⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “William Gonzalez v. County of Los Angeles”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-04-08 · Published · cited 0× · 375 F. App'x 688
MEMORANDUM ** Intervenor-Appellant Freddie Fuiava’s petition for habeas corpus is currently pending in state court. The state court partially granted Fuiava’s motion under California Penal Code § 1054.9 to take additional discovery in support of his petition. Fuiava then moved to intervene in this closed case in the Central District of California seeking modification of any protective order covering the di
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-04-08 · Published · cited 0× · 375 F. App'x 688
MEMORANDUM ** Intervenor-Appellant Freddie Fuiava’s petition for habeas corpus is currently pending in state court. The state court partially granted Fuiava’s motion under California Penal Code § 1054.9 to take additional discovery in support of his petition. Fuiava then moved to intervene in this closed case in the Central District of California seeking modification of any protective order covering the di
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-04-24 · Published · cited 3× · 275 F. App'x 664
MEMORANDUM ** *667Freddie Fuiava appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to intervene in this closed case in the Central District, to seek modification of a protective order that apparently is still in effect. Fuiava, a prisoner seeking post-conviction relief in state court, alleges a need to access parts of the district
California Supreme Court · 2002-05-20 · Published · cited 513× · 45 P.3d 1171; 119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 709; 27 Cal. 4th 1112; 2002 Daily Journal DAR 5505; 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4331; 2002 Cal. LEXIS 3270
119 Cal.Rptr.2d 709 (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1112 45 P.3d 1171 Dana E. ZELIG, a Minor, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S081791. Supreme Court of California. May 20, 2002. *713 Talcott, Lightfoot, Vandevelde & Sad
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-02-02 · Published · cited 29× · 92 F.4th 781
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RACHEL SCANLON; STEVEN No. 21-55999 SAWYER, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for K.X. and G.X.; D.C. No. K. X., a minor; G. X., a minor, 2:18-cv-07759- CBM-AS Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; LOURDES OLARTE; MARISOL GONZALEZ; AN
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-05-30 · Published · cited 483× · 891 F.3d 776
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HERIBERTO RODRIGUEZ; CARLOS No. 13-56292 FLORES; JUAN CARLOS SANCHEZ; ERICK NUNEZ; JUAN TRINIDAD, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 2:10-cv-06342- CBM-AJW v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Defendants, and DANIEL CRUZ; MATTHEW ONHEMUS;
California Court of Appeal · 2024-01-25 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 1/25/2024 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO ALI SHALGHOUN, B323186 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 19STCV19756) NORTH LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER, INC., Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from
District Court, C.D. California · 2014-05-29 · Published · cited 8× · 96 F. Supp. 3d 990; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183381; 2014 WL 8396787
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS (1) FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW; (2) MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT AS TO MOVING DEFENDANTS AND FOR A NEW TRIAL FOR THESE DEFENDANTS AFTER RESOLUTION OF INTERLOCUTORY QUALIFIED IMMUNITY APPEALS; (3) TO VACATE PUNITIVE DAMAGES; and (4) FOR A NEW TRIAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 59(A). CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge. Before the Court are four post-trial motions filed by D
California Court of Appeal · 2024-02-22 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 2/22/24 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO ALI SHALGHOUN, B323186 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 19STCV19756) NORTH LOS ANGELES
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-08-15 · Published · cited 2325× · 833 F.3d 1060; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14950; 2016 WL 4268955
Partial Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge IKUTA OPINION GRABER, Circuit Judge: The Los Angeles Sheriffs Department' (“LASD”) detained Jonathan Castro, in a sobering cell in the West Hollywood police station. Several hours later, authorities placed Jonathan Gonzalez, a combative inmate who had been arrested on a felony charge, in the same cell. Castro banged on the cell’s
District Court, C.D. California · 2016-04-06 · Published · cited 1× · 177 F. Supp. 3d 1194; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47325; 2016 WL 1383458
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION (Dkt. 84) Honorable Christina A. Snyder, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On February 6, 2014, plaintiffs Reverend Father Ian Elliott Davies, Reverend J. Edwin Bacon, Jr., Shakeel Syed, Rabbi Harold M. Schulweis, Reverend Tera Little, Rabbi John Rosove, Reverend Peter Laarman, David N. Myers, a
District Court, C.D. California · 2011-07-12 · Published · cited 17× · 820 F. Supp. 2d 1081; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123908; 2011 WL 5027070
820 F.Supp.2d 1081 (2011) Ricky MONTEILH, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Evelyn Gonzalez, Edyth Redmond, Maricruz Trevino, City of West Covina, Michelle Figueroa, and Jeff Mosley, Defendants. Case No. CV 10-08183-SVW-JEM. United States District Court, C.D. California. July 12, 2011. *1085 Robert R. Powell, Law Offices of Ro
California Supreme Court · 2012-07-05 · Published · cited 115× · 54 Cal. 4th 610; 279 P.3d 1052; 143 Cal. Rptr. 3d 565; 2012 WL 2579998; 2012 Cal. LEXIS 6358
Opinion BAXTER, J. Under certain circumstances, found by a preponderance of evidence, and indicating that a minor child is bereft of care or support by a parent or guardian, or has suffered or risks actual or threatened serious injury, illness, emotional damage, or sexual abuse because of a custodial parent’s or
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 315× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-03-18 · Published · cited 37× · 745 F.3d 1249; 2014 WL 1013244
OPINION PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Because of an exemption written into the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), Los Angeles City employees “engaged in fire protection” (i.e. firefighters) do not receive standard overtime pay — time and a half for all hours worked over forty in one *125
California Supreme Court · 2008-05-19 · Published · cited 78× · 182 P.3d 1027; 76 Cal. Rptr. 3d 483; 43 Cal. 4th 905
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 907 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 908 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-04-07 · Published · cited 54× · 955 F.3d 762
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ESTEBAN ALEMAN GONZALEZ; No. 18-16465 EDUARDO GUTIERREZ SANCHEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01869- v. JSC WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General; CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary, OPINION Department of Homeland Security; JAMES MCHENRY, Director, Executive Office for Immigration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001-02-14 · Published · cited 5× · 240 F.3d 754; 2001 Daily Journal DAR 1677; 49 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 236; 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1323; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2152; 2000 WL 33170745
240 F.3d 754 (9th Cir. 2001) MARY SANDERS LEE, individually and as the Conservator for the Estate of KERRY SANDERS; KERRY SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellants,v.COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; CITY OF LOS ANGELES; STAN EFRON; A. HADDOCK, Officer, #25553; MCCALLESTER, Detective, #233680; HOLMSTROM, Detective, #320622; NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Defendants-Appellees. No. 98-55807 UNITED ST
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021-09-08 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 8, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D19-2520 Lower Tribunal No. 17-20195 ________________ Maria Mesa De Los Angeles, Appellant,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-01-28 · Published · cited 0× · 741 F.3d 922; 2014 WL 296095; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 1745
OPINION PER CURIAM: When a student between the ages of 18 and 22 who is eligible for special education services in California is incarcerated in a county jail, who pays the cost of those services? The school district of the student’s parent’s residence? The county in which the jail is located? The State of California? To find out, we certified a question of California law — -specifically, the interpretati