⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “William H. Rhoden and Joy F. Rhoden”

Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2022-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 Ark. 94
Cite as 2022 Ark. 94 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 21, 2022 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2022 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PERCURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2022 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2022. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, attached
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004-09-10 · Published · cited 20× · 897 So. 2d 207; 2004 WL 1178742
897 So.2d 207 (2004) Karen BRACKIN v. TRIMMIER LAW FIRM, Alabama Credit Union League, and Jo Lynn Rutledge. Family Security Credit Union v. Karen Brackin. 1021005 and 1021593. Supreme Court of Alabama. May 28, 2004. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing September 10, 2004. Order Overruling Rehearing Applications and Statement of Nonrec
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2005-11-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 23, 2003 DOLWIN DEON CORMIA v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 238254 Douglas A. Meyer, Judge No. E2003-00653-CCA-R3-PC Filed November 28, 2005 A Hamilton County jury con
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 23, 2003 DOLWIN DEON CORMIA v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 238254 Douglas A. Meyer, Judge No. E2003-00653-CCA-R3-PC October 27, 2003 A Hamilton County jury convic
Supreme Court of the United States · 1990-06-25 · Published · cited 952× · 111 L. Ed. 2d 224; 110 S. Ct. 2841; 497 U.S. 261; 1990 U.S. LEXIS 3301; 58 U.S.L.W. 4916
Justice Brennan, with whom Justice Marshall and Justice Blackmun join, dissenting. “Medical technology has effectively created a twilight zone of suspended animation where death commences while life, in some form, continues. Some patients, however, want no part of a life sustained only by medical technology. Instead, they prefer a plan of medical treatment that allows nature to take its course and perm