust estate to her other son, William ("Bill") Killian.1 Following Betty's death, Joe filed a petition against the Trust Company of the Ozarks

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON ORDER REGARDING CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Stephani W. Humrickhouse, United States Bankruptcy Judge This matter came before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. A hearing was held in Raleigh, North Carolina on September 29, 2016. The court entered its Order Regarding Cross Motions for Summary Judgment on March 31, 2017. This supplemental opinion is intended to p

ORDER PER CURIAM William E. Taylor (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his amended motion based on a claim that his trial counsel was ineffective due to a conflict of interest and for failing to request a change of venue. We affirm.

460 B.R. 673 (2011) Carole L. TAYLOR, a/k/a Carol Thompson-Taylor, Plaintiff, v. Ronda J. WINNECOUR, Chapter 13 Trustee, Margaret Messmer, Defendants. No. 11cv0739. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. July 26, 2011. Marvin Leibowitz, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff. *674 Ronda J. Winnecour, Office of the Chapter

968 S.W.2d 900 (1997) STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. William J. TAYLOR, Appellant. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. August 15, 1997. Permission to Appeal Denied March 2, 1998. *902 Michie Gibson, Jr., Nashville, TN, for Appellant. Charles W. Burson, Attorney General and Reporter, Michael J. Fahey, II