Cases

576 S.E.2d 336 (2003) Mary JORDAN, Alphonso Little, Lee Broadie, Walter Weathers, Jon Curry, Robert Baley, Theodore Rankin, John White, Florence Geer, Sally Grier, Esther Gainer, Jerry Nivens, James Earnhardt, Helen Bailey, Norman Huffman, Frances Stitt, Cola McLeod, Thomas Hunter, Rachel Campbell, Sophie Anthony, Jane Canipe, Richard Rankin, Peggy Campbell, Willie Kay, David Ealey, Wilson Johnson, Edward Biggers, Gwendolyn Sellers, Gerald Rudd, Brian Lo

PER CURIAM: CONTENTS Page I. Background. 477 II. Discussion. 482 A. Standard of Review. 482 B. High Volume Criteria. 483 1. Congressional Intent. 483 2.

870 S.W.2d 556 (1993) James F. SRITE and Erma M. Srite; James H. Bell and Mickey Bell; Estate of Otis Burt, Mable Burt, Ronald Burt, Kathy Hunter, and Gloria Polumbo, Appellants, v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., Fibreboard Corporation, and Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Appellees, Raymond JOCHIM and Mary Jochim; Clarence Ben and Ednora Ben; Erma Rae Friley, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Joseph Friley; James Morris and Helen Mor

Cite as 2023 Ark. 67 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: April 20, 2023 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2023 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2023 annual attorney-license fee was April 17, 2023.1 As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, attached

141 F.Supp.2d 592 (2001) Gwendolyn FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. William A. HALTER,[1] Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. Civ. 3:00CV397-H. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. April 10, 2001. *593 John F. Eichorn, Rockingham, NC, for plaintiff. Joseph L. Br

Cite as 2022 Ark. 94 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 21, 2022 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2022 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PERCURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2022 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2022. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, attached

NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion

VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge, concurring. I agree with Judge Hunter’s opinion that under the Education For All Handicapped Children Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1401-1420 (1976), it is up to‘the states, not Congress, to establish educational goals for handicapped children. I agree also that the inflexible application of a 180-day maximum in every instance, regardless of the needs of the child or the resources available, vi

Rose, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Seibert Jr., J.), entered July 19, 2011 in Saratoga County, ordering, among other things, equitable distribution of the parties’ marital property, upon a decision of the court. Plaintiff (hereinafter the husband) and defendant (hereinafter the wife) were married in 1999 and are the parents of two children, a daughter (born in 2002) and a son (born in 2004).

Rose, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Seibert Jr., J.), entered July 19, 2011 in Saratoga County, ordering, among other things, equitable distribution of the parties’ marital property, upon a decision of the court. Plaintiff (hereinafter the husband) and defendant (hereinafter the wife) were married in 1999 and are the parents of two children, a daughter (born in 2002) and a son (born in 2004).

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Considering an entire state legislative mechanism in the abstract without any challenged conduct or legislative act, the majority strikes down as unconstitutional South Carolina’s legislative delegation system. This heavy-handed intrusion into the heart of state government represents an unwarranted extension of federal judicial power, justified only by generalities and irre

552 S.E.2d 880 (2001) 251 Ga. App. 110 SWAIN v. The STATE. No. A01A1018. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 20, 2001. Reconsideration Denied August 8, 2001. *881 Head, Thomas, Webb & Willis, William C. Head, Atlanta, for appellant. Gwendolyn R. Keyes, Solicitor-General, Frank M.

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Jimmie Huff and William Schoolman had been working for UARCO for twenty-four years and thirty-two years respectively when UARCO demoted them from their long-held supervisory positions. Both Huff and Schoolman claimed the demotions were the result of age-related bias. Schoolman additionally claimed that UARCO discriminated against him because of

400 F.Supp.2d 134 (2005) Besseye NEAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTOR, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-2420 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2005. *135 Ted Justice Williams, Avis E. Buchanan, DC, Public Defender Service, Jeffrey Fred Liss, Mary Elizab

MYERS, J., for the Court. FACTS ¶ 1. David and Joan Vincent were granted a divorce by the Chancery Court of DeSoto County on February 24, 1997. The decree awarded both parents joint legal and physical custody of their three minor children. In November 1997, David and Joan agreed to alternate terms for child visitation, as permitted in the decree. These alternate terms gave David custody of

404 F.Supp. 391 (1975) Joseph L. ELLIS et al. v. NAVAL AIR REWORK FACILITY, ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA, et al. Etta B. SAUNDERS, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. John W. WARNER, in his capacity as Secretary of the Navy, et al. (two cases). Jadell BELL, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. John W. WARNER, in his capacity as Secretary of the Navy, et al. Gwendolyn DAWSON, Indi

404 F.Supp. 377 (1975) Joseph L. ELLIS et al. v. NAVAL AIR REWORK FACILITY, ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA, et al. Etta B. SAUNDERS, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. John W. WARNER, in his capacity as Secretary of the Navy, et al. (two cases). Jadell BELL, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. John W. WARNER, in his capacity as Secretary of the Navy, et al. Gwendolyn DAWSON, Indi

244 B.R. 358 (1999) In re UNCLAIMED FREIGHT OF MONROE, INC. Bankruptcy No. 98BK-30119. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana, Monroe Division. October 29, 1999. Decision Supplementing Opinion November 2, 1999. *359 *360 John T. Scott, Monroe, LA, for Debtor. Roland Cha

173 F.Supp.2d 1057 (2001) Kandee LEWIS, aka Kandee Denise Lewis, aka Kandee Gilbert-Lewis, Petitioner, v. Gwendolyn MITCHELL, Respondent. No. CV 01-4943-NM(RC). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 6, 2001. *1058 Kandee Lewis, Chowchilla Central California Womens' Facility, Chowchilla, CA, pro se. Marc A

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1831 Doc: 53 Filed: 09/04/2025 Pg: 1 of 31 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1828 IN RE: GARDASIL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. ------------------------------ TESSA NEEDHAM, Plaintiff –