⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “William Duane Benton”

In re Bentonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 1995-11-06 · Published · cited 0× · 265 Ga. 832; 463 S.E.2d 129; 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 3438; 1995 Ga. LEXIS 884
Per curiam. After a grievance was filed with the State Bar of Georgia by the Investigative Panel of the State Disciplinary Board, J. Robert Benton filed a petition for voluntary surrender of his license to practice law in the State of Georgia. The grievance stated that Benton, in his “failure *833to account for funds held in a fiduciary capacity,” may have violated St
Plybon v. Bentonpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991-04-09 · Published · cited 0× · 806 S.W.2d 520; 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 491; 1991 WL 46791
ULRICH, Judge. Duane Benton, Director of Revenue, appeals from default judgment entered on Gary Allen Plybon’s petition seeking review of the Director’s decision denying Mr. Plybon a driver’s license. The default judgment entered by the trial court ordered the Director to issue a driver’s license to Mr. Plybon. The trial court subsequently denied the Director’s motion to set aside the default judgment. The issue presented is
Humbert v. Bentonpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991-07-11 · Published · cited 0× · 811 S.W.2d 501; 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1082; 1991 WL 122357
SHRUM, Judge. The Director of Revenue (“Director”) appeals from a judgment ordering him to reinstate the motor vehicle operator’s license of Tony Shane Humbert. The Director revoked the license per § 302.505, RSMo 1986,1 because he received a verified report from a law enforcement officer that Humbert was arrested while operating a motor vehicle when the alcohol concentration in his blood or brea
Shoemake v. Bentonpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992-01-14 · Published · cited 0× · 821 S.W.2d 136; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 88; 1992 WL 4051
ORDER PER CURIAM. Appellant (Driver) appeals an order sustaining the Director of Revenue’s decision to revoke Appellant’s driver’s license for one year pursuant to § 577.041, RSMo (Cum.Supp.1990). Affirmed. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their informa
Foltz v. Bentonpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991-12-10 · Published · cited 0× · 819 S.W.2d 102; 1991 WL 258930
ORDER PER CURIAM. Appellant (Driver) appeals an order sustaining the Director of Revenue’s decision to revoke Appellant’s driver’s license for one year pursuant to § 577.041, RSMo (Cum.Supp.1990). Affirmed. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their informa
Hill v. Bentonpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991-02-19 · Published · cited 0× · 804 S.W.2d 805; 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 241; 1991 WL 18782
GRIMM, Judge. Director of Revenue appeals from the trial court’s order setting aside the revocation of Richard Hill’s license and driving privileges. We affirm. Director of Revenue raises two points on appeal. First, he contends the trial court erred in setting aside the revocation of *806Hill’s license. Director argues Hill’s petition to review wa
Trotter v. Bentonpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991-07-22 · Published · cited 0× · 811 S.W.2d 865; 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1142; 1991 WL 131922
PREWITT, Presiding Judge. Defendant gave notice to plaintiff under § 302.291, RSMo Supp.1989, requiring him to submit to an examination of his ability to operate a motor vehicle. That section is set out below.1 Plaintiff did not pass the test and his driving privileges were revoked. He thereafter petitioned the circuit court to reverse defendant’s order and order defendant to
District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1990-02-01 · Published · cited 2× · 729 F. Supp. 671; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1085; 1990 WL 7561
729 F.Supp. 671 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Duane BENTON, Director of Revenue, State of Missouri; Missouri Department of Revenue and State of Missouri, Defendants. No. 89-0608-CV-W-3. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D. February 1, 1990. *672 E. Eugene Harrison, U.S. Attorney's Office, Kansas City
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992-09-16 · Published · cited 3× · 975 F.2d 511; 38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,426; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22060; 1992 WL 221984
975 F.2d 511 38 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) P 76,426 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Duane BENTON, Director of Revenue, State of Missouri;Missouri Department of Revenue; State ofMissouri, Appellants. No. 91-2206. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 9, 1992.Decided Sept. 16, 1992.
