⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “William Corwin Stuart”

Supreme Court of Delaware · 2015-10-02 · Published · cited 144× · 125 A.3d 304; 2015 Del. LEXIS 473; 2015 WL 5772262
STRINE, Chief Justice: In a well-reasoned opinion, the Court of Chancery held that the business judgment rule is invoked as the appropriate standard of review for a post-closing damages action *306 when a merger that is not subject to the entire fairness standard of review has been approved by a ful
Thomas v. Corwinpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007-04-03 · Published · cited 147× · 483 F.3d 516; 19 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 186; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7601; 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,804; 100 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 297
483 F.3d 516 Jan THOMAS, Appellant,v.Jim CORWIN, Chief of the Kansas City, Missouri Police Department; Karl Zobrist, President, Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, Missouri; Javier M. Perrez, Vice President, Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, Missouri; Angela Wasson-Hunt, Treasurer, Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, Missouri; James Wilson, Member of the Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, Missouri;
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007-04-03 · Published · cited 0× · 483 F.3d 516
RILEY, Circuit Judge. Jan Thomas (Thomas) appeals from the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment on her claims of disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213; age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C.
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016-03-10 · Published · cited 0× · 212 F. Supp. 3d 1286; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186431; 2016 WL 4154911
*1288ORDER KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Parties’ competing motions for partial summary judgment (DE 138,146). I. BACKGROUND Defendant Sarris hired Mike Roberts to market the Defendant’s dental practice. (DE 136 ¶ 19).1
District Court, S.D. New York · 1981-01-21 · Published · cited 5× · 505 F. Supp. 192; 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10387
505 F.Supp. 192 (1981) Stephen BERGER, Plaintiff, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and Robert S. Corwin, Defendants. No. 79 Civ. 5653(MEL). United States District Court, S. D. New York. January 21, 1981. *193 Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter, New York City, for plaintiff; Stuart L. Potter, Stephen F. Bailly, New
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010-07-23 · Published · cited 39× · 616 F.3d 520; 392 U.S. App. D.C. 339; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15179; 2010 WL 2870645
616 F.3d 520 (2010) SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, Petitioner v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent. California Independent System Operator Corporation, et al., Intervenors. Nos. 07-1208, 07-1216, 07-1217, 07-1513, 08-1298, 08-1311. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued February 25, 2010. Decided July 23,
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016-05-19 · Published · cited 0× · 188 F. Supp. 3d 895; 41 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 681; 62 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1715; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65916; 2016 WL 2910209
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CAROL E. JACKSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Plaintiff has responded in opposition, and the issues are fully briefed, I. Background Plaintiff Tonya Graham was employed by defendant Hubbs Machine and Manufacturing, Inc. from February 1996 until
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006-06-01 · Published · cited 2× · 2006 ND 118; 714 N.W.2d 851; 2006 N.D. LEXIS 117; 2006 WL 1515447
2006 ND 118 American Crystal Sugar Company, Applicant, Appellee, and Cross-Appellant v. Traill County Board of Commissioners, Appellant and Cross-Appellee No. 20050343 Supreme Court of North Dakota. Decided June 1, 2006 Wickham Corwin, Conmy Feste, Ltd., P.O. Box 2686, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2686, for applicant, appellee, and cross-appellant. Jon J. Jensen (argued
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012-03-23 · Published · cited 0× · 92 So. 3d 737; 2012 WL 975492; 2012 Ala. LEXIS 35
MURDOCK, Justice. The State Director of Finance, Marquita Davis (“the finance director”),1 and the State Comptroller, Thomas L. White, Jr. (“the comptroller”),2 appeal from a prelim*739inary injunction entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court in response to a declaratory-judgment action brought by the Alabama Ed
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2020-02-12 · Published · cited 0×
