Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “William C McAdams and Jill A McAdams”
McAdams v. McCordpublic domain
584 F.3d 1111 (2009) Joseph McADAMS; JBM, LLC; Florian Homm; Absolute Return Europe Fund, LTD; The Loyr Foundations; Europe Catalyst Fund; Richard Smyth, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. William McCORD; Daniel Moudy; Lynn Bradley; David Colwell, Defendants, Moore Stephens Frost, PLC, Defendant-Appellee, William McCord, Counter Claimant, v. Joseph McAdams; Florian Homm, Counter Defendants, Daniel Moudy, Third Party Plaintiff, v.
People v. ORABUENApublic domain
10 Cal.Rptr.3d 99 (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 84 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Timothy Robert ORABUENA, Defendant and Appellant. No. H025987. Court of Appeal, Sixth District. February 25, 2004. As Modified March 24, 2004. *101 Kathleen Woods Novoa, Big Sur, for Appellant (under appoi
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC v. Hilliardpublic domain
469 F.Supp.2d 103 (2007) CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC, Plaintiff, v. Russell G. HILLIARD, Elizabeth T. Hilliard, Karyn Hilliard, Karyn Hilliard Revocable Trust, and. Stuart. Gilbertson, Defendants. No. 06 Civ.1993(MGC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 3, 2007. *104 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich. & Rosati,
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Registerpublic domain
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
United States v. NCR Corp.public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, Chief Judge. I. Introduction This is an action brought by the United States and the State of Wisconsin under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., seeking, among other relief, an injunction requiring the defendant pape
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
in Re George Green and Garlan Greenpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-14-00725-CV 4956355 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Winternitz v. Winternitzpublic domain
Filed 2/27/15; pub. order 3/27/15 (see end of opn.) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TAMI L. WINTERNITZ, D065131 Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. D536848) WILLIAM W. WINTERNITZ, JR., Respondent. APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of
2023 WI 33 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2021AP102 COMPLETE TITLE: Green Bay Professional Police Association and Andrew Weiss, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, v. City of Green Bay, Defendant-Respondent.
McKinlay v. Department of Social & Health Servicespublic domain
Munson, J. These cases were consolidated for oral argument and decision because both involve the revocation of the parties' day-care license and present the pivotal issue of who pays for the transcription of the testimonial record from a hearing held before an administrative law judge, i.e., the appellant or the agency. The two trial courts reached opposite results, namely, one held the appellant pays, the other the agen
Slay v. Glickmanpublic domain
137 F.Supp.2d 743 (2001) Greta SLAY Plaintiff v. Dan GLICKMAN, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture Defendant No. CIV.A. 3:99-CV-752BN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. April 2, 2001. *744 *745
. ' fl03ii'I RATIFICATION OF OIL AND GAS LEASE . STAlEOFTEXAS § FILED IN § 1
Southern Bancorp South v. Richmond (In Re Richmond)public domain
430 B.R. 846 (2010) In re James Victor RICHMOND and Jill Janette Richmond, Debtors. Southern Bancorp South f/k/a/ First Bank of the Delta, N.A., Plaintiff, v. James Victor Richmond and Jill Janette Richmond, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 2:07-bk-14908M. Adversary No. 2:08-ap-1135. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division. June 16, 2010.
Anderson v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC CAUSATION TESTIMONY FROM PLAINTIFF’S EXPERTS TED STEWART, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Crane Co.’s Renewed Motion to *1219Exclude the Proposed Specific Causation Testimony from Plaintiffs Experts. Defendants York Internatio
Sloan v. Gen. Motors LLCpublic domain
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs allege that Defendant General Motors (GM) manufactured and sold a car engine that, due to several internal defects, consumes excessive amounts of oil, resulting in engine damage that presents a safety risk of sudden shutdowns or engine fires. GM moves to dismiss on several grounds which can broadly be grouped under challenges to personal jurisdiction for the out-of-state plaint
ACCEPTED 15-25-00018-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/14/2025 6:01 PM No. 15-25-00018-CV CHRISTOPHE
Ritchie-Gamester v. City of Berkleypublic domain
597 N.W.2d 517 (1999) 461 Mich. 73 Jill RITCHIE-GAMESTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The CITY OF BERKLEY and D. Hendricks, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, and Halley Mann and Douglas K. Mann II, as Guardian Ad Litem for Halley Mann, Defendants/Third-Party Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 109633., Calendar No. 3. Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued Marc
Panzer v. Doylepublic domain
271 Wis.2d 295 (2004) 2004 WI 52 680 N.W.2d 666 Mary E. PANZER, personally and as Majority Leader of the Wisconsin Senate, John G. Gard, personally and as Speaker of the Wisconsin Assembly, and Joint Committee on Legislative Organization, Petitioners, v. James E. DOYLE, in his official capacity as Governor of Wisconsin and Marc J. Marotta, in his official capacity as acting Secretary of the Wisconsi
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams