Cases

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1391 DOROTHY E. SMITH, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Julian Jackson Smith, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCHLAGE LOCK COMPANY, LLC, Defendant - Appellee, and AMETEK, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Haveg

Gary D. Witt, Judge Stephen Smith (“Stephen”) 1 worked as a medical laboratory technician at Capital Region Medical Center (“Capital Region”) from 1969 until March 2006. In April 2006, Stephen filed a claim with the Division of Workers’ Compensation alleging that he had contracted the occupational disease of hepatitis C

495 S.E.2d 395 (1998) Debbie F. SMITH, Cathy Cahall and Tracy Newman, Plaintiffs, v. William Edward PRIVETTE, individually; White Plains United Methodist Church; the Raleigh District of the North Carolina Conference of the United Methodist Church, and the North Carolina Conference of the United Methodist Church, Defendants. No. COA97-199. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Feb

487 S.E.2d 807 (1997) The ESTATE OF Ada T. SMITH, By and Through her Executor, James T. SMITH; Ada Kelly Smith Hines; Jane Elizabeth Smith Yeargan; The Estate of Marie Smith Wallace by and through her Executor, James T. Smith; Marvin Simeon Honeycutt, individually and as Secretary of Smith-S, Inc., Sue Worthington Smith; James Thomas Smith, individually, as Trustee of the W.H. Smith Trust, as Trustee of the Ada T. Smith Trust, and as President of Smith-S

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Kevin Seafler, Roy A. Smyth, Carol K. Smyth, FILED Thomas A. Mooney, Dorothy Ann Mooney, November 22, 2013 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK Judith B. Douglas, Patsy Pauley, SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Plaintif

Donald L. Corbin, Justice. Ted Smith, separate appellant, an attorney, was rendering tax and other personal services for plaintiffs in this case. In the fall of 1976, Mr. Smith approached plaintiffs about investing in a limited partnership he was forming. Mr. Smith advised plaintiffs they would receive tax benefits by entering into the limited partnership. On November 16, 1976, Washington Farm was formed a

315 Ga. 357 FINAL COPY S22A1109. SMITH v. THE STATE. ELLINGTON, Justice. A Lamar County jury found Ronald Eugene Smith guilty of malice murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Charles Adams.1 Smith appeals from the denial of his 1 On December 15, 2009, a Lamar County grand jury indicted Smith for malice murder (Count 1); felony murder predicated on aggravated assault (Count 2); aggravated assault (Count 3); possession of a f

131 F.3d 580w Richard C. BECHERER, et al., individually and on behalf ofall others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,J. Don Adams; Kay A. Arceneaux, as Executrix for the DonaldJ. Arceneaux, Sr. Estate; Edward R. Bassine; Anne T.Bassine; Thomas H. Blundell; Jan L. Blundell; James A.Campbell; Darrell R. Caudill; William A. Cherry;Catherine Crebbs, as General Partner of CCT & Co. asadministratrix of Estate of Rober

440 F.2d 1055 Robert L. and Dorothy G. MAPLE, Petitioners-Appellees,v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant.William M. and Eleanor A. SMITH, Petitioners-Appellees,v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant. No. 24462. No. 24463. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 15, 1971.

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest Illinois Official Reports to the accuracy

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-0043V Filed: February 20, 2020 PUBLISHED DOROTHY SMITH, Special Master Horner Petitioner, v. Inter

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

12/23/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 1, 2024 IN RE DOROTHY A. ET AL. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Dickson County No. 10-21-145-TPR Jerred A. Creasy, Judge ___________________________________

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE, BUT IMPOSING ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS William J. Martinez, United States District Judge Currently before the Court are two motions: Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Supplement Her Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion to Supplement”) (ECF No. 61), and Defendant’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 64). The Co

193 F.3d 415 (6th Cir. 1999) RICHARD C. BECHERER, ET AL., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,J. DON ADAMS; KAY A. ARCENEAUX, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE DONALD J. ARCENEAUX, SR. ESTATE; EDWARD R. BASSINE; ANNE T. BASSINE; THOMAS H. BLUNDELL; JAN L. BLUNDELL; JAMES A.CAMPBELL; DARRELL R. CAUDILL; WILLIAM A. CHERRY; CATHERINE CREBBS, AS GENERAL PARTNER OF CCT & CO. AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF ESTATE OF ROBERT W. CRE

118 P.3d 831 (2005) G.A.S.P., Sierra Club, Oregon Wildlife Federation, Karyn Jones, Susan Jones, Heather Billy, Deborah Burns, Janice H. Lohman, Leandra Phillips, Merle C. Jones, Cindy Beatty, Andrea E. Stine, Dorothy Irish, Mary Bloom, Robert J. Palzer, Janet Nagy, Ladonna King, John Spomer, Christine Clark, Stuart Dick, Gail Horning, David Burns, Pius A. Horning, Karla Stuck, and Melanie Beltane, Appellants, v. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION

396 F.Supp. 555 (1975) Thomas Eugene SMITH and Dorothy Jean Smith, his wife, Plaintiffs, v. Larry WICKLINE, Individually and as a police officer with the Oklahoma City Police Department, and I. G. Purser, Individually and as Chief of Police of the Oklahoma City Police Department, Defendants. No. Civ.-75-0204-E. United States District Court, W. D. Oklahoma. June 23, 1975.

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS & MOTION TO JOIN NECESSARY PART ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge. This is an environmental law case that arises from the chemical contamination of *1004property associated with a dry cleaning business. Plaintiffs (collectively “Coppola”) have brought suit against the City of Visalia (“the City”

The third-party plaintiff, Richard W. Gushman, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing his third-party complaint against the state of Ohio, and raises a single assignment of error, as follows: "The Court of Claims erred in dismissing Mr. Gushman's third party complaint against the state of Ohio because the third party complaint states claims against the state in accordance with the same rules of law applicable to suits between private parties and the Court of Claims h

CARLEY, Presiding Justice. Salon Baptiste and Cheryl Baptiste (Appellees) filed a complaint for damages against Chuck Smith and WQXI 790 AM (Appellants), based on allegedly defamatory statements made by Smith and broadcast by WQXI. Pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-68 (a), Appellants offered to settle the case for $5,000. Appellees did not respond to the offer, which was deemed a rejection under OCGA § 9-11-68 (c). The trial court subse