DEEP SOUTH CENTER FOR * NO. 2019-CA-0774 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, VAYLA NEW ORLEANS, * JUSTICE AND BEYOND, 350 COURT OF APPEAL NEW ORLEANS, SIERRA * CLUB, MR. THEODORE FOURTH CIRCUIT QUANT AND MS. RENATE * HEURICH STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* VERSUS THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, THE UTILITY, CABLE, TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE OF THE NEW
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004-01-30 · Published · cited 92× · 885 So. 2d 783; 2004 WL 179313
885 So.2d 783 (2004) Michael W. HALEY, as commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections v. BARBOUR COUNTY et al. Michael W. Haley, as commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections v. Barbour County et al. Donal Campbell, as commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections v. Barbour County et al. Donal Campbell, as commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections v. Barbour County et a
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 619 F. Supp. 2d 614; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74774; 2007 WL 2934905
(2007) Christine POSPISIL, Plaintiff, v. O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Randy Swaim, and Jon Workman, Defendants. No. C06-0143. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division. October 5, 2007. RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JON STUART SCOLES, United States Magistrate Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I
North Carolina Business Court · 2021-09-15 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 NCBC 57
Bloxsom v. Choquette, 2021 NCBC 57. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION CABARRUS COUNTY 20 CVS 3334 JOHN BLOXSOM; REBECCA BLOXSOM; HEATH DRYE; CAROLINE DRYE; TINTU PARAMESWAR; and DONNA PARAMESWAR, individually and derivatively on behalf of Saratoga Homeowners Association, Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AND OPINION O
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006-10-27 · Published · cited 1× · 957 So. 2d 459; 2006 WL 3042905
Medical Assurance Company, Inc. ("Medical Assurance"), appeals from the order of the Montgomery Circuit Court granting the motion for a summary judgment filed by Johnnie Timmons, as administratrix of the estate of Brandi Timmons, deceased ("Timmons"), one of the defendants in the declaratory-judgment action filed by Medical Assurance. In that same order, the trial court denied the cross-motion for a summary judgment filed by Medical Assurance. The other defendants in the declaratory-j
Supreme Court of the United States · 1997-03-31 · Published · cited 465× · 137 L. Ed. 2d 369; 117 S. Ct. 1174; 520 U.S. 180; 1997 U.S. LEXIS 2078; 97 Daily Journal DAR 4173; 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 365; 6 Communications Reg. (P&F) 829; 25 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1449; 65 U.S.L.W. 4209; 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2234
520 U.S. 180 (1997) TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., et al. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al. No. 95-992. United States Supreme Court. Argued October 7, 1996. Decided March 31, 1997. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA *181 *182
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2016-12-20 · Published · cited 125× · 152 A.3d 1248; 2016 Del. LEXIS 653
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EL PASO PIPELINE GP COMPANY, L.L.C., § § No. 103, 2016 Defendant Below, § Appellant/Cross-Appellee, § § and § Court Below: § Court of Chancery of the EL PASO CORPORATION, DOUGLAS L. § State
New York Court of Appeals · 1991-10-22 · Published · cited 175× · 78 N.Y.2d 398; 576 N.Y.S.2d 185; 582 N.E.2d 568; 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 4795
Hancock, Jr., J. (dissenting). This case involves the constitutional limits on the reach of gubernatorial power, not the relative merits of nuclear power, the wisdom of a nuclear-oriented national energy policy, or whether the Shoreham nuclear power facility should be decommissioned.1 The critical *418issue is whether the Governor, purporting to
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2025-03-26 · Published · cited 0×
03/26/2025 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 22, 2024 Session1 HEATHER SMITH v. BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF TENNESSEE Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 21-0938 Jeffre
Willard v. Bargerpublic domain
North Carolina Business Court · 2020-10-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 NCBC 72
Willard v. Barger, 2020 NCBC 72. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF DAVIE 19 CVS 182 CHARLES WILLARD and TRACY BARNES BLIMP WORKS, LLC, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS v.
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2023-07-19 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CCSB FINANCIAL CORP., § § Defendant Below, § No. 424, 2022 Appellant, § § v. § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware DEANN M. TOTTA, LAURIE § MORRISSEY, CHASE WATSON, §