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992-05-26 · Published · cited 0× · 832 S.W.2d 325; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 966; 1992 WL 108053
ORDER PER CURIAM. Birt appeals from an order of summary judgment in favor of the State of Missouri for income tax, interest and penalty. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)
McGehee v. Bentonpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 962 So. 2d 1234; 2007 WL 2702992
GARY D. McGEHEE, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL McGEHEE & SHELDON DUANE McGEHEE v. KEVIN CLARK BENTON, DR. TRACY BENTON, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY & GEICO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY No. 2006 CA 2335. Court of Appeals of Louisiana, First Circuit. September 14, 2007. NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION ROBERT E. KLEINPETER, JAY G. McMANIS, Counsel for Plaintiff/
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005-12-08 · Published · cited 8× · 430 F.3d 939; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 26771; 2005 WL 3310444
LAY, Circuit Judge. Duane D. Hill entered a conditional plea of guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2), after the district court 1 denied his motion to suppress firearms seized from his home. Hill appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss. We affirm.
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2003-01-28 · Published · cited 31× · 95 S.W.3d 93; 2003 Mo. LEXIS 18; 2003 WL 174968
95 S.W.3d 93 (2003) Willie HARVEY, Respondent, v. Eric WASHINGTON, M.D., Denise Taylor, M.D., and Wendell Williams, M.D., Appellants. No. SC 84449. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. January 28, 2003. *94 D. Paul Myre, Stuart M. Haw, St. Louis, Mary L. Reitz, Kevin F. O'Malley, Theodore D. Agniel, Clayton, Thomas B. Weaver, Cynt
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-1758 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff-Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006-04-19 · Published · cited 130× · 445 F.3d 1046; 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2513; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 9727; 2006 WL 1007904
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Duane Carlson (Carlson) brought this action in state court against his former employer Arrowhead Concrete Works, Inc. (Arrowhead) for retaliatory discharge and failure to recall, in violation of the Minnesota Occupational Safety and Health Act and the state whistleblower statute. Arrowhead removed the case to the federal district court, alleging complete
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006-04-19 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-3100 ___________ Duane Carlson, * * Plaintiff-Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Dist
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2002-06-25 · Published · cited 21× · 77 S.W.3d 612; 2002 Mo. LEXIS 78; 2002 WL 1364102
77 S.W.3d 612 (2002) Norman L. ENDICOTT, Jr., Respondent, v. DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant, and ASAP Services and ADECCO Employment Services, Inc., Respondents, and Graphic Technologies, Inc., Appellant. No. SC 84044. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. June 25, 2002. *613 William F. Ringer, Clinton D. Collier, Mi
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983-01-24 · Published · cited 9× · 698 F.2d 813; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 31145
698 F.2d 813 9 Ed. Law Rep. 55 Barbara Jean BERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, et al.,Defendants-Appellees.William G. Milliken, Governor of the State of Michigan, etal., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 81-1391 to 81-1396. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued Jun
Hill v. Hillpublic domain
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2001-07-24 · Published · cited 34× · 53 S.W.3d 114; 2001 Mo. LEXIS 74; 2001 WL 826814
53 S.W.3d 114 (2001) Carolyn F. HILL, Respondent, v. Bernard J. HILL, Appellant. No. SC 83279. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. July 24, 2001. Rehearing Denied September 25, 2001. *115 Daniel R. Schramm, Paul H. Schramm, St. Louis, William P. Grant, Clayton, for appellant. Michael L. Schechter, Theodore
Middleton v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2002-06-11 · Published · cited 43× · 80 S.W.3d 799; 2002 WL 1277224
80 S.W.3d 799 (2002) John J. MIDDLETON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. SC 83909. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. June 11, 2002. Rehearing Denied August 27, 2002. *803 William J. Swift, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackel