⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “William Edward Laforge”

Hays v. LaForgepublic domain
District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2015-07-06 · Published · cited 3× · 113 F. Supp. 3d 883; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87221; 2015 WL 4087070
MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS GLEN H. DAVIDSON, Senior District Judge. Presently before the Court is Defendant William N. LaForge’s motion to dismiss [38] filed pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Upon due consideration, the Court finds that the motion is well taken and should be granted, for the reasons set forth below.</
Porter v. LaForgepublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927-11-15 · Published · cited 0× · 222 A.D. 684
Motion for extension of time to serve bill of particulars denied. Present — Lazansky. P. J., Rich, Kapper, Seeger and Carswell, JJ.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010-12-22 · Published · cited 0× · 56 So. 3d 372; 2010 La.App. 4 Cir. 1039; 2010 La. App. LEXIS 1785; 2010 WL 5423727
ROLAND L. BELSOME, Judge. | jDefendants-Appellants appealed the trial court’s denial of their Motion for Summary Judgment, which was declared final on April 9, 2010. Pursuant to La. C.C.P. art. 1915, however, that interlocutory judgment could not be certified as final. Accordingly, we have converted the appeal in the above-captioned matter into a supervisory writ. Plaintiff-Appellee Joseph Hermo owned a t
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-02-06 · Published · cited 79× · 436 F.3d 1125; 24 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 41; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2828; 2006 WL 267154
RESTANI, Judge. The United States District Court for the District of Nevada dismissed claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with pendent state-law claims, by two employees, Sergeant Brian Dias and Officer William Mason, Sr., who were terminated by the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Department of Public Safety (“UNLV”) after allegedly falsifying time entries in a Departm
District Court, D. Nevada · 2014-03-24 · Published · cited 0× · 5 F. Supp. 3d 1238; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38399; 2014 WL 1199595
ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. This case arises out of the default of four commercial loans. Pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim and Defense (ECF No. 52). For the reasons given herein, the Court grants the motion. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Between April 2007 and February 2008, non-party Colonial Bank gave Defendant Kiley Ranch C
Johnson v. Guhlpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004-03-26 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-26-2004 Johnson v. Guhl Precedential or Non-Precedenti
Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996-12-30 · Published · cited 35× · 929 P.2d 535; 44 ERC (BNA) 1403; 1996 Wyo. LEXIS 186; 1996 WL 740073
929 P.2d 535 (1997) SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION, a Wyoming corporation, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Appellee (Defendant). SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION, a Wyoming corporation, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a North Carolina corporation, formerly Royal Globe Insurance Company; and Safeguard Insurance Company, a Connecticut corporation, Appellees (Defendants).
Johnson v. Guhlpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004-03-26 · Published · cited 7× · 357 F.3d 403
357 F.3d 403 Donald H. JOHNSON; Juanita L. Johnson; Eugene V. Mariani; Dorothy Mariani; Mary Lou Fleming; William R. Fleming; William C. Schaible; Phyllis R. Schaible, by her Court Appointed Guardian; Lois Benedetto; Gerald Benedetto; Donna R. Banks; Charles V. Banks, Estate of; Raymond O. Denman, Jr.; Frances C. Denman; Charles N. Hicks; Marie L. Hicks; Ann B. Silbernagel; Norman V. Silbernagel; Anna Prystasch; Stanley Prystasch; Mary Mackron; Ant
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008-01-07 · Published · cited 14× · 896 N.E.2d 715; 177 Ohio App. 3d 852; 2008 Ohio 41
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 854 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 855 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE N
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999-02-03 · Published · cited 1× · 736 So. 2d 878; 1999 WL 44888
736 So.2d 878 (1999) Lisa Winters McCLELLAND on behalf of the minor child, Alexandra Ann WINTERS, Plaintiff-First Appellant, v. Abby James BROUSSARD, Defendant-Appellee & Second Appellant. No. 98-906. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 3, 1999. *879 Joseph R. Joy III, Lafayette, A.I. Stacey Williams Marcel,
Nevada Supreme Court · 2008-10-30 · Published · cited 190× · 194 P.3d 709; 124 Nev. 1048; 124 Nev. Adv. Rep. 88; 2008 Nev. LEXIS 106
194 P.3d 709 (2008) FIVE STAR CAPITAL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Michael W. RUBY, Individually and as Trustee of the Ruby Revocable Trust, Respondent. No. 48480. Supreme Court of Nevada. October 30, 2008. *710 Scarpello & Huss, Ltd., and Mark R. Forsberg, Carson City, for Appellant. Thorndal, Armstrong, Delk, Balkenbus
Johnson v. Guhlpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004-02-06 · Published · cited 3× · 357 F.3d 403; 2004 WL 225083
OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge. Medicaid is a federal assistance program, administered by the states, that helps individuals with below a certain level of assets pay for medical expenses. 1 Because Medicaid is available only to the needy, creative lawyers and financial planners have devis
Dias v. Eliquepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-02-06 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRIAN DIAS; WILLIAM MASON, SR.,  Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. No. 04-15290 D.C. No. JOSE ELIQUE; MICHAEL MURRAY; UNIVERSITY AND COMMUNITY  CV-02-00801-PMP COLLEGE SYSTEM OF NEVADA; (PAL) UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS
District Court, S.D. New York · 1999-10-12 · Published · cited 15× · 65 F. Supp. 2d 207
65 F.Supp.2d 207 (1999) In re AIR CRASH OFF LONG ISLAND NEW YORK, ON JULY 17, 1996. No. 96 Civ. 7986 (RWS). MDL No. 1161 (RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 12, 1999. *208 Kreindler & Kreindler, New York City (Lee S. Kreindler, Steven R. Pounian, James P. Kreindler, of counsel), Speiser, Krause, Nolan & Gr
People v. Dominguezpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2006-08-28 · Published · cited 159× · 140 P.3d 866; 47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 575; 39 Cal. 4th 1141; 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7971; 2006 Cal. LEXIS 9977
Opinion WERDEGAR, J. We address in this case three separate claims of error. First, we consider whether the trial court erred when it failed to instruct the jury, sua sponte, that a reasonable yet mistaken belief the victim consented to have sexual intercourse was a defense to a charge of rape. (People v. Mayberry (1975) 15 Cal.3d 143 [125 Cal.Rptr. 745, 542 P.2d 1337].) Because defendant did not re
Washington Supreme Court · 1989-01-06 · Published · cited 79× · 766 P.2d 438; 111 Wash. 2d 828
111 Wn.2d 828 (1989) 766 P.2d 438 MIKE KREIDLER, ET AL, Petitioners, v. KENNETH O. EIKENBERRY, as Attorney General, ET AL, Respondents. In the Matter of BALLOT TITLE FOR ALTERNATIVE MEASURE NO. 97B. Nos. 55238-0, 55398-0. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. January 6, 1989. Edwards & Barbieri, by Malcolm L. Edwards, Cather
Couey v. Atkinspublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 2015-07-16 · Published · cited 121× · 357 Or. 460; 355 P.3d 866; 2015 Ore. LEXIS 516
*462 LANDAU, J. ORS 250.048(9) 1 provides that a person who is registered with the Secretary of State to collect initiative petition signatures for pay may not, “at the same time, obtain signatures on a petition or prospective petition for which
Johnson v. Guhlpublic domain
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000-04-07 · Published · cited 31× · 91 F. Supp. 2d 754; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4485; 2000 WL 359624
91 F.Supp.2d 754 (2000) Donald H. JOHNSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michele K. GUHL, Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services, et al., Defendants. No. 99-CIV.-5403 WGB. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 7, 2000. *755 *756 *757
State v. McKenziepublic domain
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995-05-19 · Published · cited 19× · 532 N.W.2d 210; 1995 Minn. LEXIS 407; 1995 WL 302465
532 N.W.2d 210 (1995) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Mwati Pepi McKENZIE, Appellant. No. C8-94-94. Supreme Court of Minnesota. May 19, 1995. *213 Michael F. Cromett, St. Paul, for appellant. Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin County Atty., J. Michael Richardson, Asst. County
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996-09-06 · Published · cited 78× · 90 F.3d 1523
90 F.3d 1523 Daniel J. TRIERWEILER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CROXTON AND TRENCH HOLDING CORPORATION, a Delawarecorporation; Dublin Osaka Group, Inc., a Nevadacorporation; R&B Financial Group, a Texas corporation;Columbus Equities International, Inc., formerly known asParsons Securities, Inc., an Ohio corporation; MonetaryFund, Inc., a Texas corporation; Charles W. Trench;Benjamin C. Croxton, an individual; Ralp